Skip to main content

As CIOs Address App Sprawl, Observability Can't Be an Afterthought

Bill Lobig
IBM Software

App sprawl has been a concern for technologists for some time, but it has never presented such a challenge as now. As organizations move to implement generative AI into their applications, it's only going to become more complex. In fact, a recent Canva report found that 72% of CIOs see application sprawl as a challenge — and with 71% of CIOs expecting to adopt 30-60 new apps this year, this complexity is poised to keep growing.

Potential solutions include consolidating applications, optimizing workflows, and automating IT processes to reduce strain on technologists so they can tackle the issue of app sprawl head-on. While these are all valid and necessary approaches, observability is a necessary component for understanding the vast amounts of complex data within AI-infused applications, and it must be the centerpiece of an app- and data-centric strategy to truly manage app sprawl.

Cracking the Code for AI App Sprawl Challenges

In a year of elevated global IT spend, ensuring investments aren't wasted is a necessity for overwhelmed technology leaders, who not only must make decisions around which technologies to implement, but also make sense of application performance amid growing tides of vast and complex data.

When AI enters the mix, it's even more important to have complete visibility, which many organizations still lack. Observability tools and practices can help technologists address AI app sprawl by providing visibility into the performance, behavior, and dependencies of AI applications. Unfortunately, many teams are still attempting to work with incomplete visibility, meaning they simply don't know what they don't know.

Simply put, traditional application performance monitoring (APM) tools can provide visibility to a certain degree, but they weren't built to necessarily account for the influx of generative AI applications that modern enterprises are dealing with.

End-users for generative AI-infused applications demand continuous availability and frictionless experience. However, with a lack of real-time visibility, they will feel when an outage or delay compromises their experience, particularly as applications span numerous platforms. Not to mention, the implementation and understanding of complex generative AI models' behaviors are still something many organizations are working to figure out. These potential blind spots could create significant performance, compliance, and security issues.

Observe the Full Stack So You Can Add to It

Organizations can better understand the internal state of their AI applications by analyzing their external outputs with observability. When this is connected to business outcomes and effectively addressed, technology teams can lay the groundwork for a well-functioning application monitoring and management process. So, when generative AI is introduced to the environment, the foundation is already in place to effectively see and optimize application processes.

As generative AI applications join the enterprise equation, observability tools are a must-have for facilitating the delivery of higher-quality software at a faster pace — these are best enabled through:

Finding and fixing the "unknown unknowns": You can't fix what you can't see. Unfortunately, many monitoring practices and tools can only address flaws that are previously known. Observability uncovers conditions that would be impossible to find manually or with traditional platforms. It then monitors the correlation to different performance flaws and gives context for discovering root causes, resulting in quick and easy remediation.

Detecting and remediating issues early on: With observability, monitoring is integrated into the initial stages of software development. It's then easy to pinpoint and rectify new code issues before they affect the service level agreements (SLAs) and customer experience.

Self-healing application infrastructure and automated resolution: Observability can be coupled with automation capabilities to anticipate issues from system outputs and resolve them autonomously without requiring manual intervention.

Scaling and load balancing: We need to be able to observe and control the current load on systems but also help forecast future demands. The data can be used to optimize applications in real-time without having the end-users feel any impact.

Cost management: From optimizing workloads to computational resources, SREs can and should find ways to save on VM, GPU, cloud and inferencing costs through observability.

Observability is crucial for organizations to address AI app sprawl and overcome myriad challenges that come along with it, especially as generative AI becomes a mainstay across enterprises. By following observability best practices and deploying the right automated tools, organizations can proactively identify and resolve issues and ensure all AI applications are always available and friction-free.

Bill Lobig is VP, Automation Product Management, IBM Software

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...

As CIOs Address App Sprawl, Observability Can't Be an Afterthought

Bill Lobig
IBM Software

App sprawl has been a concern for technologists for some time, but it has never presented such a challenge as now. As organizations move to implement generative AI into their applications, it's only going to become more complex. In fact, a recent Canva report found that 72% of CIOs see application sprawl as a challenge — and with 71% of CIOs expecting to adopt 30-60 new apps this year, this complexity is poised to keep growing.

Potential solutions include consolidating applications, optimizing workflows, and automating IT processes to reduce strain on technologists so they can tackle the issue of app sprawl head-on. While these are all valid and necessary approaches, observability is a necessary component for understanding the vast amounts of complex data within AI-infused applications, and it must be the centerpiece of an app- and data-centric strategy to truly manage app sprawl.

Cracking the Code for AI App Sprawl Challenges

In a year of elevated global IT spend, ensuring investments aren't wasted is a necessity for overwhelmed technology leaders, who not only must make decisions around which technologies to implement, but also make sense of application performance amid growing tides of vast and complex data.

When AI enters the mix, it's even more important to have complete visibility, which many organizations still lack. Observability tools and practices can help technologists address AI app sprawl by providing visibility into the performance, behavior, and dependencies of AI applications. Unfortunately, many teams are still attempting to work with incomplete visibility, meaning they simply don't know what they don't know.

Simply put, traditional application performance monitoring (APM) tools can provide visibility to a certain degree, but they weren't built to necessarily account for the influx of generative AI applications that modern enterprises are dealing with.

End-users for generative AI-infused applications demand continuous availability and frictionless experience. However, with a lack of real-time visibility, they will feel when an outage or delay compromises their experience, particularly as applications span numerous platforms. Not to mention, the implementation and understanding of complex generative AI models' behaviors are still something many organizations are working to figure out. These potential blind spots could create significant performance, compliance, and security issues.

Observe the Full Stack So You Can Add to It

Organizations can better understand the internal state of their AI applications by analyzing their external outputs with observability. When this is connected to business outcomes and effectively addressed, technology teams can lay the groundwork for a well-functioning application monitoring and management process. So, when generative AI is introduced to the environment, the foundation is already in place to effectively see and optimize application processes.

As generative AI applications join the enterprise equation, observability tools are a must-have for facilitating the delivery of higher-quality software at a faster pace — these are best enabled through:

Finding and fixing the "unknown unknowns": You can't fix what you can't see. Unfortunately, many monitoring practices and tools can only address flaws that are previously known. Observability uncovers conditions that would be impossible to find manually or with traditional platforms. It then monitors the correlation to different performance flaws and gives context for discovering root causes, resulting in quick and easy remediation.

Detecting and remediating issues early on: With observability, monitoring is integrated into the initial stages of software development. It's then easy to pinpoint and rectify new code issues before they affect the service level agreements (SLAs) and customer experience.

Self-healing application infrastructure and automated resolution: Observability can be coupled with automation capabilities to anticipate issues from system outputs and resolve them autonomously without requiring manual intervention.

Scaling and load balancing: We need to be able to observe and control the current load on systems but also help forecast future demands. The data can be used to optimize applications in real-time without having the end-users feel any impact.

Cost management: From optimizing workloads to computational resources, SREs can and should find ways to save on VM, GPU, cloud and inferencing costs through observability.

Observability is crucial for organizations to address AI app sprawl and overcome myriad challenges that come along with it, especially as generative AI becomes a mainstay across enterprises. By following observability best practices and deploying the right automated tools, organizations can proactively identify and resolve issues and ensure all AI applications are always available and friction-free.

Bill Lobig is VP, Automation Product Management, IBM Software

Hot Topics

The Latest

Like most digital transformation shifts, organizations often prioritize productivity and leave security and observability to keep pace. This usually translates to both the mass implementation of new technology and fragmented monitoring and observability (M&O) tooling. In the era of AI and varied cloud architecture, a disparate observability function can be dangerous. IT teams will lack a complete picture of their IT environment, making it harder to diagnose issues while slowing down mean time to resolve (MTTR). In fact, according to recent data from the SolarWinds State of Monitoring & Observability Report, 77% of IT personnel said the lack of visibility across their on-prem and cloud architecture was an issue ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 23, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses the NetOps labor shortage ... 

Technology management is evolving, and in turn, so is the scope of FinOps. The FinOps Foundation recently updated their mission statement from "advancing the people who manage the value of cloud" to "advancing the people who manage the value of technology." This seemingly small change solidifies a larger evolution: FinOps practitioners have organically expanded to be focused on more than just cloud cost optimization. Today, FinOps teams are largely — and quickly — expanding their job descriptions, evolving into a critical function for managing the full value of technology ...

Enterprises are under pressure to scale AI quickly. Yet despite considerable investment, adoption continues to stall. One of the most overlooked reasons is vendor sprawl ... In reality, no organization deliberately sets out to create sprawling vendor ecosystems. More often, complexity accumulates over time through well-intentioned initiatives, such as enterprise-wide digital transformation efforts, point solutions, or decentralized sourcing strategies ...

Nearly every conversation about AI eventually circles back to compute. GPUs dominate the headlines while cloud platforms compete for workloads and model benchmarks drive investment decisions. But underneath that noise, a quieter infrastructure challenge is taking shape. The real bottleneck in enterprise AI is not processing power, it is the ability to store, manage and retrieve the relentless volumes of data that AI systems generate, consume and multiply ...

The 2026 Observability Survey from Grafana Labs paints a vivid picture of an industry maturing fast, where AI is welcomed with careful conditions, SaaS economics are reshaping spending decisions, complexity remains a defining challenge, and open standards continue to underpin it all ...

The observability industry has an evolving relationship with AI. We're not skeptics, but it's clear that trust in AI must be earned ... In Grafana Labs' annual Observability Survey, 92% said they see real value in AI surfacing anomalies before they cause downtime. Another 91% endorsed AI for forecasting and root cause analysis. So while the demand is there, customers need it to be trustworthy, as the survey also found that the practitioners most enthusiastic about AI are also the most insistent on explainability ...

In the modern enterprise, the conversation around AI has moved past skepticism toward a stage of active adoption. According to our 2026 State of IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous AI, nearly 90% of IT professionals view AI as a net positive, and this optimism is well-founded. We are seeing agentic AI move beyond simple automation to actively streamlining complex data insights and eliminating the manual toil that has long hindered innovation. However, as we integrate these autonomous agents into our ecosystems, the fundamental DNA of the IT role is evolving ...

AI workloads require an enormous amount of computing power ... What's also becoming abundantly clear is just how quickly AI's computing needs are leading to enterprise systems failure. According to Cockroach Labs' State of AI Infrastructure 2026 report, enterprise systems are much closer to failure than their organizations realize. The report ... suggests AI scale could cause widespread failures in as little as one year — making it a clear risk for business performance and reliability.

The quietest week your engineering team has ever had might also be its best. No alarms going off. No escalations. No frantic Teams or Slack threads at 2 a.m. Everything humming along exactly as it should. And somewhere in a leadership meeting, someone looks at the metrics dashboard, sees a flat line of incidents and says: "Seems like things are pretty calm over there. Do we really need all those people?" ... I've spent many years in engineering, and this pattern keeps repeating ...