Skip to main content

Take the War Out of the War Room

Nik Koutsoukos

The development of new and more complex business technologies happens so quickly now that they are starting to outpace the rate at which IT organizations can effectively monitor the entire IT infrastructure and react to problems. This is particularly true as more enterprises adopt a hybrid model with some resources managed in the data center and some in cloud or SaaS-based environments. Simultaneously, IT organizations have become increasingly siloed as different personnel develop skillsets specific to different pieces of the IT infrastructure, such as database management, the network, information security, etc.

As a result, the “war room” – where IT personnel gather to diagnose and fix a problem – more often than not devolves into a session of finger pointing and delays. Remedying this situation demands a new approach to managing performance that enables IT to become more proactive instead of reactive, and more collaborative instead of siloed.

Riverbed recently held a webinar on this topic, and one of our presenters was Forrester Vice President and Principal Analyst Jean-Pierre Garbani. He opened his remarks with a statement that nicely summarizes how predictive analytics technologies have radically reshaped how any company does (or should do) business: “Every company board, IT organization and leadership team should assume that there are – or will be – new ways to more efficiently service customers.”

In other words, counting on the luxury of being able to time the development and release of new products, applications or services to slow-moving market trends is a thing of the past. Just ask the taxicab industry. After more than a century of enjoying a monopoly, it suddenly finds itself in a battle for its life against data-driven services like Uber and Lyft. Or consider the examples of Kodak, Blockbuster, Tower Records or Borders for evidence of how quickly a long-established business model can become obsolete very quickly.

Today companies can collect massive amounts of data and use predictive analytics technologies to determine and use invaluable information such as customer buying trends, supply chain capacity, commodity price futures, or to provide customers with data-driven offers. Enterprises are pouring money and energy into creating innovative applications and getting them to market faster, better and cheaper. Agile and DevOps capabilities can reduce release cycles from months to mere days, and the funding for these investments typically comes by spending reductions in infrastructure.

These complexities can quickly overwhelm human abilities and makes the job of resolving problems and maintaining systems increasingly difficult and time-consuming. That impacts service quality. Forrester has conducted a number of surveys and found that 56 percent of IT organizations resolve less than 75 percent of application performance problems in 24 hours, and in some cases, those performance issues can lag for months before resolution. Consider as examples outages that affect services like Gmail or Dropbox.

The root of the problem lies with the fact that IT grew up around domains such as the network, systems, applications, databases, etc., and they needed domain data to do their jobs. That has driven a proliferation of domain-centric point tools, which helps each domain group, but also means that for even very simple transactions, domain teams only see part of the transaction, such as packet data or metrics from an app server. This incomplete visibility means domain teams see different things due to inconsistent data sets and differing analytic approaches. That leads to a lack of collaboration, warring tribes, and ultimately conflicting conclusions that inhibit fast time to resolution.

For example, last year Adobe’s move to cloud-based software back fired momentarily when database maintenance resulted in application availability issues. The company’s Creative Cloud service was unavailable for about a day, leaving users unable to access the web versions of apps such as Photoshop and Premiere. In total, the outage was said to have impacted at least a million subscribers. Other Adobe-related products were impacted during the downtime as well, including Adobe's Business Catalyst analytics tool. The company has since implemented procedures to prevent a similar outage from happening again.

This instance highlights the area where companies typically struggle to solve performance issues. Once a problem occurs, it usually doesn’t take long for a frustrated employee or customer to raise it with IT, and once the specific cause is identified, fixing and validating that fix should not take long. Where the delays occur is in the middle of that timeline: the diagnosis, or what Forrester refers to as the “Mean Time to Know” (MTTK).

Because an IT organization is typically divided into independent silos that have little interaction with each other, the diagnosis process cannot be a collaborative effort. The war room where personnel gather to battle the problem becomes a war against each other. Instead of one collaborative effort, each silo uses its own specialized tools to evaluate the issue, and can typically only determine the fault lies with another group, but does not know which one. So the problem gets passed from group to group, a tedious and time-wasting exercise.

We will always have different, specialized groups within one IT organization to oversee services and applications such as end-user experiences, application monitoring, database monitoring, transaction mapping and infrastructure monitoring. What must change is the elimination of the individual dashboards each group uses to monitor its own domains. The key is to roll all of that reporting information in real-time into one global dashboard that provides broad domain monitoring capabilities that can be abstracted and analyzed in a way that focuses on services and transactions. Providing this single source of truth will reconcile technology silos and support better incident and problem management processes.

In other words, you take the war out of the war room. Each participant can find the right information needed to perform his or her tasks while also sharing that information with their peers so they can do the same.

Implementing this new approach to performance management will be a radical change for many organizations, and there may be initial resistance to overcome as groups worry their individual roles are at risk of marginalization. Again, the ultimate goal is not to eliminate specialized groups within one IT organization, it is to improve the collaboration among those groups. The result is performance management that is much less reactive and must wait for a problem to occur before taking action. Universal real-time monitoring can enable IT to anticipate when and where a problem may arise and fix it before the end user or customer even notices it. The most productive end user and happiest customer can often be the ones you never hear from because their experiences are always positive. That kind of silence is golden.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Take the War Out of the War Room

Nik Koutsoukos

The development of new and more complex business technologies happens so quickly now that they are starting to outpace the rate at which IT organizations can effectively monitor the entire IT infrastructure and react to problems. This is particularly true as more enterprises adopt a hybrid model with some resources managed in the data center and some in cloud or SaaS-based environments. Simultaneously, IT organizations have become increasingly siloed as different personnel develop skillsets specific to different pieces of the IT infrastructure, such as database management, the network, information security, etc.

As a result, the “war room” – where IT personnel gather to diagnose and fix a problem – more often than not devolves into a session of finger pointing and delays. Remedying this situation demands a new approach to managing performance that enables IT to become more proactive instead of reactive, and more collaborative instead of siloed.

Riverbed recently held a webinar on this topic, and one of our presenters was Forrester Vice President and Principal Analyst Jean-Pierre Garbani. He opened his remarks with a statement that nicely summarizes how predictive analytics technologies have radically reshaped how any company does (or should do) business: “Every company board, IT organization and leadership team should assume that there are – or will be – new ways to more efficiently service customers.”

In other words, counting on the luxury of being able to time the development and release of new products, applications or services to slow-moving market trends is a thing of the past. Just ask the taxicab industry. After more than a century of enjoying a monopoly, it suddenly finds itself in a battle for its life against data-driven services like Uber and Lyft. Or consider the examples of Kodak, Blockbuster, Tower Records or Borders for evidence of how quickly a long-established business model can become obsolete very quickly.

Today companies can collect massive amounts of data and use predictive analytics technologies to determine and use invaluable information such as customer buying trends, supply chain capacity, commodity price futures, or to provide customers with data-driven offers. Enterprises are pouring money and energy into creating innovative applications and getting them to market faster, better and cheaper. Agile and DevOps capabilities can reduce release cycles from months to mere days, and the funding for these investments typically comes by spending reductions in infrastructure.

These complexities can quickly overwhelm human abilities and makes the job of resolving problems and maintaining systems increasingly difficult and time-consuming. That impacts service quality. Forrester has conducted a number of surveys and found that 56 percent of IT organizations resolve less than 75 percent of application performance problems in 24 hours, and in some cases, those performance issues can lag for months before resolution. Consider as examples outages that affect services like Gmail or Dropbox.

The root of the problem lies with the fact that IT grew up around domains such as the network, systems, applications, databases, etc., and they needed domain data to do their jobs. That has driven a proliferation of domain-centric point tools, which helps each domain group, but also means that for even very simple transactions, domain teams only see part of the transaction, such as packet data or metrics from an app server. This incomplete visibility means domain teams see different things due to inconsistent data sets and differing analytic approaches. That leads to a lack of collaboration, warring tribes, and ultimately conflicting conclusions that inhibit fast time to resolution.

For example, last year Adobe’s move to cloud-based software back fired momentarily when database maintenance resulted in application availability issues. The company’s Creative Cloud service was unavailable for about a day, leaving users unable to access the web versions of apps such as Photoshop and Premiere. In total, the outage was said to have impacted at least a million subscribers. Other Adobe-related products were impacted during the downtime as well, including Adobe's Business Catalyst analytics tool. The company has since implemented procedures to prevent a similar outage from happening again.

This instance highlights the area where companies typically struggle to solve performance issues. Once a problem occurs, it usually doesn’t take long for a frustrated employee or customer to raise it with IT, and once the specific cause is identified, fixing and validating that fix should not take long. Where the delays occur is in the middle of that timeline: the diagnosis, or what Forrester refers to as the “Mean Time to Know” (MTTK).

Because an IT organization is typically divided into independent silos that have little interaction with each other, the diagnosis process cannot be a collaborative effort. The war room where personnel gather to battle the problem becomes a war against each other. Instead of one collaborative effort, each silo uses its own specialized tools to evaluate the issue, and can typically only determine the fault lies with another group, but does not know which one. So the problem gets passed from group to group, a tedious and time-wasting exercise.

We will always have different, specialized groups within one IT organization to oversee services and applications such as end-user experiences, application monitoring, database monitoring, transaction mapping and infrastructure monitoring. What must change is the elimination of the individual dashboards each group uses to monitor its own domains. The key is to roll all of that reporting information in real-time into one global dashboard that provides broad domain monitoring capabilities that can be abstracted and analyzed in a way that focuses on services and transactions. Providing this single source of truth will reconcile technology silos and support better incident and problem management processes.

In other words, you take the war out of the war room. Each participant can find the right information needed to perform his or her tasks while also sharing that information with their peers so they can do the same.

Implementing this new approach to performance management will be a radical change for many organizations, and there may be initial resistance to overcome as groups worry their individual roles are at risk of marginalization. Again, the ultimate goal is not to eliminate specialized groups within one IT organization, it is to improve the collaboration among those groups. The result is performance management that is much less reactive and must wait for a problem to occur before taking action. Universal real-time monitoring can enable IT to anticipate when and where a problem may arise and fix it before the end user or customer even notices it. The most productive end user and happiest customer can often be the ones you never hear from because their experiences are always positive. That kind of silence is golden.

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.