Skip to main content

When Applications Don't Play Nicely

Jim Swepson

A friend of mine is a consultant and she doesn't easily have access to the latest technology and as such her trusty laptop is the mainstay of her business. She also uses her machine for personal stuff such as: online banking, online shopping, as well as her business and its applications. A good security system is of course essential.

Recently though she downloaded, at the “soft” insistence of her bank, a specific security application. It was to guarantee extra security whilst using her personal online banking facilities and so she downloaded it without too much thought, trusting that her bank would not allow her to download software that could cause problems.

It wasn't long after this that she noticed her laptop was running much slower, in fact over the space of a few months it became so slow that when finances allowed, she would invest in a new laptop.

When she wanted to place another application onto her laptop, she asked me if we could do this for her. We decided to update her laptop, and it wasn't long before it was noted that the CPU levels were unacceptably high. Even after the download the CPU was still running way higher than it should and her laptop was very very slow. She explained that she was planning on changing soon, as it had been getting too slow.

We decided to take a look and it and it wasn't long before we located the security application – which was interfering with another security application that she already had in place. Now I'm not saying this application doesn't do what it is purported to do, but on her particular laptop and with the security application she was already using it was causing major problems. We asked if we could take it off and she gave us permission to do so, unusually this took a very long time as we couldn't just remove it in the usual manner, we had to go onto the company's site to get download info to do this.

Finally, the security application was removed and within minutes her laptop became not just doubly faster but ten times faster! The CPU was behaving within normal parameters and she was ecstatic that her old laptop was responsive and fast! Happily by removing this security application she no longer needed to purchase a new one saving her hundreds of pounds.

I guess the moral of my story here isn't that all security applications have problems, not even that this particular application is a risky download. It's more about awareness. We often don't know how our applications in-situ can be impacted by new applications placed on our machines. It got me thinking that a knowledge of this would have made my friend re-think downloading this type of application.

When companies add new applications that can impact hundreds or thousands of machines, they should test not just the performance of the new application but also how it impacts applications in-situ.

But for the layman the risks are not considered. My advice to anyone downloading applications whether personal or business is do your homework. For the personal user, do a Google search and find out if there are any risks associated with downloading the application. For businesses, use a network emulator to replicate the conditions of your networked environment, run your application and your new applications and see how they react to each other. It's not rocket science, a simple application that seems safe can unfortunately cause mayhem! Mitigate the risk with awareness and research.

Jim Swepson is a Pre-sales Technologist at Itrinegy.

Related Links:

www.itrinegy.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

When Applications Don't Play Nicely

Jim Swepson

A friend of mine is a consultant and she doesn't easily have access to the latest technology and as such her trusty laptop is the mainstay of her business. She also uses her machine for personal stuff such as: online banking, online shopping, as well as her business and its applications. A good security system is of course essential.

Recently though she downloaded, at the “soft” insistence of her bank, a specific security application. It was to guarantee extra security whilst using her personal online banking facilities and so she downloaded it without too much thought, trusting that her bank would not allow her to download software that could cause problems.

It wasn't long after this that she noticed her laptop was running much slower, in fact over the space of a few months it became so slow that when finances allowed, she would invest in a new laptop.

When she wanted to place another application onto her laptop, she asked me if we could do this for her. We decided to update her laptop, and it wasn't long before it was noted that the CPU levels were unacceptably high. Even after the download the CPU was still running way higher than it should and her laptop was very very slow. She explained that she was planning on changing soon, as it had been getting too slow.

We decided to take a look and it and it wasn't long before we located the security application – which was interfering with another security application that she already had in place. Now I'm not saying this application doesn't do what it is purported to do, but on her particular laptop and with the security application she was already using it was causing major problems. We asked if we could take it off and she gave us permission to do so, unusually this took a very long time as we couldn't just remove it in the usual manner, we had to go onto the company's site to get download info to do this.

Finally, the security application was removed and within minutes her laptop became not just doubly faster but ten times faster! The CPU was behaving within normal parameters and she was ecstatic that her old laptop was responsive and fast! Happily by removing this security application she no longer needed to purchase a new one saving her hundreds of pounds.

I guess the moral of my story here isn't that all security applications have problems, not even that this particular application is a risky download. It's more about awareness. We often don't know how our applications in-situ can be impacted by new applications placed on our machines. It got me thinking that a knowledge of this would have made my friend re-think downloading this type of application.

When companies add new applications that can impact hundreds or thousands of machines, they should test not just the performance of the new application but also how it impacts applications in-situ.

But for the layman the risks are not considered. My advice to anyone downloading applications whether personal or business is do your homework. For the personal user, do a Google search and find out if there are any risks associated with downloading the application. For businesses, use a network emulator to replicate the conditions of your networked environment, run your application and your new applications and see how they react to each other. It's not rocket science, a simple application that seems safe can unfortunately cause mayhem! Mitigate the risk with awareness and research.

Jim Swepson is a Pre-sales Technologist at Itrinegy.

Related Links:

www.itrinegy.com

Hot Topics

The Latest

In live financial environments, capital markets software cannot pause for rebuilds. New capabilities are introduced as stacked technology layers to meet evolving demands while systems remain active, data keeps moving, and controls stay intact. AI is no exception, and its opportunities are significant: accelerated decision cycles, compressed manual workflows, and more effective operations across complex environments. The constraint isn't the models themselves, but the architectural environments they enter ...

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.