While it’s become fashionable to look at CMDBs as unwieldy and generally Quixotiesque endeavors—the truth is that solid technologies for effective CMDB and CMS—(if you believe as I do that the move towards a federated system is the future) – are just now really emerging. When you consider how revolutionary the idea is of reconciling everything from discovery and monitoring tools to asset databases in different formats from different companies into a single cohesive system—then I think you would have to agree that it’s only fair that this should take time.
EMA (i.e. me in this case) just completed a radar analysis of eleven vendors and talked to more than 20 CMDB/CMS deployments in North America and Europe. The research confirmed my views that CMDB-related technologies are evolving to become more dynamic, more real-time, more deployable, more use-case directed, and more varied in design. They are also becoming more essential than ever—spurred in part, ironically – by cloud computing which is pressuring companies to move towards a more cross-domain, and ultimately more service-centric model for management. (As I’ve pointed out in the past, companies with CMDB and application dependency tools show a 1.4 to 1.5 times advantage over those without in making cloud investments more effective.)
For this radar I excluded platform or framework vendors from the eleven vendors I worked with, in part because of the nature of EMA’s radar technology to create “framework ghettos” richer in function and higher in price.(I’ll be doing a platform-centric radar in Q 3-4 and include a few of the vendors here for comparison sake.) But I also wanted to focus on the differences in design to show, or confirm—what I believed to be true – that innovation in CMDB/CMS design is accelerating in multiple different directions.
The eleven vendors are:
- ASG Software
- Axios Systems
- iET Solutions
- Interlink Software
- n(i)2 Network Infrastructure Inventory
- Numara Software
- SunView Software
They were assessed along three use cases: Asset Management and Cost Optimization; Change Management and Change Impact Analysis; and Service Impact Management.
To give you an idea of some of the perspectives, I thought I’d wrap up with a few quotes from vendors and customer deployments—that highlight how CMDB-related technologies are changing, or not- -and how they are working in the real world. One thing, BTW, that hasn’t changed is the fact that just as CMDB/CMS is a revolutionary technology—it has parallel revolutionary implications for organizations, cultures, and processes as a few quotes below indicate.
Vendor: A couple of customer opportunities presented themselves—but the potential buyers said, “When you send in the P.O., make sure it doesn’t have the letters CMDB anywhere.” So we sometimes sell CMDB solutions by avoiding the letters C-M-D-B in our proposal.
Customer: We want to minimize the human interaction to get the CMDB up to date. The more manual the effort, the lower the accuracy of the CMDB.
Customer: In order to manage vMotion we needed a solution that was dynamically current and automatic in modeling infrastructure and application interdependencies.
Customer: We weren’t prepared for the political discussions going into this.
Customer: A large part of what we do is get people to work with changes—people are always resistant to change, we always get resistance.
Customer: Originally there was resistance. But two years later there are no complaints.
Customer: We have about 300 different types of stakeholders defined including business executives, applications management, desktops, servers, mainframes, merger recovery services, facilities planning, and ITIL process owners—just to name a few.
Customer: Our CMDB is doing a good job of supporting our migration towards a more fully virtualized infrastructure. It’s also helping us to cut down on the number of management tools we need.
Customer: We’re using the CMDB as the system of record for all of our PCs and their owners and where they are located and what applications run on them, in addition to our data center assets. It has become our authorized system of record.
These are just a few of many quotes used in the report—as added insight to the vendor assessments. In this unique radar, each Use Case has its own Bubble Chart – so that CMDB designs can be viewed in context with value instead of obscuring their positions by forcing everyone into a single, one-size-fits-all mold. The Webinar will spotlight these differences, while also providing a short-hand RFP for you to use in evaluating CMDB/CMS solutions – platform or not.
Scaling DevOps and SRE practices is critical to accelerating the release of high-quality digital services. However, siloed teams, manual approaches, and increasingly complex tooling slow innovation and make teams more reactive than proactive, impeding their ability to drive value for the business, according to a new report from Dynatrace, Deep Cloud Observability and Advanced AIOps are Key to Scaling DevOps Practices ...
Over three quarters (79%) of database professionals are now using either a paid-for or in-house monitoring tool, according to a new survey from Redgate Software ...
Gartner announced the top strategic technology trends that organizations need to explore in 2022. With CEOs and Boards striving to find growth through direct digital connections with customers, CIOs' priorities must reflect the same business imperatives, which run through each of Gartner's top strategic tech trends for 2022 ...
Distributed tracing has been growing in popularity as a primary tool for investigating performance issues in microservices systems. Our recent DevOps Pulse survey shows a 38% increase year-over-year in organizations' tracing use. Furthermore, 64% of those respondents who are not yet using tracing indicated plans to adopt it in the next two years ...
Businesses are embracing artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to improve network performance and security, according to a new State of AIOps Study, conducted by ZK Research and Masergy ...
What may have appeared to be a stopgap solution in the spring of 2020 is now clearly our new workplace reality: It's impossible to walk back so many of the developments in workflow we've seen since then. The question is no longer when we'll all get back to the office, but how the companies that are lagging in their technological ability to facilitate remote work can catch up ...
The pandemic accelerated organizations' journey to the cloud to enable agile, on-demand, flexible access to resources, helping them align with a digital business's dynamic needs. We heard from many of our customers at the start of lockdown last year, saying they had to shift to a remote work environment, seemingly overnight, and this effort was heavily cloud-reliant. However, blindly forging ahead can backfire ...
SmartBear recently released the results of its 2021 State of Software Quality | Testing survey. I doubt you'll be surprised to hear that a "lack of time" was reported as the number one challenge to doing more testing, especially as release frequencies continue to increase. However, it was disheartening to see that a lack of time was also the number one response when we asked people to identify the biggest blocker to professional development ...
The role of the CIO is evolving with an increased focus on unlocking customer connections through service innovation, according to the 2021 Global CIO Survey. The study reveals the shift in the role of the CIO with the majority of CIO respondents stating innovation, operational efficiency, and customer experience as their top priorities ...
The perception of IT support has dramatically improved thanks to the successful response of service desks to the pandemic, lockdowns and working from home, according to new research from the Service Desk Institute (SDI), sponsored by Sunrise Software ...