Skip to main content

The Status of Enterprise AI: AI Hype to Reality

Mike Marks
Riverbed

Organizations are gearing up to let the AI rubber hit the road in business initiatives, having spent the past several years implementing AI models mostly to improve IT and operations.

According to a recent survey, organizations see AI as critically important to their futures, with 94% of respondents saying that AI was a top priority of C-suite executives, and 64% of decision-makers saying they plan to use AI to drive growth initiatives and new business models over the next three years. Decision-makers acknowledge, however, that work is needed in order to take full advantage of AI's transformative capabilities. Only 37% said they are fully prepared to implement AI projects right now, but 86% said they expect to be ready by 2027 — presenting a mismatch of AI expectations versus reality.

Image
Riverbed

For IT leaders, a few hurdles stand in the way of AI success. They include concerns over data quality, security and the ability to implement projects. Understanding and addressing these concerns can give organizations a realistic view of where they stand in implementing AI — and balance out a certain level of overconfidence many organizations seem to have — to enable them to make the most of the technology's potential.

Data Quality a Top Concern

Perhaps the biggest concern is over the quality of data. Leaders understand that high-quality data is essential to training AI models and ensuring efficient performance — 85% said so — but most acknowledge that their own data is currently lacking in completeness and accuracy. Only 43% described their data as excellent for quantity and completeness, and 40% rated the accuracy and integrity of their data as excellent. Overall, 69% questioned the effectiveness of using their organization's data for AI.

Without improvements, data quality could become a major stumbling block, as 42% of decision-makers said that a lack of high-quality internal data for training AI models would prevent them from investing more in the technology.

Security-related issues also could deter further AI investments, with 43% citing cybersecurity risks and 36% identifying regulatory and compliance concerns as potential reasons to hold back. More than three-quarters of respondents (76%) are concerned that their use of AI could result in AI accessing their proprietary data in the public domain.

These factors play into questions about the ability to implement AI projects, which has sometimes been a struggle for some organizations. Implementation challenges are evident in the disparity between organizations' confidence in their AI abilities and the results of projects they've completed. Although 82% of decision-makers say their organizations are either significantly or slightly ahead of the competition in implementing AI, only 18% outperformed expectations while 23% underperformed and 59% met expectations.

Observability and Improved DEX Help Overcome AI Challenges

It's clear that organizations are focused on AI because of its potential to deliver substantial competitive advantages. And the research shows that high-performing companies, or growth companies, are those giving AI higher priority than moderate or low performers.

In moving forward, there are several interrelated factors organizations can focus on to help AI's potential become a reality.

Prioritize Observability. When it comes to improving IT and digital services, decision-makers emphasize the importance of observability, which collects and analyzes full-system telemetry to measure the health of a system, detect issues, identify dependencies and improve performance. Observability has been shown to have a significant impact on improving data quality — a top concern with moving forward on AI. 84% of respondents said they want an AI observability platform as opposed to implementing point products.

Tap Into the Successes of High-Performers. Research has also found a clear connection between those who made the most use of AI and those who performed the best. These "high performers" are those organizations with an average change in revenue of 10.5% or more, and they happen to be leveraging AI to its absolute full capabilities (67%) when compared to low performers (45%). Organizations looking to implement AI successfully, like high performers, should be prioritizing similar strategies to ensure performance of models and data. Confidence in data is significantly higher in the top performers when compared to the low performers (53% vs. 28%).

Focus on Improving the Digital Experience. Across all respondents, the survey showed that decision-makers were deploying different AI capabilities to improve digital user experience. 85% said AI-driven analytics improve user experience, while 86% said AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver an improved digital experience for end users.

Cultivate Young Employees. Millennial and Generation Z employees, who will comprise 74% of the workforce by 2030, are by far the most attuned to AI, with 52% of Gen Z and 39% of millennials having a favorable view of AI, as opposed to Generation X (8%) and baby boomers (1%). They also are the most insistent on good DEX. A Riverbed survey last year found that 68% of decision-makers said poor DEX would drive younger employees to leave the company, putting a company's AI strategy front and center for business growth too.

Conclusion

Organizations are moving in a positive direction, with 92% having formed a department or team to address some combination of AI, user experience and observability, with 57% dedicating an internal team or department to AI and 45% targeting DEX and/or observability.

Using observability to improve data quality and system reliability, building on the work of high-performing, AI-conversant employees and focusing on improving the digital end user experience can go a long way toward setting organizations up for AI success.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

The Latest

Pilots are everywhere, stakeholders are seeking results, businesses are pushing for new tools, and IT teams are being asked to make AI secure, reliable, and useful at scale. But as organizations move from testing AI to operationalizing it, many are discovering that the biggest barrier is not the model, the use case, or even the budget. It is the file data foundation within ...

Fast or cheap? For most of my career in engineering, speed and quality sat on opposite ends of a seesaw. The "OR" in "fast or cheap" was non-negotiable. It was expected that pushing for faster releases meant that something in quality would give way. Tightening quality controls meant the schedule slipped. Every engineering leader I know has lived some version of that tradeoff ... The seesaw is starting to level out ...

I have been building enterprise software for more than 20 years ... One thing stays true across all of it: You do not find out your foundation is wrong during the crisis. You find out when the debt comes due. For a lot of organizations, that bill is arriving now. New research ... puts hard numbers on something practitioners have been sensing for a while. The telemetry problem isn't coming. It's already here ...

The rapid growth of AI workloads is pushing traditional log management approaches to their limits, according to The State of Log Management 2026 report from Dynatrace. Modern logs have become critical to understanding, validating, and securing AI-driven decisions, helping organizations ensure reliability, compliance, and performance at scale. However, the volume and complexity of AI telemetry are overwhelming legacy tools ...

For years, secure connectivity has relied on a familiar pattern: route traffic back to centralized gateways, inspect it, and then allow access. This model worked when applications lived in a handful of data centers and users were largely confined to offices. That model is now under strain. Applications are distributed across clouds, users connect from everywhere, and real-time workloads demand performance that centralized inspection points struggle to deliver. As traffic volumes grow and latency expectations shrink, routing everything through a small number of control points has become both a performance bottleneck and a resilience risk. The future of secure connectivity requires a different approach ...

The AI experimentation phase is over, and the private cloud is where enterprise AI workloads are being deployed for security and scale, according to Private Cloud Outlook 2026, a new report from Broadcom ... 2026 marks an acceleration into a full AI tipping point. The shift is being shaped by three forces — costs, complexity, and control — that public cloud environments are increasingly failing to address for production AI at scale. Key findings from the report include ...

44% of organizations have reported an outage in the past year tied to suppressed or ignored alerts, and 78% had at least one incident where no alert was fired at all ... Engineers learned about failures from customers. That gap between what our tools report and what our customers experience is the problem DevOps teams have been quietly solving with GenAI tooling, even as most enterprises continue to run their NOCs on manual alert triage ...

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

The Status of Enterprise AI: AI Hype to Reality

Mike Marks
Riverbed

Organizations are gearing up to let the AI rubber hit the road in business initiatives, having spent the past several years implementing AI models mostly to improve IT and operations.

According to a recent survey, organizations see AI as critically important to their futures, with 94% of respondents saying that AI was a top priority of C-suite executives, and 64% of decision-makers saying they plan to use AI to drive growth initiatives and new business models over the next three years. Decision-makers acknowledge, however, that work is needed in order to take full advantage of AI's transformative capabilities. Only 37% said they are fully prepared to implement AI projects right now, but 86% said they expect to be ready by 2027 — presenting a mismatch of AI expectations versus reality.

Image
Riverbed

For IT leaders, a few hurdles stand in the way of AI success. They include concerns over data quality, security and the ability to implement projects. Understanding and addressing these concerns can give organizations a realistic view of where they stand in implementing AI — and balance out a certain level of overconfidence many organizations seem to have — to enable them to make the most of the technology's potential.

Data Quality a Top Concern

Perhaps the biggest concern is over the quality of data. Leaders understand that high-quality data is essential to training AI models and ensuring efficient performance — 85% said so — but most acknowledge that their own data is currently lacking in completeness and accuracy. Only 43% described their data as excellent for quantity and completeness, and 40% rated the accuracy and integrity of their data as excellent. Overall, 69% questioned the effectiveness of using their organization's data for AI.

Without improvements, data quality could become a major stumbling block, as 42% of decision-makers said that a lack of high-quality internal data for training AI models would prevent them from investing more in the technology.

Security-related issues also could deter further AI investments, with 43% citing cybersecurity risks and 36% identifying regulatory and compliance concerns as potential reasons to hold back. More than three-quarters of respondents (76%) are concerned that their use of AI could result in AI accessing their proprietary data in the public domain.

These factors play into questions about the ability to implement AI projects, which has sometimes been a struggle for some organizations. Implementation challenges are evident in the disparity between organizations' confidence in their AI abilities and the results of projects they've completed. Although 82% of decision-makers say their organizations are either significantly or slightly ahead of the competition in implementing AI, only 18% outperformed expectations while 23% underperformed and 59% met expectations.

Observability and Improved DEX Help Overcome AI Challenges

It's clear that organizations are focused on AI because of its potential to deliver substantial competitive advantages. And the research shows that high-performing companies, or growth companies, are those giving AI higher priority than moderate or low performers.

In moving forward, there are several interrelated factors organizations can focus on to help AI's potential become a reality.

Prioritize Observability. When it comes to improving IT and digital services, decision-makers emphasize the importance of observability, which collects and analyzes full-system telemetry to measure the health of a system, detect issues, identify dependencies and improve performance. Observability has been shown to have a significant impact on improving data quality — a top concern with moving forward on AI. 84% of respondents said they want an AI observability platform as opposed to implementing point products.

Tap Into the Successes of High-Performers. Research has also found a clear connection between those who made the most use of AI and those who performed the best. These "high performers" are those organizations with an average change in revenue of 10.5% or more, and they happen to be leveraging AI to its absolute full capabilities (67%) when compared to low performers (45%). Organizations looking to implement AI successfully, like high performers, should be prioritizing similar strategies to ensure performance of models and data. Confidence in data is significantly higher in the top performers when compared to the low performers (53% vs. 28%).

Focus on Improving the Digital Experience. Across all respondents, the survey showed that decision-makers were deploying different AI capabilities to improve digital user experience. 85% said AI-driven analytics improve user experience, while 86% said AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver an improved digital experience for end users.

Cultivate Young Employees. Millennial and Generation Z employees, who will comprise 74% of the workforce by 2030, are by far the most attuned to AI, with 52% of Gen Z and 39% of millennials having a favorable view of AI, as opposed to Generation X (8%) and baby boomers (1%). They also are the most insistent on good DEX. A Riverbed survey last year found that 68% of decision-makers said poor DEX would drive younger employees to leave the company, putting a company's AI strategy front and center for business growth too.

Conclusion

Organizations are moving in a positive direction, with 92% having formed a department or team to address some combination of AI, user experience and observability, with 57% dedicating an internal team or department to AI and 45% targeting DEX and/or observability.

Using observability to improve data quality and system reliability, building on the work of high-performing, AI-conversant employees and focusing on improving the digital end user experience can go a long way toward setting organizations up for AI success.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

The Latest

Pilots are everywhere, stakeholders are seeking results, businesses are pushing for new tools, and IT teams are being asked to make AI secure, reliable, and useful at scale. But as organizations move from testing AI to operationalizing it, many are discovering that the biggest barrier is not the model, the use case, or even the budget. It is the file data foundation within ...

Fast or cheap? For most of my career in engineering, speed and quality sat on opposite ends of a seesaw. The "OR" in "fast or cheap" was non-negotiable. It was expected that pushing for faster releases meant that something in quality would give way. Tightening quality controls meant the schedule slipped. Every engineering leader I know has lived some version of that tradeoff ... The seesaw is starting to level out ...

I have been building enterprise software for more than 20 years ... One thing stays true across all of it: You do not find out your foundation is wrong during the crisis. You find out when the debt comes due. For a lot of organizations, that bill is arriving now. New research ... puts hard numbers on something practitioners have been sensing for a while. The telemetry problem isn't coming. It's already here ...

The rapid growth of AI workloads is pushing traditional log management approaches to their limits, according to The State of Log Management 2026 report from Dynatrace. Modern logs have become critical to understanding, validating, and securing AI-driven decisions, helping organizations ensure reliability, compliance, and performance at scale. However, the volume and complexity of AI telemetry are overwhelming legacy tools ...

For years, secure connectivity has relied on a familiar pattern: route traffic back to centralized gateways, inspect it, and then allow access. This model worked when applications lived in a handful of data centers and users were largely confined to offices. That model is now under strain. Applications are distributed across clouds, users connect from everywhere, and real-time workloads demand performance that centralized inspection points struggle to deliver. As traffic volumes grow and latency expectations shrink, routing everything through a small number of control points has become both a performance bottleneck and a resilience risk. The future of secure connectivity requires a different approach ...

The AI experimentation phase is over, and the private cloud is where enterprise AI workloads are being deployed for security and scale, according to Private Cloud Outlook 2026, a new report from Broadcom ... 2026 marks an acceleration into a full AI tipping point. The shift is being shaped by three forces — costs, complexity, and control — that public cloud environments are increasingly failing to address for production AI at scale. Key findings from the report include ...

44% of organizations have reported an outage in the past year tied to suppressed or ignored alerts, and 78% had at least one incident where no alert was fired at all ... Engineers learned about failures from customers. That gap between what our tools report and what our customers experience is the problem DevOps teams have been quietly solving with GenAI tooling, even as most enterprises continue to run their NOCs on manual alert triage ...

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...