WorkPlace Technology Stuck in the Past
June 02, 2016

Pete Goldin

Share this

Employees experience a dramatic gap between the services they seek out in their personal lives vs. those they tolerate at work, according to ServiceNow's new report, Today’s State of Work: The Service Experience Gap.

Despite significant technological advances that allow for delightful customer‑facing experiences from progressive companies, most organizations are not integrating those capabilities into employee‑facing services. That means most people enjoy the tech perks of 2016 at home but head back to 1996 for work.

In analyzing the results of a survey of more than 2,400 managers in 6 countries, ServiceNow developed The Service Experience Index to quantify how delightful services are (or aren’t) at work and beyond. The results validate the frustrations most employees feel when they go to work each day:

1. Consumer services are more than 100% better than workplace services

Popular consumer services ranked 103% better compared to workplace services. While there is still room for improvement, consumer services have the richest customer‑facing experiences when compared to typical workplace services such as opening a purchase order, requesting help from another department, ordering equipment, or tracking down information. Consumer services outpaced those at work in terms of ease of use, notifications, and speed of delivery. Workplace services fell behind in every category. On a scale of 0‑100, consumer services scored an average of 63, while work services scored an average of 31.

“Most companies have a maniacal focus on the experiences of their customers, pulling out all the stops to build both satisfaction and loyalty,” said Dave Wright, Chief Strategy Officer, ServiceNow. “But they aren’t using those same principles for their internal‑facing experiences. They realize that it is very easy for a customer to take their business elsewhere, but that isn’t the case inside the organization. If employees don’t like working with the HR department, they can’t switch to another HR department – they are stuck.”

2. Outdated Workplace Technologies Reduce Productivity

The Service Experience gap is driven by outdated technologies that sap productivity. For example, the survey found:

■ At work, managers are 5 times more likely to use email and 5 times less likely to use a mobile app than for consumer services.

■ Only 28% of managers use the web or a mobile app to request workplace services, versus 84% for consumer services.

■ Only 5% of managers tap mobile apps for workplace services.

■ 69% of managers say that manual workplace services leave them less time for strategic initiatives, lower their productivity or cause them stress.

■ 79% say that monitoring email interferes with completing tasks, as they spend an average of 4 hours a day (3 at work and 1 at home) processing work emails.

“Consumers live in a Web and mobile world where machine logic does the heavy lifting, speeding their requests and sending alerts on status or when people need to act,” said Wright. “At work, firms expect employees to manually push the services forward with email, wasting extra cycles on chasing work status and searching inboxes. Email itself is not the enemy. It’s a symptom of a broken process that waylays corporate productivity.”

3. Companies with mostly manual services lag behind

■ 37% of the companies surveyed said they use mostly manual services with email, phone and meetings to get work done.

■ The Service Experience Index for companies with mostly manual services was only 25, 60% lower than the consumer Service Experience Index.

■ Only 19% said that these manual services are delivered quickly, compared to 65% for consumer services.

■ Only 43% of managers say that these manual services are easy to use, compared to 79% for consumer services.

4. Automation Improves Workplace Services -- Only When Done Right

Automation drove a 50% improvement in the workplace Service Experience Index, but mostly automated workplace services still contain a lot of manual work.

■ Injecting automation in workplace services starts to diminish the consumer services gap.

■ The Service Experience Index for companies with mostly automated workplace services increased to 37, but still 41% lower than that of consumer services.

■ When a service is automated, 40% more managers say it is easy to request, and nearly 60% more say the service is delivered quickly.

■ However, even the most automated of those workplace services still contain a high level of analog process.

■ 89% say that they often or sometimes use email to find out the status of their service request status – far from the typical consumer experience.

■ Only 32% of managers say that they receive notifications of estimated delivery times, compared to 66% for consumer services.

“If companies don’t transform the process behind the workplace service, it’s like buying a shiny, new car and hitching up a team of horses in front,” said Wright. “Automation can only go so far with a shoddy process. Just as consumer services companies have purpose‑built their services, so must the workplace.”

Closing the Gap

According to ServiceNow, companies can close the gap between consumer service experiences and the workplace by focusing on streamlining the process, injecting automation and creating a frontend that delights the user.

Here’s an outline of the steps they can take:

■ Identify work tasks that require coordination among employees or across departments.

■ Outline the coordination process and then define what it should be.

■ Design an intuitive, frictionless interface for employees.

■ Tap into consumer‑like techniques such as portals, workflows and catalogs.

■ Track and analyze the services.

By adopting service management software and practices, organizations can transform the employee experience, making it as easy and enjoyable to get work done at the office as it is at home.

Methodology: ServiceNow commissioned Lawless Research to design and conduct a study about the state of work in companies with 500 or more employees. The 10‑minute survey was fielded between March 25 and April 4, 2016 in Australia, France, Germany, Singapore, the US and the UK. The survey respondents included 2,400 managers who supervise at least one employee and use interdepartmental services. Research Now, an independent market research company, hosted the online survey and provided respondents from their panel. The margin of error for the study is ±2.0 percentage points at the 95% level of confidence. Tests of significant difference were conducted at the .01 level (99% probability that the difference is real, not by chance).

The following is a list of 8 criteria comprising the Service Experience Index:

1. Services are easy to request or order
2. The entire process of the services from request to delivery is fast
3. The services can be accessed via mobile device to check the status or request
4. It’s quick to find what services or products are available
5. Alerts on status of the request are provided
6. Alerts on estimated delivery times are provided
7. It’s easy to compare services with others available
8. Recommendations are provided based on previous selections

Share this

The Latest

March 26, 2020

While remote work policies have been gaining steam for the better part of the past decade across the enterprise space — driven in large part by more agile and scalable, cloud-delivered business solutions — recent events have pushed adoption into overdrive ...

March 25, 2020

Time-critical, unplanned work caused by IT disruptions continues to plague enterprises around the world, leading to lost revenue, significant employee morale problems and missed opportunities to innovate, according to the State of Unplanned Work Report 2020, conducted by Dimensional Research for PagerDuty ...

March 24, 2020

In today's iterative world, development teams care a lot more about how apps are running. There's a demand for fixing actionable items. Developers want to know exactly what's broken, what to fix right now, and what can wait. They want to know, "Do we build or fix?" This trade-off between building new features versus fixing bugs is one of the key factors behind the adoption of Application Stability management tools ...

March 23, 2020

With the rise of mobile apps and iterative development releases, Application Stability has answered the widespread need to monitor applications in a new way, shifting the focus from servers and networks to the customer experience. The emergence of Application Stability has caused some consternation for diehard APM fans. However, these two solutions embody very distinct monitoring focuses, which leads me to believe there's room for both tools, as well as different teams for both ...

March 19, 2020

The 2019 State of E-Commerce Infrastructure Report, from Webscale, analyzes findings from a comprehensive survey of more than 450 ecommerce professionals regarding how their online stores performed during the 2019 holiday season. Some key insights from the report include ...

March 18, 2020

Robinhood is a unicorn startup that has been disrupting the way by which many millennials have been investing and managing their money for the past few years. For Robinhood, the burden of proof was to show that they can provide an infrastructure that is as scalable, reliable and secure as that of major banks who have been developing their trading infrastructure for the last quarter-century. That promise fell flat last week, when the market volatility brought about a set of edge cases that brought Robinhood's trading app to its knees ...

March 17, 2020

Application backend monitoring is the key to acquiring visibility across the enterprise's application stack, from the application layer and underlying infrastructure to third-party API services, web servers and databases, be they on-premises, in a public or private cloud, or in a hybrid model. By tracking and reporting performance in real time, IT teams can ensure applications perform at peak efficiency — and guarantee a seamless customer experience. How can IT operations teams improve application backend monitoring? By embracing artificial intelligence for operations — AIOps ...

March 16, 2020

In 2020, DevOps teams will face heightened expectations for higher speed and frequency of code delivery, which means their IT environments will become even more modular, ephemeral and dynamic — and significantly more complicated to monitor. As a result, AIOps will further cement its position as the most effective technology that DevOps teams can use to see and control what's going on with their applications and their underlying infrastructure, so that they can prevent outages. Here I outline five key trends to watch related to how AIOps will impact DevOps in 2020 and beyond ...

March 12, 2020

With the spread of the coronavirus (COVID-19), CIOs should focus on three short-term actions to increase their organizations' resilience against disruptions and prepare for rebound and growth, according to Gartner ...

March 11, 2020

Whether you consider the first generation of APM or the updates that followed for SOA and microservices, the most basic premise of the tools remains the same — PROVIDE VISIBILITY ...