Skip to main content

The Case for Putting AI and ML to Work in the IT Department

Phil Tee

With 2017 behind us, the news cycle is still stirring up stories on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), but has some of the excitement worn off? We're witnessing a surge of activity in the space, with unexpected names like Ferrari throwing their hat into the ring, or some notable failures like a smart suitcase fleeing it's handler. Can actual examples of AI in the enterprise rise among some of the noise that's inundating the market and hindering the credibility of everyone?

What Comes Up, Must Come Down

This has happened before. Emergent technology faces a gauntlet, and Gartner's famous Hype Cycle model can help illustrate this point.

First, technology makes waves with a “trigger” that garners media attention or investor buy-in. This usually creates an overly-optimistic projection of what's possible, which aligns with Gartner's “peak of inflated expectations.”

At the top of that hill is where people start to question whether the technology that was introduced is truly capable of delivering what it claims. This is where harsh criticism hits from multiple angles, and the negativity can be so strong that some companies or technologies actually fail at this point.

Yet, if the technology weathers the storm, there is now a time for level-setting and a more realistic understanding of the market. We're seeing that artificial intelligence and machine learning are two technologies at various points in the hype cycle, but both will follow a similar path.

What's unique here, however, is that, due to the nature of AI and ML, there is a second failure option. With this type of technology, results are rapid and it is generally not possible to determine why a specific result was generated. Another frustration is that the speed of execution usually creates the inability to troubleshoot failures in detail. When put into a real-world environment outside of general deployment and testing, potential problems that might not have been obvious in the lab start to appear.

We can point to some failures — like a smart fridge misreading expiration dates or smart thermostats mistaking temperature readings — but these are minor compared to what else can happen. We've seen this in racist algorithms or facial-recognition incorrectly misidentifying someone at the scene of a riot.

But There is Proof it Can Work, Just Check Out the IT Department

So, is AI and ML worth the hassle? Has it hit rock bottom on the hype cycle without anyway to pick itself back up?

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations

Despite the obstacles, AI is proving itself each day and is key for a better future. Experts in the field are taking note of what works, and we've found that, to be successful, AI systems need data. Both quantity and quality matter, as they need to be trained with the information to make accurate assessments. A challenge today is not that data isn't available, but at times it's difficult to access, analyze and organize … yet the IT department has found itself an ideal center of operation by using the technology for “AIOPs.”

IT infrastructure generates data by the second, and while formats are diverse, data is already machine readable. Thankfully, it turns out that computers are already translating information from one representation to another.

Once this data is applied to an AI or ML system, it can apply various algorithms to try to make sense of them. This means it's seeking what information is significant or what is interconnected in the vast resources — something that an IT team currently does manually at the cost of countless man hours. AI and ML systems can take these huge swaths of data and order them in near real-time, focusing IT teams on what is truly mission critical. Not only does this free up valuable man hours of the IT team, but it elevates them to expand their daily work into new activities that can enhance the overall agility of the enterprise, rather than acting as a constant ticket desk.

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations, by presenting human specialists with actionable events, helping them collaborate more effectively, and learning and improving over time.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

We just surveyed 300 frontend and mobile engineers across 16 countries, and the finding that keeps sticking with me isn't the one about AI. It's this: 74% of engineering teams rate themselves in the "middle" of the observability maturity scale. Not reactive, not strategic. Stuck in the middle. They have dashboards, they have tracing, they have alerts. And yet when something goes wrong, they still can't tell you why ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 25, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses  AI's impact on the Wide Area Network (WAN) ... 

Application performance monitoring (APM) dashboards are only as useful as what they are configured to measure. The default setup covers obvious failure modes such as downtime, error spikes, and latency breaches, but it does not cover everything. Some failures produce no alerts or anomalies. The dashboard stays green while users experience a broken product. Here are six signs that is happening ...

The race to deploy AI is largely over. Most enterprises have entered it. The question now is not whether artificial intelligence is running inside the organization. The question is whether anyone is genuinely responsible for what it does. That is not a technical question. It is a leadership one. And most organizations are not yet structured to answer it honestly ...

A new analysis of 250 real-world queries across common retail tasks, such as product pricing, availability, ratings, shipping and specifications, reveals systemic inefficiency at the heart of web-based AI agents. On average, 97.9% of the data retrieved by agents from live web pages is irrelevant to the query being answered. Specifically, the average page ingested ran nearly 9,000 characters, while the average answer was just 32 characters, resulting in a noise-to-signal ratio of 278:1. Price queries were the most extreme outlier, with noise rates approaching 99.5%. That's not a rounding error. That's a structural problem ...

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...

The Case for Putting AI and ML to Work in the IT Department

Phil Tee

With 2017 behind us, the news cycle is still stirring up stories on artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), but has some of the excitement worn off? We're witnessing a surge of activity in the space, with unexpected names like Ferrari throwing their hat into the ring, or some notable failures like a smart suitcase fleeing it's handler. Can actual examples of AI in the enterprise rise among some of the noise that's inundating the market and hindering the credibility of everyone?

What Comes Up, Must Come Down

This has happened before. Emergent technology faces a gauntlet, and Gartner's famous Hype Cycle model can help illustrate this point.

First, technology makes waves with a “trigger” that garners media attention or investor buy-in. This usually creates an overly-optimistic projection of what's possible, which aligns with Gartner's “peak of inflated expectations.”

At the top of that hill is where people start to question whether the technology that was introduced is truly capable of delivering what it claims. This is where harsh criticism hits from multiple angles, and the negativity can be so strong that some companies or technologies actually fail at this point.

Yet, if the technology weathers the storm, there is now a time for level-setting and a more realistic understanding of the market. We're seeing that artificial intelligence and machine learning are two technologies at various points in the hype cycle, but both will follow a similar path.

What's unique here, however, is that, due to the nature of AI and ML, there is a second failure option. With this type of technology, results are rapid and it is generally not possible to determine why a specific result was generated. Another frustration is that the speed of execution usually creates the inability to troubleshoot failures in detail. When put into a real-world environment outside of general deployment and testing, potential problems that might not have been obvious in the lab start to appear.

We can point to some failures — like a smart fridge misreading expiration dates or smart thermostats mistaking temperature readings — but these are minor compared to what else can happen. We've seen this in racist algorithms or facial-recognition incorrectly misidentifying someone at the scene of a riot.

But There is Proof it Can Work, Just Check Out the IT Department

So, is AI and ML worth the hassle? Has it hit rock bottom on the hype cycle without anyway to pick itself back up?

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations

Despite the obstacles, AI is proving itself each day and is key for a better future. Experts in the field are taking note of what works, and we've found that, to be successful, AI systems need data. Both quantity and quality matter, as they need to be trained with the information to make accurate assessments. A challenge today is not that data isn't available, but at times it's difficult to access, analyze and organize … yet the IT department has found itself an ideal center of operation by using the technology for “AIOPs.”

IT infrastructure generates data by the second, and while formats are diverse, data is already machine readable. Thankfully, it turns out that computers are already translating information from one representation to another.

Once this data is applied to an AI or ML system, it can apply various algorithms to try to make sense of them. This means it's seeking what information is significant or what is interconnected in the vast resources — something that an IT team currently does manually at the cost of countless man hours. AI and ML systems can take these huge swaths of data and order them in near real-time, focusing IT teams on what is truly mission critical. Not only does this free up valuable man hours of the IT team, but it elevates them to expand their daily work into new activities that can enhance the overall agility of the enterprise, rather than acting as a constant ticket desk.

AIOps has a huge potential to transform IT and help streamline enterprise operations, by presenting human specialists with actionable events, helping them collaborate more effectively, and learning and improving over time.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

We just surveyed 300 frontend and mobile engineers across 16 countries, and the finding that keeps sticking with me isn't the one about AI. It's this: 74% of engineering teams rate themselves in the "middle" of the observability maturity scale. Not reactive, not strategic. Stuck in the middle. They have dashboards, they have tracing, they have alerts. And yet when something goes wrong, they still can't tell you why ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 25, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses  AI's impact on the Wide Area Network (WAN) ... 

Application performance monitoring (APM) dashboards are only as useful as what they are configured to measure. The default setup covers obvious failure modes such as downtime, error spikes, and latency breaches, but it does not cover everything. Some failures produce no alerts or anomalies. The dashboard stays green while users experience a broken product. Here are six signs that is happening ...

The race to deploy AI is largely over. Most enterprises have entered it. The question now is not whether artificial intelligence is running inside the organization. The question is whether anyone is genuinely responsible for what it does. That is not a technical question. It is a leadership one. And most organizations are not yet structured to answer it honestly ...

A new analysis of 250 real-world queries across common retail tasks, such as product pricing, availability, ratings, shipping and specifications, reveals systemic inefficiency at the heart of web-based AI agents. On average, 97.9% of the data retrieved by agents from live web pages is irrelevant to the query being answered. Specifically, the average page ingested ran nearly 9,000 characters, while the average answer was just 32 characters, resulting in a noise-to-signal ratio of 278:1. Price queries were the most extreme outlier, with noise rates approaching 99.5%. That's not a rounding error. That's a structural problem ...

The enterprises that will define the next decade are not the ones that deployed the most technology. They are the ones who understood what their technology was actually doing. That distinction is not a philosophical point. It is the central operational challenge facing every organization that has spent the last five years modernizing at speed ...

AI is becoming the operating system of the enterprise. It acts as an invisible coordination layer that understands intent, connects systems, and executes work across complex SaaS environments. Previously, employees had to click through multiple systems — CRM, ERP, support tools, collaboration platforms — to complete a single task. Now, instead of navigating each application manually, they can simply state what they need to accomplish ...