Skip to main content

The Status of Enterprise AI: AI Hype to Reality

Mike Marks
Riverbed

Organizations are gearing up to let the AI rubber hit the road in business initiatives, having spent the past several years implementing AI models mostly to improve IT and operations.

According to a recent survey, organizations see AI as critically important to their futures, with 94% of respondents saying that AI was a top priority of C-suite executives, and 64% of decision-makers saying they plan to use AI to drive growth initiatives and new business models over the next three years. Decision-makers acknowledge, however, that work is needed in order to take full advantage of AI's transformative capabilities. Only 37% said they are fully prepared to implement AI projects right now, but 86% said they expect to be ready by 2027 — presenting a mismatch of AI expectations versus reality.

Image
Riverbed

For IT leaders, a few hurdles stand in the way of AI success. They include concerns over data quality, security and the ability to implement projects. Understanding and addressing these concerns can give organizations a realistic view of where they stand in implementing AI — and balance out a certain level of overconfidence many organizations seem to have — to enable them to make the most of the technology's potential.

Data Quality a Top Concern

Perhaps the biggest concern is over the quality of data. Leaders understand that high-quality data is essential to training AI models and ensuring efficient performance — 85% said so — but most acknowledge that their own data is currently lacking in completeness and accuracy. Only 43% described their data as excellent for quantity and completeness, and 40% rated the accuracy and integrity of their data as excellent. Overall, 69% questioned the effectiveness of using their organization's data for AI.

Without improvements, data quality could become a major stumbling block, as 42% of decision-makers said that a lack of high-quality internal data for training AI models would prevent them from investing more in the technology.

Security-related issues also could deter further AI investments, with 43% citing cybersecurity risks and 36% identifying regulatory and compliance concerns as potential reasons to hold back. More than three-quarters of respondents (76%) are concerned that their use of AI could result in AI accessing their proprietary data in the public domain.

These factors play into questions about the ability to implement AI projects, which has sometimes been a struggle for some organizations. Implementation challenges are evident in the disparity between organizations' confidence in their AI abilities and the results of projects they've completed. Although 82% of decision-makers say their organizations are either significantly or slightly ahead of the competition in implementing AI, only 18% outperformed expectations while 23% underperformed and 59% met expectations.

Observability and Improved DEX Help Overcome AI Challenges

It's clear that organizations are focused on AI because of its potential to deliver substantial competitive advantages. And the research shows that high-performing companies, or growth companies, are those giving AI higher priority than moderate or low performers.

In moving forward, there are several interrelated factors organizations can focus on to help AI's potential become a reality.

Prioritize Observability. When it comes to improving IT and digital services, decision-makers emphasize the importance of observability, which collects and analyzes full-system telemetry to measure the health of a system, detect issues, identify dependencies and improve performance. Observability has been shown to have a significant impact on improving data quality — a top concern with moving forward on AI. 84% of respondents said they want an AI observability platform as opposed to implementing point products.

Tap Into the Successes of High-Performers. Research has also found a clear connection between those who made the most use of AI and those who performed the best. These "high performers" are those organizations with an average change in revenue of 10.5% or more, and they happen to be leveraging AI to its absolute full capabilities (67%) when compared to low performers (45%). Organizations looking to implement AI successfully, like high performers, should be prioritizing similar strategies to ensure performance of models and data. Confidence in data is significantly higher in the top performers when compared to the low performers (53% vs. 28%).

Focus on Improving the Digital Experience. Across all respondents, the survey showed that decision-makers were deploying different AI capabilities to improve digital user experience. 85% said AI-driven analytics improve user experience, while 86% said AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver an improved digital experience for end users.

Cultivate Young Employees. Millennial and Generation Z employees, who will comprise 74% of the workforce by 2030, are by far the most attuned to AI, with 52% of Gen Z and 39% of millennials having a favorable view of AI, as opposed to Generation X (8%) and baby boomers (1%). They also are the most insistent on good DEX. A Riverbed survey last year found that 68% of decision-makers said poor DEX would drive younger employees to leave the company, putting a company's AI strategy front and center for business growth too.

Conclusion

Organizations are moving in a positive direction, with 92% having formed a department or team to address some combination of AI, user experience and observability, with 57% dedicating an internal team or department to AI and 45% targeting DEX and/or observability.

Using observability to improve data quality and system reliability, building on the work of high-performing, AI-conversant employees and focusing on improving the digital end user experience can go a long way toward setting organizations up for AI success.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

The Status of Enterprise AI: AI Hype to Reality

Mike Marks
Riverbed

Organizations are gearing up to let the AI rubber hit the road in business initiatives, having spent the past several years implementing AI models mostly to improve IT and operations.

According to a recent survey, organizations see AI as critically important to their futures, with 94% of respondents saying that AI was a top priority of C-suite executives, and 64% of decision-makers saying they plan to use AI to drive growth initiatives and new business models over the next three years. Decision-makers acknowledge, however, that work is needed in order to take full advantage of AI's transformative capabilities. Only 37% said they are fully prepared to implement AI projects right now, but 86% said they expect to be ready by 2027 — presenting a mismatch of AI expectations versus reality.

Image
Riverbed

For IT leaders, a few hurdles stand in the way of AI success. They include concerns over data quality, security and the ability to implement projects. Understanding and addressing these concerns can give organizations a realistic view of where they stand in implementing AI — and balance out a certain level of overconfidence many organizations seem to have — to enable them to make the most of the technology's potential.

Data Quality a Top Concern

Perhaps the biggest concern is over the quality of data. Leaders understand that high-quality data is essential to training AI models and ensuring efficient performance — 85% said so — but most acknowledge that their own data is currently lacking in completeness and accuracy. Only 43% described their data as excellent for quantity and completeness, and 40% rated the accuracy and integrity of their data as excellent. Overall, 69% questioned the effectiveness of using their organization's data for AI.

Without improvements, data quality could become a major stumbling block, as 42% of decision-makers said that a lack of high-quality internal data for training AI models would prevent them from investing more in the technology.

Security-related issues also could deter further AI investments, with 43% citing cybersecurity risks and 36% identifying regulatory and compliance concerns as potential reasons to hold back. More than three-quarters of respondents (76%) are concerned that their use of AI could result in AI accessing their proprietary data in the public domain.

These factors play into questions about the ability to implement AI projects, which has sometimes been a struggle for some organizations. Implementation challenges are evident in the disparity between organizations' confidence in their AI abilities and the results of projects they've completed. Although 82% of decision-makers say their organizations are either significantly or slightly ahead of the competition in implementing AI, only 18% outperformed expectations while 23% underperformed and 59% met expectations.

Observability and Improved DEX Help Overcome AI Challenges

It's clear that organizations are focused on AI because of its potential to deliver substantial competitive advantages. And the research shows that high-performing companies, or growth companies, are those giving AI higher priority than moderate or low performers.

In moving forward, there are several interrelated factors organizations can focus on to help AI's potential become a reality.

Prioritize Observability. When it comes to improving IT and digital services, decision-makers emphasize the importance of observability, which collects and analyzes full-system telemetry to measure the health of a system, detect issues, identify dependencies and improve performance. Observability has been shown to have a significant impact on improving data quality — a top concern with moving forward on AI. 84% of respondents said they want an AI observability platform as opposed to implementing point products.

Tap Into the Successes of High-Performers. Research has also found a clear connection between those who made the most use of AI and those who performed the best. These "high performers" are those organizations with an average change in revenue of 10.5% or more, and they happen to be leveraging AI to its absolute full capabilities (67%) when compared to low performers (45%). Organizations looking to implement AI successfully, like high performers, should be prioritizing similar strategies to ensure performance of models and data. Confidence in data is significantly higher in the top performers when compared to the low performers (53% vs. 28%).

Focus on Improving the Digital Experience. Across all respondents, the survey showed that decision-makers were deploying different AI capabilities to improve digital user experience. 85% said AI-driven analytics improve user experience, while 86% said AI automation is important to improve IT efficiency and deliver an improved digital experience for end users.

Cultivate Young Employees. Millennial and Generation Z employees, who will comprise 74% of the workforce by 2030, are by far the most attuned to AI, with 52% of Gen Z and 39% of millennials having a favorable view of AI, as opposed to Generation X (8%) and baby boomers (1%). They also are the most insistent on good DEX. A Riverbed survey last year found that 68% of decision-makers said poor DEX would drive younger employees to leave the company, putting a company's AI strategy front and center for business growth too.

Conclusion

Organizations are moving in a positive direction, with 92% having formed a department or team to address some combination of AI, user experience and observability, with 57% dedicating an internal team or department to AI and 45% targeting DEX and/or observability.

Using observability to improve data quality and system reliability, building on the work of high-performing, AI-conversant employees and focusing on improving the digital end user experience can go a long way toward setting organizations up for AI success.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...