Skip to main content

Reducing Risk, Improving Resiliency: How Companies Use ITOA

Doron Pinhas

Enterprise IT teams are continually challenged to manage larger and more complex systems with fewer resources. This requires a level of efficiency that can only come from complete visibility and intelligent control, based on the data coming out of IT systems. It is not surprising to see that a growing number of organizations are turning to IT Operations Analytics solutions to help them track performance, improve operational efficiency, and prevent service disruptions within their IT infrastructure.

IT operations analytics provide a robust set of tools that can generate the necessary insights to help IT operations teams proactively determine the risks, impacts, or outages that can occur due to various events that may take place in an environment. Gartner estimates that by 2017, approximately 15% of enterprises will actively use ITOA (IT Operations Analytics) technologies to provide insight into both business execution and IT operations, up from fewer than 5% today.

So how can we then use these analytics to effectively improve IT operational excellence? How can it help us make better decisions? And most importantly, how can it help prevent downtime and service disruptions?

Continuity Software recently conducted an infrastructure resiliency survey, with the goal of helping IT infrastructure and operations executives benchmark their organization’s performance and practices against their peers. The results presented here are based on responses from 230 IT professionals from a wide range of industries and geographies collected through an online survey.

Most survey respondents come from mid-size and large companies, with 40% of the survey respondents coming from organizations of over 10,000 employees. Over half of the respondents (54%) have more than 500 servers in their datacenter.

Some of the key findings of the survey include:

■ Avoiding productivity loss is the top driver for infrastructure resiliency initiatives, cited by 44% of the survey respondents. Additional drivers include ensuring customer satisfaction (22%), protecting company reputation (17%) and regulatory compliance (13%)

■ Service availability goals are becoming more ambitious. As many as 81% of the survey respondents have a service availability goal of less than 8 hours of unplanned downtime a year (compared to 73% in 2014), and 37% have a goal of less than one hour a year.


■ At the same time, as many as 39% of the respondents fell short of meeting their goal. 34% of the organizations surveyed had an unplanned outage in the past month, and 13% had one in the past week.

■ While cyber-attacks make headlines, they only cause a small fraction of system downtime. The most common causes are application error and system upgrades, each responsible for over four hours a year on average.

■ Although the majority of the survey respondents have moved some of their mission-critical systems to the cloud, those that have mission-critical systems in the cloud were less successful in meeting their service availability goals compared to organizations that have not made the move.


■ The top challenge in meeting infrastructure resiliency goals is the knowledge gap and inability to keep up with vendor recommendations and best practices. This challenge is significantly more prominent in the cloud environment and one of the primary factors why companies with a larger cloud footprint are struggling to meet their goals.


■ Large companies have a higher price tag on downtime. For 36% of the organizations with over 10,000 employees, the average hour of downtime costs over $100,000.

As IT environments become more complex and more systems are deployed in virtualized private cloud settings, having the right tools to manage IT operations becomes essential. IT Operations Analytics solutions that generate actionable insights across the entire IT landscape are helping IT teams be more proactive and efficient, allowing organizations to improve resiliency and prevent disruptions to critical business services.

Doron Pinhas is CTO of Continuity Software.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...

Reducing Risk, Improving Resiliency: How Companies Use ITOA

Doron Pinhas

Enterprise IT teams are continually challenged to manage larger and more complex systems with fewer resources. This requires a level of efficiency that can only come from complete visibility and intelligent control, based on the data coming out of IT systems. It is not surprising to see that a growing number of organizations are turning to IT Operations Analytics solutions to help them track performance, improve operational efficiency, and prevent service disruptions within their IT infrastructure.

IT operations analytics provide a robust set of tools that can generate the necessary insights to help IT operations teams proactively determine the risks, impacts, or outages that can occur due to various events that may take place in an environment. Gartner estimates that by 2017, approximately 15% of enterprises will actively use ITOA (IT Operations Analytics) technologies to provide insight into both business execution and IT operations, up from fewer than 5% today.

So how can we then use these analytics to effectively improve IT operational excellence? How can it help us make better decisions? And most importantly, how can it help prevent downtime and service disruptions?

Continuity Software recently conducted an infrastructure resiliency survey, with the goal of helping IT infrastructure and operations executives benchmark their organization’s performance and practices against their peers. The results presented here are based on responses from 230 IT professionals from a wide range of industries and geographies collected through an online survey.

Most survey respondents come from mid-size and large companies, with 40% of the survey respondents coming from organizations of over 10,000 employees. Over half of the respondents (54%) have more than 500 servers in their datacenter.

Some of the key findings of the survey include:

■ Avoiding productivity loss is the top driver for infrastructure resiliency initiatives, cited by 44% of the survey respondents. Additional drivers include ensuring customer satisfaction (22%), protecting company reputation (17%) and regulatory compliance (13%)

■ Service availability goals are becoming more ambitious. As many as 81% of the survey respondents have a service availability goal of less than 8 hours of unplanned downtime a year (compared to 73% in 2014), and 37% have a goal of less than one hour a year.


■ At the same time, as many as 39% of the respondents fell short of meeting their goal. 34% of the organizations surveyed had an unplanned outage in the past month, and 13% had one in the past week.

■ While cyber-attacks make headlines, they only cause a small fraction of system downtime. The most common causes are application error and system upgrades, each responsible for over four hours a year on average.

■ Although the majority of the survey respondents have moved some of their mission-critical systems to the cloud, those that have mission-critical systems in the cloud were less successful in meeting their service availability goals compared to organizations that have not made the move.


■ The top challenge in meeting infrastructure resiliency goals is the knowledge gap and inability to keep up with vendor recommendations and best practices. This challenge is significantly more prominent in the cloud environment and one of the primary factors why companies with a larger cloud footprint are struggling to meet their goals.


■ Large companies have a higher price tag on downtime. For 36% of the organizations with over 10,000 employees, the average hour of downtime costs over $100,000.

As IT environments become more complex and more systems are deployed in virtualized private cloud settings, having the right tools to manage IT operations becomes essential. IT Operations Analytics solutions that generate actionable insights across the entire IT landscape are helping IT teams be more proactive and efficient, allowing organizations to improve resiliency and prevent disruptions to critical business services.

Doron Pinhas is CTO of Continuity Software.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Production incidents rarely announce themselves as database problems. They appear as slow transactions, timeouts, rising response times, or an application struggling under a workload it previously handled. APM provides an essential starting point. It can identify a slow transaction path, highlight an affected service, and show that a database dependency is consuming more time than expected. But identifying the database as part of the problem is not the same as explaining what is happening inside it ...

Cloud teams are under constant pressure to reduce spend without slowing development or increasing operational risk. They are deploying autoscalers, rightsizing workloads, enforcing resource requests, reviewing utilization dashboards, and building FinOps processes around cloud-native environments. Yet the results often disappoint ...

Ask most IT leaders about their biggest concern with AI and you'll hear the same answer: hallucinations ... Today, however, the conversation has shifted ... As organizations move beyond chatbots and experiments, they are increasingly deploying AI agents that perform multi-step tasks. These systems retrieve documents, query databases, call APIs, generate reports, write code, and make recommendations. The issue is not whether the model can reason. The issue is whether the organization can see, verify, and govern the decisions being made along the way ...

While organizations want to take control of their telemetry, building telemetry pipelines from scratch can be a very daunting, complicated task, even when leveraging open-source standards like OpenTelemetry. It requires specialized knowledge across distributed systems, data engineering, and security. This fragmented approach across systems causes higher operational costs; it puts a strain on resources and reduces efficiency as teams have to work with different interfaces and processes ...

For decades, enterprise networks were designed around a simple assumption: work happened inside the office. Applications lived in centralized data centers, employees connected through internal infrastructure, and security focused on protecting the perimeter that surrounded everything ... But the way organizations operate today bears little resemblance to that environment. Cloud platforms host critical applications, employees connect from homes and airports as often as they do from offices, and partners collaborate through shared systems that exist far beyond corporate walls. In short, the corporate network no longer resembles the environment it was designed to protect ...

As an analyst who researches how IT organizations design, build, and operate their networks, I find that network data is a constant source of pain. Network teams struggle with data quality, fragmentation, authority, access, and trust. And these issues undermine everything they try to do. Here are the numbers: Only 45% of network teams are completely confident in the accuracy of their network source of truth, which documents the intent of their network ...

The 2026 Global Data Center Survey from Uptime Institute reveals an industry navigating workforce constraints, escalating outage expenses, even as rising costs remain the top concern for management teams ...

The next observability gap may not be in the code. It may be under the rack. That sounds strange until you think about how AI incidents actually feel in the middle of an investigation ... The application dashboard may be accurate. It may also be stopping at the wrong boundary. AI systems depend on software, but they also depend on a dense physical stack: racks, power paths, thermal margin, maintenance activity and, in many environments, liquid cooling. Those physical dependencies can change slowly before they look like a software incident ...

Certificate expiration is the rare outage you can see coming. Every TLS certificate carries the date it stops working, so the moment it will begin breaking connections is knowable in advance. That's what makes an expired certificate such a frustrating way to lose a service. What's changing now is how often that date comes around ...

Enterprises operate different combinations of workloads across cloud, hybrid and multicloud environments. For business-critical workloads, teams need to consider monitoring and observability early so they can detect health issues, investigate failures, and understand operational impact. Organizations place workloads on cloud platforms based on a combination of technical requirements, economics, existing dependencies, organizational standards, and business priorities. Their monitoring priorities therefore depend on what they operate and where those systems run. Those priorities will not look the same for every organization ...