Skip to main content

Updates, Updates, Updates: How to Fireproof Your Business-Critical Software

Lorna Crawford
Login VSI

As Ferris Bueller once said, "Life moves pretty fast." It is especially true for those of us working in IT.

Microsoft releases two major Windows 10 updates per year, and in addition 12 monthly updates for their operating system. Change is unrelenting and so are the potential dangers that accompany it.

Despite Microsoft being one of the largest, most trusted software vendors in the world, I could very likely find news articles pointing out failures with each new release over the last few years. These bugs can mean the applications you need to do your job don't function properly, or worst, don't work at all.

Of course, Microsoft is only one small part of the overall stack of your hardware and software and each element can require frequent changes that can impact you as an end-user. The fact is changes happen all the time in the overall VDI stack.

What Does Change Mean?


When you consider that the average end-user interacts with at least 8 applications, then think about how important those applications are in the overall success of the business and how often the interface between the application and the hardware needs to be updated, it's a potential minefield for business operations. Any single update could explode in your face at any time.

Given the ever-accelerating pace of IT change, how can businesses cope?

Safe Not Sorry

As lockdown restrictions ease, I'll be off on some campervan adventures around Scotland. I want to be able to cook safely and have off-grid heating (it is Scotland after all), which means using gas. Now, as you'll know, installing gas heating in a small confined space comes with the risk of Carbon Monoxide poisoning, and to be honest, my cooking often comes with the risk of fire! So, as I'm aware of the danger, I'm putting in smoke and CO detectors, plus installing a fire blanket and a fire extinguisher. I value my van and, more importantly, my life.

Likewise, any company managing an ever-changing software stack needs to consider the risks associated with putting blind trust into the hands of software vendors like Microsoft. My advice would be to de-risk frequent IT changes with a robust application testing strategy.

Start with automating the process of testing your applications and see if there are any problems with them after making updates to the hardware and software platforms they reside on. Preferably use a testing solution where synthetic users test all the typical activities that real users need to perform in your application. You then should be able to answer the following questions after each change to your environment:

■ Does the software work?

■ How long does it take to do each business-critical task?

■ Is the application response time within an acceptable range?

But what if you have fancy and custom-built applications? Look for a solution that can help you design custom scripts to test your custom applications.

Lorna Crawford is a Presales Engineer at Login VSI

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

Updates, Updates, Updates: How to Fireproof Your Business-Critical Software

Lorna Crawford
Login VSI

As Ferris Bueller once said, "Life moves pretty fast." It is especially true for those of us working in IT.

Microsoft releases two major Windows 10 updates per year, and in addition 12 monthly updates for their operating system. Change is unrelenting and so are the potential dangers that accompany it.

Despite Microsoft being one of the largest, most trusted software vendors in the world, I could very likely find news articles pointing out failures with each new release over the last few years. These bugs can mean the applications you need to do your job don't function properly, or worst, don't work at all.

Of course, Microsoft is only one small part of the overall stack of your hardware and software and each element can require frequent changes that can impact you as an end-user. The fact is changes happen all the time in the overall VDI stack.

What Does Change Mean?


When you consider that the average end-user interacts with at least 8 applications, then think about how important those applications are in the overall success of the business and how often the interface between the application and the hardware needs to be updated, it's a potential minefield for business operations. Any single update could explode in your face at any time.

Given the ever-accelerating pace of IT change, how can businesses cope?

Safe Not Sorry

As lockdown restrictions ease, I'll be off on some campervan adventures around Scotland. I want to be able to cook safely and have off-grid heating (it is Scotland after all), which means using gas. Now, as you'll know, installing gas heating in a small confined space comes with the risk of Carbon Monoxide poisoning, and to be honest, my cooking often comes with the risk of fire! So, as I'm aware of the danger, I'm putting in smoke and CO detectors, plus installing a fire blanket and a fire extinguisher. I value my van and, more importantly, my life.

Likewise, any company managing an ever-changing software stack needs to consider the risks associated with putting blind trust into the hands of software vendors like Microsoft. My advice would be to de-risk frequent IT changes with a robust application testing strategy.

Start with automating the process of testing your applications and see if there are any problems with them after making updates to the hardware and software platforms they reside on. Preferably use a testing solution where synthetic users test all the typical activities that real users need to perform in your application. You then should be able to answer the following questions after each change to your environment:

■ Does the software work?

■ How long does it take to do each business-critical task?

■ Is the application response time within an acceptable range?

But what if you have fancy and custom-built applications? Look for a solution that can help you design custom scripts to test your custom applications.

Lorna Crawford is a Presales Engineer at Login VSI

Hot Topics

The Latest

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...