Skip to main content

Understanding Observability Data's Impact Across an Organization

Tucker Callaway
Mezmo

As demand for digital services increases and distributed systems become more complex, organizations must collect and process a growing amount of observability data (logs, metrics, and traces). Site reliability engineers (SREs), developers, and security engineers use observability data to learn how their applications and environments are performing so they can successfully respond to issues and mitigate risk.

With use cases expanding across many business units, it's important for organizations to know how users in various roles use observability data. A new report from The Harris Poll and Mezmo explores this concept. Based on a survey of 300 SREs, developers, and security engineers in the US, the study digs into key pain points and how companies might use observability pipelines to help make decisions faster.

Observability Data Is a Part of Daily Usage

More than half of SREs, developers, and security engineers use observability data daily, with another third of people in each role using it two to three times per week. Typical machine data interaction looks different for each role. SREs focus on troubleshooting, analytics, and monitoring uptime; developers on troubleshooting and debugging; and security engineers on cybersecurity, firewall integrity, and threat detection.

The Amount of Data Is Escalating

Data volume is increasing considerably and becoming difficult to control as data is spread across many systems and apps. While respondents in all three roles use a median of four data sources to get their jobs done, SREs and developers often use three separate products to access that data, and security engineers use two. And over the last 12 months, developers and security engineers have seen a median of two new data sources being added, and SREs have seen three.

Adding new data sources and controlling the flow of data has become an overly complex process involving many different tools that don't integrate well and provide delayed insights. Organizations must harness all this data to make real-time business decisions because a slight delay can cause issues.

Difficult to Control Skyrocketing Costs

In addition to data volume, the three groups listed cost control as a top challenge. Specifically, 92% of SREs, 99% of developers, and 97% of security engineers say it's hard to manage the costs of collecting and storing data. High volume of data creates budget pressures across the organization as budgets are not increasing proportionally to the cost. Organizations must look for ways to extract more value from their telemetry data by making data available to wider teams for additional use cases. This requires free flow of usable telemetry data to any platform of choice.

Making Data Actionable with Observability Pipelines

Most professionals in all three roles agree that newly adopted technology, like observability pipelines, must integrate with existing data management platforms. When looking at observability pipelines to help better control and take action on data, all three roles report that supporting cloud data sources is essential. SREs and developers are also interested in making sure that cloud application data sources are supported, while SREs and security engineers need to be sure that there is firewall data source support. However, teams are not just looking for collecting data but need various transformations to add additional context to the data. They are looking for capabilities such as log transformations, sampling, enrichment, and augmentation to make data more meaningful and actionable.

As the report reveals, the importance of observability data is growing, but organizations are challenged with making this data actionable. Observability data pipelines are an emerging technology organizations can use to collect, transform, and route all this data to various teams for greater actionability. Once organizations can understand how different groups use this data, they'll be able to extract greater value for the business.

Tucker Callaway is CEO of Mezmo

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...

Understanding Observability Data's Impact Across an Organization

Tucker Callaway
Mezmo

As demand for digital services increases and distributed systems become more complex, organizations must collect and process a growing amount of observability data (logs, metrics, and traces). Site reliability engineers (SREs), developers, and security engineers use observability data to learn how their applications and environments are performing so they can successfully respond to issues and mitigate risk.

With use cases expanding across many business units, it's important for organizations to know how users in various roles use observability data. A new report from The Harris Poll and Mezmo explores this concept. Based on a survey of 300 SREs, developers, and security engineers in the US, the study digs into key pain points and how companies might use observability pipelines to help make decisions faster.

Observability Data Is a Part of Daily Usage

More than half of SREs, developers, and security engineers use observability data daily, with another third of people in each role using it two to three times per week. Typical machine data interaction looks different for each role. SREs focus on troubleshooting, analytics, and monitoring uptime; developers on troubleshooting and debugging; and security engineers on cybersecurity, firewall integrity, and threat detection.

The Amount of Data Is Escalating

Data volume is increasing considerably and becoming difficult to control as data is spread across many systems and apps. While respondents in all three roles use a median of four data sources to get their jobs done, SREs and developers often use three separate products to access that data, and security engineers use two. And over the last 12 months, developers and security engineers have seen a median of two new data sources being added, and SREs have seen three.

Adding new data sources and controlling the flow of data has become an overly complex process involving many different tools that don't integrate well and provide delayed insights. Organizations must harness all this data to make real-time business decisions because a slight delay can cause issues.

Difficult to Control Skyrocketing Costs

In addition to data volume, the three groups listed cost control as a top challenge. Specifically, 92% of SREs, 99% of developers, and 97% of security engineers say it's hard to manage the costs of collecting and storing data. High volume of data creates budget pressures across the organization as budgets are not increasing proportionally to the cost. Organizations must look for ways to extract more value from their telemetry data by making data available to wider teams for additional use cases. This requires free flow of usable telemetry data to any platform of choice.

Making Data Actionable with Observability Pipelines

Most professionals in all three roles agree that newly adopted technology, like observability pipelines, must integrate with existing data management platforms. When looking at observability pipelines to help better control and take action on data, all three roles report that supporting cloud data sources is essential. SREs and developers are also interested in making sure that cloud application data sources are supported, while SREs and security engineers need to be sure that there is firewall data source support. However, teams are not just looking for collecting data but need various transformations to add additional context to the data. They are looking for capabilities such as log transformations, sampling, enrichment, and augmentation to make data more meaningful and actionable.

As the report reveals, the importance of observability data is growing, but organizations are challenged with making this data actionable. Observability data pipelines are an emerging technology organizations can use to collect, transform, and route all this data to various teams for greater actionability. Once organizations can understand how different groups use this data, they'll be able to extract greater value for the business.

Tucker Callaway is CEO of Mezmo

Hot Topics

The Latest

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

The gap is widening between what teams spend on observability tools and the value they receive amid surging data volumes and budget pressures, according to The Breaking Point for Observability Leaders, a report from Imply ...