Skip to main content

Streamlining Anomaly Detection and Remediation with Edge Observability

Ozan Unlu
Edge Delta

Over the past several years, architectures have become increasingly distributed and datasets have grown at unprecedented rates. Despite these shifts, the tools available to detect issues within your most critical applications and services have remained stuck in a centralized model. In this centralized model, teams must collect, ingest, and index datasets before asking questions upon them to derive any value.

This approach worked well five years ago for most use cases, and now, it still suffices for batching, common information models, correlation, threat feeds, and more. However, when it comes to real-time analytics at large scale — specifically anomaly detection and resolution — there are inherent limitations. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for DevOps and SRE teams to minimize the impact of issues and ensure high-quality end-user experiences.

In this blog, I'm going to propose a new approach to support real-time use cases — edge observability — that enables you to detect issues as they occur and resolve them in minutes. But first, let' s walk through the current centralized model and the limitations it imposes on DevOps and SRE teams.

Centralized Observability Limits Visibility, Proactive Alerting, and Performance

The challenges created by centralized observability are largely a byproduct of exponential data growth. Shipping, ingesting, and indexing terabytes or even petabytes of data each day is difficult and cost-prohibitive for many businesses. So, teams are forced to predict which datasets meet the criteria to be centralized. The rest is banished to a cold storage destination, where you cannot apply real-time analytics on top of the dataset. For DevOps and SRE teams, this means less visibility and creates the potential that an issue could be present in a non-indexed dataset — meaning the team is unable to detect it.

On top of that, engineers must manually define monitoring logic within their observability platforms to uncover issues in real-time. This is not only time-consuming but puts the onus on the engineer to know every pattern they' d like to alert on upfront. This approach is reactive in nature since teams are often looking for behaviors they' re aware of or have seen before.

Root causing an issue and writing an effective unit test for it has been around for ages, but what happens when you need to detect and resolve an issue that' s never occurred before?

Lastly, the whole process is slow and begs the question, "how fast is real-time?"

Engineers must collect, compress, encrypt, and transfer data to a centralized cloud or data center. Then, they must unpack, ingest, index, and query the data before they can dashboard and alert. These steps naturally create a delta between when an issue actually occurs and when it's alerted upon. This delta grows as volumes increase and query performance degrades.

What is Edge Observability?

To detect issues in real-time and repair them in minutes, teams need to complement traditional observability with distributed stream processing and machine learning. Edge observability uses these technologies to push intelligence upstream to the data source. In other words, it calls for starting the analysis on raw telemetry within an organization' s computing environment before routing to downstream platforms.

By starting to analyze your telemetry data at the source, you no longer need to choose which datasets to centralize and which to neglect. Instead, you can process data as it' s created unlocking complete visibility into every dataset — and in turn, every issue.

Machine learning complements this approach by automatically:

■ baselining the datasets

■ detecting changes in behavior

■ determining the likelihood of an anomaly or issue

■ triggering an alert in real-time

Because these operations are all running at the source, alerts are triggered orders of magnitude faster than is possible with the old centralized approach.

It' s critical to point out that the use of machine learning wipes out the need for engineers to build and maintain complex monitoring logic within an observability platform. Instead, the machine learning picks up on negative patterns — even unknown unknowns — and surfaces the full context of the issue (including the raw data associated with it) to streamline root-cause analysis. Though operationalizing machine learning for real-time insights into high volumes has always proved a challenge at scale, distributing this machine learning gives teams the ability to have full access and deep views into all data sets.

Edge Observability Cuts MTTR from Hours to Minutes

Taking this approach, teams can detect anomalous changes in system behavior as soon as they occur and then pinpoint the affected systems/components in a few clicks — all without requiring an engineer to build regex, define parse statements, or run manual queries.

Organizations of all sizes and backgrounds are seeing the value of edge observability. Some are using it to dramatically reduce debugging times while others are gaining visibility into issues they didn' t know were going on. In all situations, it' s clear that analyzing massive volumes of data in real-time calls for a new approach — and this will only become clearer as data continues to grow exponentially. This new approach starts at the edge.

Ozan Unlu is CEO of Edge Delta

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

Streamlining Anomaly Detection and Remediation with Edge Observability

Ozan Unlu
Edge Delta

Over the past several years, architectures have become increasingly distributed and datasets have grown at unprecedented rates. Despite these shifts, the tools available to detect issues within your most critical applications and services have remained stuck in a centralized model. In this centralized model, teams must collect, ingest, and index datasets before asking questions upon them to derive any value.

This approach worked well five years ago for most use cases, and now, it still suffices for batching, common information models, correlation, threat feeds, and more. However, when it comes to real-time analytics at large scale — specifically anomaly detection and resolution — there are inherent limitations. As a result, it has become increasingly difficult for DevOps and SRE teams to minimize the impact of issues and ensure high-quality end-user experiences.

In this blog, I'm going to propose a new approach to support real-time use cases — edge observability — that enables you to detect issues as they occur and resolve them in minutes. But first, let' s walk through the current centralized model and the limitations it imposes on DevOps and SRE teams.

Centralized Observability Limits Visibility, Proactive Alerting, and Performance

The challenges created by centralized observability are largely a byproduct of exponential data growth. Shipping, ingesting, and indexing terabytes or even petabytes of data each day is difficult and cost-prohibitive for many businesses. So, teams are forced to predict which datasets meet the criteria to be centralized. The rest is banished to a cold storage destination, where you cannot apply real-time analytics on top of the dataset. For DevOps and SRE teams, this means less visibility and creates the potential that an issue could be present in a non-indexed dataset — meaning the team is unable to detect it.

On top of that, engineers must manually define monitoring logic within their observability platforms to uncover issues in real-time. This is not only time-consuming but puts the onus on the engineer to know every pattern they' d like to alert on upfront. This approach is reactive in nature since teams are often looking for behaviors they' re aware of or have seen before.

Root causing an issue and writing an effective unit test for it has been around for ages, but what happens when you need to detect and resolve an issue that' s never occurred before?

Lastly, the whole process is slow and begs the question, "how fast is real-time?"

Engineers must collect, compress, encrypt, and transfer data to a centralized cloud or data center. Then, they must unpack, ingest, index, and query the data before they can dashboard and alert. These steps naturally create a delta between when an issue actually occurs and when it's alerted upon. This delta grows as volumes increase and query performance degrades.

What is Edge Observability?

To detect issues in real-time and repair them in minutes, teams need to complement traditional observability with distributed stream processing and machine learning. Edge observability uses these technologies to push intelligence upstream to the data source. In other words, it calls for starting the analysis on raw telemetry within an organization' s computing environment before routing to downstream platforms.

By starting to analyze your telemetry data at the source, you no longer need to choose which datasets to centralize and which to neglect. Instead, you can process data as it' s created unlocking complete visibility into every dataset — and in turn, every issue.

Machine learning complements this approach by automatically:

■ baselining the datasets

■ detecting changes in behavior

■ determining the likelihood of an anomaly or issue

■ triggering an alert in real-time

Because these operations are all running at the source, alerts are triggered orders of magnitude faster than is possible with the old centralized approach.

It' s critical to point out that the use of machine learning wipes out the need for engineers to build and maintain complex monitoring logic within an observability platform. Instead, the machine learning picks up on negative patterns — even unknown unknowns — and surfaces the full context of the issue (including the raw data associated with it) to streamline root-cause analysis. Though operationalizing machine learning for real-time insights into high volumes has always proved a challenge at scale, distributing this machine learning gives teams the ability to have full access and deep views into all data sets.

Edge Observability Cuts MTTR from Hours to Minutes

Taking this approach, teams can detect anomalous changes in system behavior as soon as they occur and then pinpoint the affected systems/components in a few clicks — all without requiring an engineer to build regex, define parse statements, or run manual queries.

Organizations of all sizes and backgrounds are seeing the value of edge observability. Some are using it to dramatically reduce debugging times while others are gaining visibility into issues they didn' t know were going on. In all situations, it' s clear that analyzing massive volumes of data in real-time calls for a new approach — and this will only become clearer as data continues to grow exponentially. This new approach starts at the edge.

Ozan Unlu is CEO of Edge Delta

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...