Skip to main content

The Role of Automation in Network Operations Isn't What You Think

Song Pang
NetBrain Technologies

Nearly all CIOs have seen IT automation projects get derailed, often because they try to do too much. But the IT skills gaps, layoffs or flat budgets and the increasing complexity of networks, automation is often the only way to scale up network management processes. Changes in technology have made network automation much more accessible to the point that there are low-code and no-code options available.

Any repetitive network management tasks can, and arguably should, be automated. Here are four examples of tasks that can be automated successfully with today's technology.

Task 1: Making network documentation more accurate and comprehensive

Network documentation is essential for a variety of reasons, but large enterprise networks change so quickly that documentation goes out of date almost as soon as it's completed. And more troubling, documentation that simply identifies device connectivity is simply not enough in an era of multi-vendor and multi-cloud digital infrastructures.

Documentation must have the ability to guide network engineers more intelligently as they solve service problems, which requires a clear understanding of all the device operating conditions (physical and virtual), the connection topology of devices, how traffic flows bi-directionally and the desired behaviors that results. And this all must be available at the touch of a button. Network automation is the perfect platform to enable this, since it can work in the background constantly maintaining this multi-facet model of any network in near real-time.

Task 2: Proactively looking for anomalous conditions such as outdated configurations or insecure passwords

Every network has a set of architectures that have been defined to support the business and its mission critical applications. By using no-code approaches to allow any engineer to translate the parameters of these architectures into validation logic, automation can be leveraged to execute verifications at scale.

By doing so, most network problems can be detected and corrected before they materially affect production services. These problem types range from available capacity and service delivery performance to security management and resilience. Device passwords must always be verified to be secure; failover links must be tested to assure they are available during times of stress; and device configurations must be tested to make sure required operating parameters are in effect. These and a hundred other scenarios can be crafted through automation to establish and maintain confidence in the operating baseline.

Task 3: The workflows associated with network troubleshooting

In every enterprise and MSP, there is a constant stream of operational service tasks, or tickets, that must be handled. The resolution of each of these tickets typically requires a set of repetitive steps that must be executed each time manually. And to make matters worse, the same service task being handled by different network engineers may be using completely different sets of steps based on their level of expertise and experience. The result is vastly inconsistent remedies.

Automation can capture the best practices for the majority of problem types and then make those available to engineers across the planet. And since those steps are repetitive, what may have taken hours to execute by hand may take minutes to execute by machine. Network engineers can leverage automation to run this golden set of diagnostics quickly, allowing them to focus on the harder networking issues which may be infrequent or deeply complex. This use of automation for troubleshooting results in lower MTTR, fewer tickets, faster MTTI, and improved resource management.

Task 4: Creating a more secure Change Management environment

Change is one of the most critical aspects of keeping every digital infrastructure up and running and in direct support of the business. And while there have been countless change management solutions over the years from more than a hundred vendors, they all lack the ability to understand the service delivery aspects of change, and they lack the ability to automatically verify that the change was not only completed successfully, but the results were as expected. Simply put, traditional change management solutions may successfully enable device changes to be made, but without an automated way to verify business service impacts, the business itself may suffer unforeseen dependencies.

A strong understanding of the network using a comprehensive digital twin coupled with an automation engine that can provide the means to verify the business services that traverse each and every device, both before and after change is made, is an entirely new way of thinking about change management- in the context of business service delivery, rather than device health.

Ensuring critical applications and IT services perform well is key to the operation and success of any business. No-code network automation enables fundamental change to long-established yet manual workflows, and in doing so, provides a level of consistency and operational performance never previously imagined. Network automation eliminates the tedium found in current processes and reduces the reliance on labor intensive tasks which are repetitive in nature. Network engineers can now rely on automation to handle the first two-thirds of the remedial work that they would otherwise manually do, allowing them to focus on more strategic and forward-looking work.

In broad strokes, automating NetOps enables outage prevention (which preserves the company's livelihood), troubleshooting scale (which saves time and money), application services to be delivered as needed (which increases revenue), network security to be continuously verified (which protects the business), and protected change (which eliminates the unintended consequences typically associated with change). Network automation can elevate network operations from tactical to strategic and bring simplicity and efficiency to NetOps teams.

Song Pang is CTO at NetBrain Technologies

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

The Role of Automation in Network Operations Isn't What You Think

Song Pang
NetBrain Technologies

Nearly all CIOs have seen IT automation projects get derailed, often because they try to do too much. But the IT skills gaps, layoffs or flat budgets and the increasing complexity of networks, automation is often the only way to scale up network management processes. Changes in technology have made network automation much more accessible to the point that there are low-code and no-code options available.

Any repetitive network management tasks can, and arguably should, be automated. Here are four examples of tasks that can be automated successfully with today's technology.

Task 1: Making network documentation more accurate and comprehensive

Network documentation is essential for a variety of reasons, but large enterprise networks change so quickly that documentation goes out of date almost as soon as it's completed. And more troubling, documentation that simply identifies device connectivity is simply not enough in an era of multi-vendor and multi-cloud digital infrastructures.

Documentation must have the ability to guide network engineers more intelligently as they solve service problems, which requires a clear understanding of all the device operating conditions (physical and virtual), the connection topology of devices, how traffic flows bi-directionally and the desired behaviors that results. And this all must be available at the touch of a button. Network automation is the perfect platform to enable this, since it can work in the background constantly maintaining this multi-facet model of any network in near real-time.

Task 2: Proactively looking for anomalous conditions such as outdated configurations or insecure passwords

Every network has a set of architectures that have been defined to support the business and its mission critical applications. By using no-code approaches to allow any engineer to translate the parameters of these architectures into validation logic, automation can be leveraged to execute verifications at scale.

By doing so, most network problems can be detected and corrected before they materially affect production services. These problem types range from available capacity and service delivery performance to security management and resilience. Device passwords must always be verified to be secure; failover links must be tested to assure they are available during times of stress; and device configurations must be tested to make sure required operating parameters are in effect. These and a hundred other scenarios can be crafted through automation to establish and maintain confidence in the operating baseline.

Task 3: The workflows associated with network troubleshooting

In every enterprise and MSP, there is a constant stream of operational service tasks, or tickets, that must be handled. The resolution of each of these tickets typically requires a set of repetitive steps that must be executed each time manually. And to make matters worse, the same service task being handled by different network engineers may be using completely different sets of steps based on their level of expertise and experience. The result is vastly inconsistent remedies.

Automation can capture the best practices for the majority of problem types and then make those available to engineers across the planet. And since those steps are repetitive, what may have taken hours to execute by hand may take minutes to execute by machine. Network engineers can leverage automation to run this golden set of diagnostics quickly, allowing them to focus on the harder networking issues which may be infrequent or deeply complex. This use of automation for troubleshooting results in lower MTTR, fewer tickets, faster MTTI, and improved resource management.

Task 4: Creating a more secure Change Management environment

Change is one of the most critical aspects of keeping every digital infrastructure up and running and in direct support of the business. And while there have been countless change management solutions over the years from more than a hundred vendors, they all lack the ability to understand the service delivery aspects of change, and they lack the ability to automatically verify that the change was not only completed successfully, but the results were as expected. Simply put, traditional change management solutions may successfully enable device changes to be made, but without an automated way to verify business service impacts, the business itself may suffer unforeseen dependencies.

A strong understanding of the network using a comprehensive digital twin coupled with an automation engine that can provide the means to verify the business services that traverse each and every device, both before and after change is made, is an entirely new way of thinking about change management- in the context of business service delivery, rather than device health.

Ensuring critical applications and IT services perform well is key to the operation and success of any business. No-code network automation enables fundamental change to long-established yet manual workflows, and in doing so, provides a level of consistency and operational performance never previously imagined. Network automation eliminates the tedium found in current processes and reduces the reliance on labor intensive tasks which are repetitive in nature. Network engineers can now rely on automation to handle the first two-thirds of the remedial work that they would otherwise manually do, allowing them to focus on more strategic and forward-looking work.

In broad strokes, automating NetOps enables outage prevention (which preserves the company's livelihood), troubleshooting scale (which saves time and money), application services to be delivered as needed (which increases revenue), network security to be continuously verified (which protects the business), and protected change (which eliminates the unintended consequences typically associated with change). Network automation can elevate network operations from tactical to strategic and bring simplicity and efficiency to NetOps teams.

Song Pang is CTO at NetBrain Technologies

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Many organizations assumed their infrastructure strategy was settled. It had been implemented, optimized and built into long-term plans. Recent changes in technology and vendor consolidation are forcing a second look. Cloud outages and licensing changes have exposed how much dependency exists on a small number of platforms. As a result, organizations are reevaluating whether those decisions still hold up under current conditions ...

Edge AI is strategically embedded in core IT and infrastructure spending across industries, according to the 2026 Edge AI Survey from ZEDEDA. The research shows that 83% of C-suite and IT executive respondents say edge AI is important to their core business strategy ...

As AI adoption accelerates, operational complexity — not model intelligence — is becoming the primary barrier to reliable AI at scale, according to the State of AI Engineering 2026 from Datadog ... The report highlights a compounding complexity challenge as AI systems scale ... Around 5% of AI model requests fail in production, with nearly 60% of those failures caused by capacity limits ...

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...