Skip to main content

The Case for Putting AI and ML to Work in the IT Department

Phil Tee

With 2017 behind us, the news cycle is still stirring up stories on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), but has some of the excitement worn off? We're witnessing a surge of activity in the space, with unexpected names like Ferrari throwing their hat into the ring, or some notable failures like a smart suitcase fleeing it's handler. Can actual examples of AI in the enterprise rise among some of the noise that's inundating the market and hindering the credibility of everyone?

What Comes Up, Must Come Down

This has happened before. Emergent technology faces a gauntlet, and Gartner's famous Hype Cycle model can help illustrate this point.

First, technology makes waves with a “trigger” that garners media attention or investor buy-in. This usually creates an overly-optimistic projection of what's possible, which aligns with Gartner's “peak of inflated expectations.”

At the top of that hill is where people start to question whether the technology that was introduced is truly capable of delivering what it claims. This is where harsh criticism hits from multiple angles, and the negativity can be so strong that some companies or technologies actually fail at this point.

Yet, if the technology weathers the storm, there is now a time for level-setting and a more realistic understanding of the market. We're seeing that artificial intelligence and machine learning are two technologies at various points in the hype cycle, but both will follow a similar path.

What's unique here, however, is that, due to the nature of AI and ML, there is a second failure option. With this type of technology, results are rapid and it is generally not possible to determine why a specific result was generated. Another frustration is that the speed of execution usually creates the inability to troubleshoot failures in detail. When put into a real-world environment outside of general deployment and testing, potential problems that might not have been obvious in the lab start to appear.

We can point to some failures — like a smart fridge misreading expiration dates or smart thermostats mistaking temperature readings — but these are minor compared to what else can happen. We've seen this in racist algorithms or facial-recognition incorrectly misidentifying someone at the scene of a riot.

But There is Proof it Can Work, Just Check Out the IT Department

So, is AI and ML worth the hassle? Has it hit rock bottom on the hype cycle without anyway to pick itself back up?

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations

Despite the obstacles, AI is proving itself each day and is key for a better future. Experts in the field are taking note of what works, and we've found that, to be successful, AI systems need data. Both quantity and quality matter, as they need to be trained with the information to make accurate assessments. A challenge today is not that data isn't available, but at times it's difficult to access, analyze and organize … yet the IT department has found itself an ideal center of operation by using the technology for “AIOPs.”

IT infrastructure generates data by the second, and while formats are diverse, data is already machine readable. Thankfully, it turns out that computers are already translating information from one representation to another.

Once this data is applied to an AI or ML system, it can apply various algorithms to try to make sense of them. This means it's seeking what information is significant or what is interconnected in the vast resources — something that an IT team currently does manually at the cost of countless man hours. AI and ML systems can take these huge swaths of data and order them in near real-time, focusing IT teams on what is truly mission critical. Not only does this free up valuable man hours of the IT team, but it elevates them to expand their daily work into new activities that can enhance the overall agility of the enterprise, rather than acting as a constant ticket desk.

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations, by presenting human specialists with actionable events, helping them collaborate more effectively, and learning and improving over time.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The Case for Putting AI and ML to Work in the IT Department

Phil Tee

With 2017 behind us, the news cycle is still stirring up stories on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), but has some of the excitement worn off? We're witnessing a surge of activity in the space, with unexpected names like Ferrari throwing their hat into the ring, or some notable failures like a smart suitcase fleeing it's handler. Can actual examples of AI in the enterprise rise among some of the noise that's inundating the market and hindering the credibility of everyone?

What Comes Up, Must Come Down

This has happened before. Emergent technology faces a gauntlet, and Gartner's famous Hype Cycle model can help illustrate this point.

First, technology makes waves with a “trigger” that garners media attention or investor buy-in. This usually creates an overly-optimistic projection of what's possible, which aligns with Gartner's “peak of inflated expectations.”

At the top of that hill is where people start to question whether the technology that was introduced is truly capable of delivering what it claims. This is where harsh criticism hits from multiple angles, and the negativity can be so strong that some companies or technologies actually fail at this point.

Yet, if the technology weathers the storm, there is now a time for level-setting and a more realistic understanding of the market. We're seeing that artificial intelligence and machine learning are two technologies at various points in the hype cycle, but both will follow a similar path.

What's unique here, however, is that, due to the nature of AI and ML, there is a second failure option. With this type of technology, results are rapid and it is generally not possible to determine why a specific result was generated. Another frustration is that the speed of execution usually creates the inability to troubleshoot failures in detail. When put into a real-world environment outside of general deployment and testing, potential problems that might not have been obvious in the lab start to appear.

We can point to some failures — like a smart fridge misreading expiration dates or smart thermostats mistaking temperature readings — but these are minor compared to what else can happen. We've seen this in racist algorithms or facial-recognition incorrectly misidentifying someone at the scene of a riot.

But There is Proof it Can Work, Just Check Out the IT Department

So, is AI and ML worth the hassle? Has it hit rock bottom on the hype cycle without anyway to pick itself back up?

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations

Despite the obstacles, AI is proving itself each day and is key for a better future. Experts in the field are taking note of what works, and we've found that, to be successful, AI systems need data. Both quantity and quality matter, as they need to be trained with the information to make accurate assessments. A challenge today is not that data isn't available, but at times it's difficult to access, analyze and organize … yet the IT department has found itself an ideal center of operation by using the technology for “AIOPs.”

IT infrastructure generates data by the second, and while formats are diverse, data is already machine readable. Thankfully, it turns out that computers are already translating information from one representation to another.

Once this data is applied to an AI or ML system, it can apply various algorithms to try to make sense of them. This means it's seeking what information is significant or what is interconnected in the vast resources — something that an IT team currently does manually at the cost of countless man hours. AI and ML systems can take these huge swaths of data and order them in near real-time, focusing IT teams on what is truly mission critical. Not only does this free up valuable man hours of the IT team, but it elevates them to expand their daily work into new activities that can enhance the overall agility of the enterprise, rather than acting as a constant ticket desk.

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations, by presenting human specialists with actionable events, helping them collaborate more effectively, and learning and improving over time.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...