Skip to main content

The State of the CIO

Jonah Kowall

Today’s CIOs face a daunting task: They must move their enterprises from a traditional organization, with some degree of optimization and automation, into the digital business age. Digital businesses are software-defined — dependent on or driven by software, and leveraging software-derived data to drive decision-making. In order to move businesses into the digital age, much needs to evolve, including innovation, leadership, organization, and culture within IT.

These changes often are driven by a chief digital officer or a digitally savvy CIO. There is no doubt that CIOs and CEOs have a close relationship, which is bound to become closer as businesses digitize. According to Gartner’s CIO survey data, 41 percent of CIOs are reporting to their CEO. This is a return to one of the highest levels recorded by Gartner CIO surveys, a result of the digital narrative gaining prominence in the boardroom and on the executive committee. Even stronger evidence of opportunity for CIOs is the fact that the survey reveals that CEOs expect them to lead the digital charge during this critical transition period.

Tenure for CIOs is normally short due to high expectations from CEOs and demands from business unit leadership for IT execution. There does seem to be a disconnect between CEO expectation and what the CIO is executing upon. The level of communication and trust between executives must improve. What this indicates is that higher prioritization is required not only for digitizing the business, but for creating business transaction and impact visibility through data collection and analytics.

These business model transformations require a much greater degree of experimentation and agility, and the understanding and meaning of failure must be re-examined. Although human nature makes us fear failure, some degree of failure should be accepted, especially when experimenting with new capabilities that must be learned. Experimentation should take the form of smaller bets, which can be adjusted and changed quickly, without stringent processes inhibiting the experimentation. If these experiments are successful, they may become strategic initiatives.

Metrics are critical to measuring the success of IT. In the Gartner 2015 CIO Agenda, the following indicators are most often used:


The top IT performance metric is cost, which shows the need to constrict IT spend. Normally this takes the form of data center efficiency gains and running as lean and automated as possible. This frees up dollars for innovative experiments, versus day-to-day operational work. The use of better data and advanced analytics will create new cost savings and opportunities. IT operations analytics will play a big part in this, as the ability for people to manage operational efficiency is becoming too difficult with the complexity in environments today.

The number two metric is service levels, which are a constant struggle due to the way service levels have been measured. In Accenture’s Business Technology Trends Report 2015, experience matters most: 89 percent of business leaders surveyed by Accenture believe that customer experience will be their primary basis for competition by 2016. In my regular discussions with CIOs, ensuring service levels is an issue. Before undergoing any kind of change or improvement, the quality of IT services must be measured properly. Most CIOs have been trying to understand why IT isn’t the first to know when there is a system degradation or outage. This can be most often attributed to two things, one being a focus on infrastructure instead of applications, and the second being a limited view of the end-user experience. End-user focus is key in order to measure business differentiators. Users do not exercise infrastructure specifically; instead, they conduct transactions which traverse infrastructure components. The transaction should be the unit of measure of business, and employees should be bonused and tied to those measures. These issues most often lead towards APM discussions to help solve both of these service level gaps.

I hope this post was helpful and thought-provoking. Future blog topics for the CIO include driving business decisions off data, changing sourcing strategies, innovation and bimodal IT, mobile-first, and a focus on some high growth geographies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The State of the CIO

Jonah Kowall

Today’s CIOs face a daunting task: They must move their enterprises from a traditional organization, with some degree of optimization and automation, into the digital business age. Digital businesses are software-defined — dependent on or driven by software, and leveraging software-derived data to drive decision-making. In order to move businesses into the digital age, much needs to evolve, including innovation, leadership, organization, and culture within IT.

These changes often are driven by a chief digital officer or a digitally savvy CIO. There is no doubt that CIOs and CEOs have a close relationship, which is bound to become closer as businesses digitize. According to Gartner’s CIO survey data, 41 percent of CIOs are reporting to their CEO. This is a return to one of the highest levels recorded by Gartner CIO surveys, a result of the digital narrative gaining prominence in the boardroom and on the executive committee. Even stronger evidence of opportunity for CIOs is the fact that the survey reveals that CEOs expect them to lead the digital charge during this critical transition period.

Tenure for CIOs is normally short due to high expectations from CEOs and demands from business unit leadership for IT execution. There does seem to be a disconnect between CEO expectation and what the CIO is executing upon. The level of communication and trust between executives must improve. What this indicates is that higher prioritization is required not only for digitizing the business, but for creating business transaction and impact visibility through data collection and analytics.

These business model transformations require a much greater degree of experimentation and agility, and the understanding and meaning of failure must be re-examined. Although human nature makes us fear failure, some degree of failure should be accepted, especially when experimenting with new capabilities that must be learned. Experimentation should take the form of smaller bets, which can be adjusted and changed quickly, without stringent processes inhibiting the experimentation. If these experiments are successful, they may become strategic initiatives.

Metrics are critical to measuring the success of IT. In the Gartner 2015 CIO Agenda, the following indicators are most often used:


The top IT performance metric is cost, which shows the need to constrict IT spend. Normally this takes the form of data center efficiency gains and running as lean and automated as possible. This frees up dollars for innovative experiments, versus day-to-day operational work. The use of better data and advanced analytics will create new cost savings and opportunities. IT operations analytics will play a big part in this, as the ability for people to manage operational efficiency is becoming too difficult with the complexity in environments today.

The number two metric is service levels, which are a constant struggle due to the way service levels have been measured. In Accenture’s Business Technology Trends Report 2015, experience matters most: 89 percent of business leaders surveyed by Accenture believe that customer experience will be their primary basis for competition by 2016. In my regular discussions with CIOs, ensuring service levels is an issue. Before undergoing any kind of change or improvement, the quality of IT services must be measured properly. Most CIOs have been trying to understand why IT isn’t the first to know when there is a system degradation or outage. This can be most often attributed to two things, one being a focus on infrastructure instead of applications, and the second being a limited view of the end-user experience. End-user focus is key in order to measure business differentiators. Users do not exercise infrastructure specifically; instead, they conduct transactions which traverse infrastructure components. The transaction should be the unit of measure of business, and employees should be bonused and tied to those measures. These issues most often lead towards APM discussions to help solve both of these service level gaps.

I hope this post was helpful and thought-provoking. Future blog topics for the CIO include driving business decisions off data, changing sourcing strategies, innovation and bimodal IT, mobile-first, and a focus on some high growth geographies.

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...