Skip to main content

Unified Observability Technology Is a Strategic Imperative

Overburdened by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, IT teams increasingly rely on Unified Observability technology
Mike Marks
Riverbed

IT teams feel overwhelmed by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, according to The Shift to Unified Observability: Reasons, Requirements, and Returns, a new independent survey conducted by IDC in collaboration with Riverbed. Many are increasingly relying on Unified Observability technology to drive more effective IT troubleshooting while ensuring reliability and availability for both internal users and external ones such as prospects, customers, and partners.


70% of survey respondents believe Unified Observability is critical to delivering the best digital experiences for customers and employees. Almost all respondents, 90%, said they use observability tools. However, 60% said those tools are too narrowly focused and fail to provide a complete and unified view of the enterprise's current operating conditions, creating an incredible challenge for understaffed IT teams trying to manage network operations and meet increasingly high customer expectations.

The majority of IT professionals surveyed have a decided preference for true Unified Observability technologies that cut across silos and departments, delivering actionable results. The intelligence and insights delivered through Unified Observability allow lower-level IT staff to take fast and decisive action, letting senior IT teams focus on strategic business initiatives that drive the enterprise.

IT leaders said that the number one driver for Unified Observability is improved teamwork and productivity. In the current IT staffing crisis, IT productivity is a critical issue as 56% said their organizations struggle to hire and retain IT staff. Senior leaders often spend time manually troubleshooting problems, which has led 58% respondents to think their experts spend too much time on technical responsibilities.

They are facing that burden with an unmanageable mix of tools as 54% of organizations use six or more discreet tools for IT monitoring and measurement. For 61% of the respondents, the tool limitations hold back productivity and collaboration. With these restrictions, it's little wonder that 75% of organizations say they have trouble driving actionable insights using their current array of tools.

Unified Observability solutions that produce actionable insights through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning reduce the tactical burden understaffed IT teams face. The improved teamwork and collaboration provided by Unified Observability enables low level staffers to find and fix issues, limiting the need for resource intensive war rooms and giving senior leadership the time they need to focus on key strategic initiatives.

Recognizing the problem with their current set of observability tools, IT leaders are starting to make investments in Unified Observability. Half of the respondents say their budgets will increase in the next two years, and 30% say their budget will increase more than 25%.

One of the authors of the survey, Mark Leary, IDC Research Director, Network Analytics and Automation, believes that digital infrastructures have outstripped the ability for IT organizations to keep pace with both business and technology requirements. The inability for organizations to collect the data that they need for complete visibility results in infrastructure blind spots that lead to incomplete and often inaccurate analysis. Realizing these shortcomings and the impact they have on IT productivity, enterprises have made Unified Observability a strategic imperative, and the responsibility of C-level IT leaders.

Methodology: In July 2022, IDC surveyed 1,400 IT professionals from across 10 countries. Survey respondents came from seven industries (financial, manufacturing, healthcare, energy, technology, government, and professional services). Over 75% of respondents represented large enterprises (1000+ employees) and 70% held Director or above positions within their respective IT organizations. All had managerial responsibility for observability and/or IT performance management functions, use, staff, and budgets.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

Unified Observability Technology Is a Strategic Imperative

Overburdened by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, IT teams increasingly rely on Unified Observability technology
Mike Marks
Riverbed

IT teams feel overwhelmed by too many tools that do not provide a unified view of the entire IT infrastructure, according to The Shift to Unified Observability: Reasons, Requirements, and Returns, a new independent survey conducted by IDC in collaboration with Riverbed. Many are increasingly relying on Unified Observability technology to drive more effective IT troubleshooting while ensuring reliability and availability for both internal users and external ones such as prospects, customers, and partners.


70% of survey respondents believe Unified Observability is critical to delivering the best digital experiences for customers and employees. Almost all respondents, 90%, said they use observability tools. However, 60% said those tools are too narrowly focused and fail to provide a complete and unified view of the enterprise's current operating conditions, creating an incredible challenge for understaffed IT teams trying to manage network operations and meet increasingly high customer expectations.

The majority of IT professionals surveyed have a decided preference for true Unified Observability technologies that cut across silos and departments, delivering actionable results. The intelligence and insights delivered through Unified Observability allow lower-level IT staff to take fast and decisive action, letting senior IT teams focus on strategic business initiatives that drive the enterprise.

IT leaders said that the number one driver for Unified Observability is improved teamwork and productivity. In the current IT staffing crisis, IT productivity is a critical issue as 56% said their organizations struggle to hire and retain IT staff. Senior leaders often spend time manually troubleshooting problems, which has led 58% respondents to think their experts spend too much time on technical responsibilities.

They are facing that burden with an unmanageable mix of tools as 54% of organizations use six or more discreet tools for IT monitoring and measurement. For 61% of the respondents, the tool limitations hold back productivity and collaboration. With these restrictions, it's little wonder that 75% of organizations say they have trouble driving actionable insights using their current array of tools.

Unified Observability solutions that produce actionable insights through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning reduce the tactical burden understaffed IT teams face. The improved teamwork and collaboration provided by Unified Observability enables low level staffers to find and fix issues, limiting the need for resource intensive war rooms and giving senior leadership the time they need to focus on key strategic initiatives.

Recognizing the problem with their current set of observability tools, IT leaders are starting to make investments in Unified Observability. Half of the respondents say their budgets will increase in the next two years, and 30% say their budget will increase more than 25%.

One of the authors of the survey, Mark Leary, IDC Research Director, Network Analytics and Automation, believes that digital infrastructures have outstripped the ability for IT organizations to keep pace with both business and technology requirements. The inability for organizations to collect the data that they need for complete visibility results in infrastructure blind spots that lead to incomplete and often inaccurate analysis. Realizing these shortcomings and the impact they have on IT productivity, enterprises have made Unified Observability a strategic imperative, and the responsibility of C-level IT leaders.

Methodology: In July 2022, IDC surveyed 1,400 IT professionals from across 10 countries. Survey respondents came from seven industries (financial, manufacturing, healthcare, energy, technology, government, and professional services). Over 75% of respondents represented large enterprises (1000+ employees) and 70% held Director or above positions within their respective IT organizations. All had managerial responsibility for observability and/or IT performance management functions, use, staff, and budgets.

Mike Marks is VP of Product Marketing at Riverbed

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.