According to an independent survey of financial IT investment decision makers in international enterprises, almost 60% of respondents have no overall understanding how an IT budget cut impacts their business performance or risk exposure.
The study further reveals that barely 4% determine their IT budget in accordance with the company’s actual business strategy or an IT portfolio analysis. As a consequence, more than 90% of the participants admit that they base their IT budget on industry benchmarks - as an arbitrary percentage of revenue - or simply tweak the previous year’s budget.
Another survey earlier this year showed that high quality information on IT landscapes in organizations is infrequent. A study by Nucleus Research showed that IT decision makers on average are constrained to deal with data that is on average 14 months old and only 55% correct.
The intention of the new study was to explore how financial IT decision makers are affected by the lack of reliable information. The results show that IT investment decisions are rarely based on reliable data and that decision processes are slowed down significantly by a lack of information on demand. As a result, only 30% of financial decision makers think their IT portfolios are fully aligned with business strategy and less than 14% think they can adjust them very quickly to changes in business.
Some Key Findings:
The situation – lack of information on demand:
* Less than half of the respondents (46.1 %) say they have a central system for analyzing, forecasting and measuring changes made in their IT portfolio.
* A minority of 32.5% is running standard reports to measure the alignment of their IT portfolio with current business requirements; the majority relies on ad-hoc analysis by either the IT department (32.2%) or a business department (27.5%).
* 85% of respondents do not have automatically-generated insight on the impact of a budget cut on risk exposure and business performance; one in five participants even has to wait longer than a month for the information, slowing down the decision processes dramatically.
* Only 15 % of the decision makers maintain that they have instant access to reliable information about the impact of budget cutbacks on the business performance and risk exposure.
The result – flat-rate budgeting and too little responsiveness:
* Nearly 60% of the financial decision makers do not believe that they have a clear understanding about where and how IT budget cutbacks could impact the business performance and possible risks.
* Barely 4% of the participants state that their budgeting is based on their business strategy and on an IT portfolio analysis. In contrast, over 90 % base their budget on previous year’s spending (28.3%) or an industry benchmark (61.3%) rather than their specific enterprise situation.
* Only 13.5 % can react very quickly to changes; one in five admits to reacting slowly or very slowly.
* Only 29.3% consider their IT portfolios as fully aligned; one in five concede that they are aligned only partly or even hardly.
The 10-question survey, conducted by IDG Business Research Service, canvassed CFOs and financial decision makers in large international corporations with more than 1,000 employees in August and September 2011 by phone. It was commissioned by alfabet AG, a provider of strategic IT planning and Business IT Management solutions.
The Latest
People want to be doing more engaging work, yet their day often gets overrun by addressing urgent IT tickets. But thanks to advances in AI "vibe coding," where a user describes what they want in plain English and the AI turns it into working code, IT teams can automate ticketing workflows and offload much of that work. Password resets that used to take 5 minutes per request now get resolved automatically ...
Governments and social platforms face an escalating challenge: hyperrealistic synthetic media now spreads faster than legacy moderation systems can react. From pandemic-related conspiracies to manipulated election content, disinformation has moved beyond "false text" into the realm of convincing audiovisual deception ...
Traditional monitoring often stops at uptime and server health without any integrated insights. Cross-platform observability covers not just infrastructure telemetry but also client-side behavior, distributed service interactions, and the contextual data that connects them. Emerging technologies like OpenTelemetry, eBPF, and AI-driven anomaly detection have made this vision more achievable, but only if organizations ground their observability strategy in well-defined pillars. Here are the five foundational pillars of cross-platform observability that modern engineering teams should focus on for seamless platform performance ...
For all the attention AI receives in corporate slide decks and strategic roadmaps, many businesses are struggling to translate that ambition into something that holds up at scale. At least, that's the picture that emerged from a recent Forrester study commissioned by Tines ...
From smart factories and autonomous vehicles to real-time analytics and intelligent building systems, the demand for instant, local data processing is exploding. To meet these needs, organizations are leaning into edge computing. The promise? Faster performance, reduced latency and less strain on centralized infrastructure. But there's a catch: Not every network is ready to support edge deployments ...
Every digital customer interaction, every cloud deployment, and every AI model depends on the same foundation: the ability to see, understand, and act on data in real time ... Recent data from Splunk confirms that 74% of the business leaders believe observability is essential to monitoring critical business processes, and 66% feel it's key to understanding user journeys. Because while the unknown is inevitable, observability makes it manageable. Let's explore why ...
Organizations that perform regular audits and assessments of AI system performance and compliance are over three times more likely to achieve high GenAI value than organizations that do not, according to a survey by Gartner ...
Kubernetes has become the backbone of cloud infrastructure, but it's also one of its biggest cost drivers. Recent research shows that 98% of senior IT leaders say Kubernetes now drives cloud spend, yet 91% still can't optimize it effectively. After years of adoption, most organizations have moved past discovery. They know container sprawl, idle resources and reactive scaling inflate costs. What they don't know is how to fix it ...
Artificial intelligence is no longer a future investment. It's already embedded in how we work — whether through copilots in productivity apps, real-time transcription tools in meetings, or machine learning models fueling analytics and personalization. But while enterprise adoption accelerates, there's one critical area many leaders have yet to examine: Can your network actually support AI at the speed your users expect? ...
The more technology businesses invest in, the more potential attack surfaces they have that can be exploited. Without the right continuity plans in place, the disruptions caused by these attacks can bring operations to a standstill and cause irreparable damage to an organization. It's essential to take the time now to ensure your business has the right tools, processes, and recovery initiatives in place to weather any type of IT disaster that comes up. Here are some effective strategies you can follow to achieve this ...