Skip to main content

The Status of Enterprise AI: AI Hype to Reality

Mike Marks
Riverbed

Organizations are gearing up to let the AI rubber hit the road in business initiatives, having spent the past several years implementing AI models mostly to improve IT and operations.

According to a recent survey, organizations see AI as critically important to their futures, with 94% of respondents saying that AI was a top priority of C-suite executives, and 64% of decision-makers saying they plan to use AI to drive growth initiatives and new business models over the next three years. Decision-makers acknowledge, however, that work is needed in order to take full advantage of AI's transformative capabilities. Only 37% said they are fully prepared to implement AI projects right now, but 86% said they expect to be ready by 2027 — presenting a mismatch of AI expectations versus reality.

Image
Riverbed

For IT leaders, a few hurdles stand in the way of AI success. They include concerns over data quality, security and the ability to implement projects. Understanding and addressing these concerns can give organizations a realistic view of where they stand in implementing AI — and balance out a certain level of overconfidence many organizations seem to have — to enable them to make the most of the technology's potential.

Data Quality a Top Concern

Perhaps the biggest concern is over the quality of data. Leaders understand that high-quality data is essential to training AI models and ensuring efficient performance — 85% said so — but most acknowledge that their own data is currently lacking in completeness and accuracy. Only 43% described their data as excellent for quantity and completeness, and 40% rated the accuracy and integrity of their data as excellent. Overall, 69% questioned the effectiveness of using their organization's data for AI.

Without improvements, data quality could become a major stumbling block, as 42% of decision-makers said that a lack of high-quality internal data for training AI models would prevent them from investing more in the technology.

Security-related issues also could deter further AI investments, with 43% citing cybersecurity risks and 36% identifying regulatory and compliance concerns as potential reasons to hold back. More than three-quarters of respondents (76%) are concerned that their use of AI could result in AI accessing their proprietary data in the public domain.

These factors play into questions about the ability to implement AI projects, which has sometimes been a struggle for some organizations. Implementation challenges are evident in the disparity between organizations' confidence in their AI abilities and the results of projects they've completed. Although 82% of decision-makers say their organizations are either significantly or slightly ahead of the competition in implementing AI, only 18% outperformed expectations while 23% underperformed and 59% met expectations.

Observability and Improved DEX Help Overcome AI Challenges

It's clear that organizations are focused on AI because of its potential to deliver substantial competitive advantages. And the research shows that high-performing companies, or growth companies, are those giving AI higher priority than moderate or low performers.

In moving forward, there are several interrelated factors organizations can focus on to help AI's potential become a reality.

Prioritize Observability. When it comes to improving IT and digital services, decision-makers emphasize the importance of observability, which collects and analyzes full-system telemetry to measure the health of a system, detect issues, identify dependencies and improve performance. Observability has been shown to have a significant impact on improving data quality — a top concern with moving forward on AI. 84% of respondents said they want an AI observability platform as opposed to implementing point products.

Tap Into the Successes of High-Performers. Research has also found a clear connection between those who made the most use of AI and those who performed the best. These "high performers" are those organizations with an average change in revenue of 10.5% or more, and they happen to be leveraging AI to its absolute full capabilities (67%) when compared to low performers (45%). Organizations looking to implement AI successfully, like high performers, should be prioritizing similar strategies to ensure performance of models and data. Confidence in data is significantly higher in the top performers when compared to the low performers (53% vs. 28%).

Focus on Improving the Digital Experience. Across all respondents, the survey showed that decision-makers were deploying different AI capabilities to improve digital user experience. 85% said AI-driven analytics improve user experience, while 86% said AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver an improved digital experience for end users.

Cultivate Young Employees. Millennial and Generation Z employees, who will comprise 74% of the workforce by 2030, are by far the most attuned to AI, with 52% of Gen Z and 39% of millennials having a favorable view of AI, as opposed to Generation X (8%) and baby boomers (1%). They also are the most insistent on good DEX. A Riverbed survey last year found that 68% of decision-makers said poor DEX would drive younger employees to leave the company, putting a company's AI strategy front and center for business growth too.

Conclusion

Organizations are moving in a positive direction, with 92% having formed a department or team to address some combination of AI, user experience and observability, with 57% dedicating an internal team or department to AI and 45% targeting DEX and/or observability.

Using observability to improve data quality and system reliability, building on the work of high-performing, AI-conversant employees and focusing on improving the digital end user experience can go a long way toward setting organizations up for AI success.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 12, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses purchasing new network observability solutions.... 

There's an image problem with mobile app security. While it's critical for highly regulated industries like financial services, it is often overlooked in others. This usually comes down to development priorities, which typically fall into three categories: user experience, app performance, and app security. When dealing with finite resources such as time, shifting priorities, and team skill sets, engineering teams often have to prioritize one over the others. Usually, security is the odd man out ...

Image
Guardsquare

IT outages, caused by poor-quality software updates, are no longer rare incidents but rather frequent occurrences, directly impacting over half of US consumers. According to the 2024 Software Failure Sentiment Report from Harness, many now equate these failures to critical public health crises ...

In just a few months, Google will again head to Washington DC and meet with the government for a two-week remedy trial to cement the fate of what happens to Chrome and its search business in the face of ongoing antitrust court case(s). Or, Google may proactively decide to make changes, putting the power in its hands to outline a suitable remedy. Regardless of the outcome, one thing is sure: there will be far more implications for AI than just a shift in Google's Search business ... 

Image
Chrome

In today's fast-paced digital world, Application Performance Monitoring (APM) is crucial for maintaining the health of an organization's digital ecosystem. However, the complexities of modern IT environments, including distributed architectures, hybrid clouds, and dynamic workloads, present significant challenges ... This blog explores the challenges of implementing application performance monitoring (APM) and offers strategies for overcoming them ...

Service disruptions remain a critical concern for IT and business executives, with 88% of respondents saying they believe another major incident will occur in the next 12 months, according to a study from PagerDuty ...

IT infrastructure (on-premises, cloud, or hybrid) is becoming larger and more complex. IT management tools need data to drive better decision making and more process automation to complement manual intervention by IT staff. That is why smart organizations invest in the systems and strategies needed to make their IT infrastructure more resilient in the event of disruption, and why many are turning to application performance monitoring (APM) in conjunction with high availability (HA) clusters ...

In today's data-driven world, the management of databases has become increasingly complex and critical. The following are findings from Redgate's 2025 The State of the Database Landscape report ...

With the 2027 deadline for SAP S/4HANA migrations fast approaching, organizations are accelerating their transition plans ... For organizations that intend to remain on SAP ECC in the near-term, the focus has shifted to improving operational efficiencies and meeting demands for faster cycle times ...

As applications expand and systems intertwine, performance bottlenecks, quality lapses, and disjointed pipelines threaten progress. To stay ahead, leading organizations are turning to three foundational strategies: developer-first observability, API platform adoption, and sustainable test growth ...

The Status of Enterprise AI: AI Hype to Reality

Mike Marks
Riverbed

Organizations are gearing up to let the AI rubber hit the road in business initiatives, having spent the past several years implementing AI models mostly to improve IT and operations.

According to a recent survey, organizations see AI as critically important to their futures, with 94% of respondents saying that AI was a top priority of C-suite executives, and 64% of decision-makers saying they plan to use AI to drive growth initiatives and new business models over the next three years. Decision-makers acknowledge, however, that work is needed in order to take full advantage of AI's transformative capabilities. Only 37% said they are fully prepared to implement AI projects right now, but 86% said they expect to be ready by 2027 — presenting a mismatch of AI expectations versus reality.

Image
Riverbed

For IT leaders, a few hurdles stand in the way of AI success. They include concerns over data quality, security and the ability to implement projects. Understanding and addressing these concerns can give organizations a realistic view of where they stand in implementing AI — and balance out a certain level of overconfidence many organizations seem to have — to enable them to make the most of the technology's potential.

Data Quality a Top Concern

Perhaps the biggest concern is over the quality of data. Leaders understand that high-quality data is essential to training AI models and ensuring efficient performance — 85% said so — but most acknowledge that their own data is currently lacking in completeness and accuracy. Only 43% described their data as excellent for quantity and completeness, and 40% rated the accuracy and integrity of their data as excellent. Overall, 69% questioned the effectiveness of using their organization's data for AI.

Without improvements, data quality could become a major stumbling block, as 42% of decision-makers said that a lack of high-quality internal data for training AI models would prevent them from investing more in the technology.

Security-related issues also could deter further AI investments, with 43% citing cybersecurity risks and 36% identifying regulatory and compliance concerns as potential reasons to hold back. More than three-quarters of respondents (76%) are concerned that their use of AI could result in AI accessing their proprietary data in the public domain.

These factors play into questions about the ability to implement AI projects, which has sometimes been a struggle for some organizations. Implementation challenges are evident in the disparity between organizations' confidence in their AI abilities and the results of projects they've completed. Although 82% of decision-makers say their organizations are either significantly or slightly ahead of the competition in implementing AI, only 18% outperformed expectations while 23% underperformed and 59% met expectations.

Observability and Improved DEX Help Overcome AI Challenges

It's clear that organizations are focused on AI because of its potential to deliver substantial competitive advantages. And the research shows that high-performing companies, or growth companies, are those giving AI higher priority than moderate or low performers.

In moving forward, there are several interrelated factors organizations can focus on to help AI's potential become a reality.

Prioritize Observability. When it comes to improving IT and digital services, decision-makers emphasize the importance of observability, which collects and analyzes full-system telemetry to measure the health of a system, detect issues, identify dependencies and improve performance. Observability has been shown to have a significant impact on improving data quality — a top concern with moving forward on AI. 84% of respondents said they want an AI observability platform as opposed to implementing point products.

Tap Into the Successes of High-Performers. Research has also found a clear connection between those who made the most use of AI and those who performed the best. These "high performers" are those organizations with an average change in revenue of 10.5% or more, and they happen to be leveraging AI to its absolute full capabilities (67%) when compared to low performers (45%). Organizations looking to implement AI successfully, like high performers, should be prioritizing similar strategies to ensure performance of models and data. Confidence in data is significantly higher in the top performers when compared to the low performers (53% vs. 28%).

Focus on Improving the Digital Experience. Across all respondents, the survey showed that decision-makers were deploying different AI capabilities to improve digital user experience. 85% said AI-driven analytics improve user experience, while 86% said AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver an improved digital experience for end users.

Cultivate Young Employees. Millennial and Generation Z employees, who will comprise 74% of the workforce by 2030, are by far the most attuned to AI, with 52% of Gen Z and 39% of millennials having a favorable view of AI, as opposed to Generation X (8%) and baby boomers (1%). They also are the most insistent on good DEX. A Riverbed survey last year found that 68% of decision-makers said poor DEX would drive younger employees to leave the company, putting a company's AI strategy front and center for business growth too.

Conclusion

Organizations are moving in a positive direction, with 92% having formed a department or team to address some combination of AI, user experience and observability, with 57% dedicating an internal team or department to AI and 45% targeting DEX and/or observability.

Using observability to improve data quality and system reliability, building on the work of high-performing, AI-conversant employees and focusing on improving the digital end user experience can go a long way toward setting organizations up for AI success.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 12, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses purchasing new network observability solutions.... 

There's an image problem with mobile app security. While it's critical for highly regulated industries like financial services, it is often overlooked in others. This usually comes down to development priorities, which typically fall into three categories: user experience, app performance, and app security. When dealing with finite resources such as time, shifting priorities, and team skill sets, engineering teams often have to prioritize one over the others. Usually, security is the odd man out ...

Image
Guardsquare

IT outages, caused by poor-quality software updates, are no longer rare incidents but rather frequent occurrences, directly impacting over half of US consumers. According to the 2024 Software Failure Sentiment Report from Harness, many now equate these failures to critical public health crises ...

In just a few months, Google will again head to Washington DC and meet with the government for a two-week remedy trial to cement the fate of what happens to Chrome and its search business in the face of ongoing antitrust court case(s). Or, Google may proactively decide to make changes, putting the power in its hands to outline a suitable remedy. Regardless of the outcome, one thing is sure: there will be far more implications for AI than just a shift in Google's Search business ... 

Image
Chrome

In today's fast-paced digital world, Application Performance Monitoring (APM) is crucial for maintaining the health of an organization's digital ecosystem. However, the complexities of modern IT environments, including distributed architectures, hybrid clouds, and dynamic workloads, present significant challenges ... This blog explores the challenges of implementing application performance monitoring (APM) and offers strategies for overcoming them ...

Service disruptions remain a critical concern for IT and business executives, with 88% of respondents saying they believe another major incident will occur in the next 12 months, according to a study from PagerDuty ...

IT infrastructure (on-premises, cloud, or hybrid) is becoming larger and more complex. IT management tools need data to drive better decision making and more process automation to complement manual intervention by IT staff. That is why smart organizations invest in the systems and strategies needed to make their IT infrastructure more resilient in the event of disruption, and why many are turning to application performance monitoring (APM) in conjunction with high availability (HA) clusters ...

In today's data-driven world, the management of databases has become increasingly complex and critical. The following are findings from Redgate's 2025 The State of the Database Landscape report ...

With the 2027 deadline for SAP S/4HANA migrations fast approaching, organizations are accelerating their transition plans ... For organizations that intend to remain on SAP ECC in the near-term, the focus has shifted to improving operational efficiencies and meeting demands for faster cycle times ...

As applications expand and systems intertwine, performance bottlenecks, quality lapses, and disjointed pipelines threaten progress. To stay ahead, leading organizations are turning to three foundational strategies: developer-first observability, API platform adoption, and sustainable test growth ...