Skip to main content

Unified Observability Technology Is a Strategic Imperative

Overburdened by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, IT teams increasingly rely on Unified Observability technology
Mike Marks
Riverbed

IT teams feel overwhelmed by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, according to The Shift to Unified Observability: Reasons, Requirements, and Returns, a new independent survey conducted by IDC in collaboration with Riverbed. Many are increasingly relying on Unified Observability technology to drive more effective IT troubleshooting while ensuring reliability and availability for both internal users and external ones such as prospects, customers, and partners.


70% of survey respondents believe Unified Observability is critical to delivering the best digital experiences for customers and employees. Almost all respondents, 90%, said they use observability tools. However, 60% said those tools are too narrowly focused and fail to provide a complete and unified view of the enterprise's current operating conditions, creating an incredible challenge for understaffed IT teams trying to manage network operations and meet increasingly high customer expectations.

The majority of IT professionals surveyed have a decided preference for true Unified Observability technologies that cut across silos and departments, delivering actionable results. The intelligence and insights delivered through Unified Observability allow lower-level IT staff to take fast and decisive action, letting senior IT teams focus on strategic business initiatives that drive the enterprise.

IT leaders said that the number one driver for Unified Observability is improved teamwork and productivity. In the current IT staffing crisis, IT productivity is a critical issue as 56% said their organizations struggle to hire and retain IT staff. Senior leaders often spend time manually troubleshooting problems, which has led 58% respondents to think their experts spend too much time on technical responsibilities.

They are facing that burden with an unmanageable mix of tools as 54% of organizations use six or more discreet tools for IT monitoring and measurement. For 61% of the respondents, the tool limitations hold back productivity and collaboration. With these restrictions, it's little wonder that 75% of organizations say they have trouble driving actionable insights using their current array of tools.

Unified Observability solutions that produce actionable insights through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning reduce the tactical burden understaffed IT teams face. The improved teamwork and collaboration provided by Unified Observability enables low level staffers to find and fix issues, limiting the need for resource intensive war rooms and giving senior leadership the time they need to focus on key strategic initiatives.

Recognizing the problem with their current set of observability tools, IT leaders are starting to make investments in Unified Observability. Half of the respondents say their budgets will increase in the next two years, and 30% say their budget will increase more than 25%.

One of the authors of the survey, Mark Leary, IDC Research Director, Network Analytics and Automation, believes that digital infrastructures have outstripped the ability for IT organizations to keep pace with both business and technology requirements. The inability for organizations to collect the data that they need for complete visibility results in infrastructure blind spots that lead to incomplete and often inaccurate analysis. Realizing these shortcomings and the impact they have on IT productivity, enterprises have made Unified Observability a strategic imperative, and the responsibility of C-level IT leaders.

Methodology: In July 2022, IDC surveyed 1,400 IT professionals from across 10 countries. Survey respondents came from seven industries (financial, manufacturing, healthcare, energy, technology, government, and professional services). Over 75% of respondents represented large enterprises (1000+ employees) and 70% held Director or above positions within their respective IT organizations. All had managerial responsibility for observability and/or IT performance management functions, use, staff, and budgets.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

Hot Topics

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

Unified Observability Technology Is a Strategic Imperative

Overburdened by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, IT teams increasingly rely on Unified Observability technology
Mike Marks
Riverbed

IT teams feel overwhelmed by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, according to The Shift to Unified Observability: Reasons, Requirements, and Returns, a new independent survey conducted by IDC in collaboration with Riverbed. Many are increasingly relying on Unified Observability technology to drive more effective IT troubleshooting while ensuring reliability and availability for both internal users and external ones such as prospects, customers, and partners.


70% of survey respondents believe Unified Observability is critical to delivering the best digital experiences for customers and employees. Almost all respondents, 90%, said they use observability tools. However, 60% said those tools are too narrowly focused and fail to provide a complete and unified view of the enterprise's current operating conditions, creating an incredible challenge for understaffed IT teams trying to manage network operations and meet increasingly high customer expectations.

The majority of IT professionals surveyed have a decided preference for true Unified Observability technologies that cut across silos and departments, delivering actionable results. The intelligence and insights delivered through Unified Observability allow lower-level IT staff to take fast and decisive action, letting senior IT teams focus on strategic business initiatives that drive the enterprise.

IT leaders said that the number one driver for Unified Observability is improved teamwork and productivity. In the current IT staffing crisis, IT productivity is a critical issue as 56% said their organizations struggle to hire and retain IT staff. Senior leaders often spend time manually troubleshooting problems, which has led 58% respondents to think their experts spend too much time on technical responsibilities.

They are facing that burden with an unmanageable mix of tools as 54% of organizations use six or more discreet tools for IT monitoring and measurement. For 61% of the respondents, the tool limitations hold back productivity and collaboration. With these restrictions, it's little wonder that 75% of organizations say they have trouble driving actionable insights using their current array of tools.

Unified Observability solutions that produce actionable insights through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning reduce the tactical burden understaffed IT teams face. The improved teamwork and collaboration provided by Unified Observability enables low level staffers to find and fix issues, limiting the need for resource intensive war rooms and giving senior leadership the time they need to focus on key strategic initiatives.

Recognizing the problem with their current set of observability tools, IT leaders are starting to make investments in Unified Observability. Half of the respondents say their budgets will increase in the next two years, and 30% say their budget will increase more than 25%.

One of the authors of the survey, Mark Leary, IDC Research Director, Network Analytics and Automation, believes that digital infrastructures have outstripped the ability for IT organizations to keep pace with both business and technology requirements. The inability for organizations to collect the data that they need for complete visibility results in infrastructure blind spots that lead to incomplete and often inaccurate analysis. Realizing these shortcomings and the impact they have on IT productivity, enterprises have made Unified Observability a strategic imperative, and the responsibility of C-level IT leaders.

Methodology: In July 2022, IDC surveyed 1,400 IT professionals from across 10 countries. Survey respondents came from seven industries (financial, manufacturing, healthcare, energy, technology, government, and professional services). Over 75% of respondents represented large enterprises (1000+ employees) and 70% held Director or above positions within their respective IT organizations. All had managerial responsibility for observability and/or IT performance management functions, use, staff, and budgets.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

Hot Topics

The Latest

I've spent a lot of time in the channel, and one thing I keep coming back to is this: a partner program is only as good as what it looks like in the field. Many programs look great on paper, but when a partner is in front of a customer navigating a complex hybrid environment or trying to make the case for AI-powered observability, the gap between what a vendor promises and what it actually delivers becomes very clear, very fast ...

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...