CMDB/CMS Use Cases: Change Management and Change Impact Analysis

Change Management and Change Impact Analysis are at the very heart of the CMDB/CMS value set. This includes change management for impact analysis of changes to Configuration Items (CIs) and their associated services, as well as change automation for activating changes (release) management. Many vendors favored one over the other, although Value Leaders did well in both. This category in the radar also included capacity planning and infrastructure optimization in support of service delivery -- an area often requested but until recently not largely supported through CMDB/CMS initiatives.

Other use cases for change management include:

Governance and Compliance: Managing change to support security-related, industry-related and other compliance-driven audits can be even more costly and labor intensive than asset-specific audits. One of EMA’s consulting clients estimates that a CMDB in hindsight could have saved them nearly $5 million in consulting costs.

Service Availability and Performance: EMA estimates that roughly 60% of IT service disruptions come from the impacts of planned or unplanned changes across the application infrastructure.

Data Center Consolidation: With the rise of virtualization in the data center, planning new options for data center consolidation is definitely on the uptake. Mergers and acquisitions can also factor in as a driver for data center consolidation.

Disaster Recovery: Automating change in case of disaster is one of the more pervasive drivers for CMDB/CMS initiatives.

Facilities management and Green IT: Extending the role of IT governance to areas external to traditional IT boundaries (facilities, power, etc.) requires core capabilities for capturing CMS-related interdependencies and exploiting the "logical and physical" extensions of CMS modeling.

Support for Provisioning New Application Services: This can include cloud-related service provisioning potentially via service catalogs and blueprints, as well as more traditionally developed (in-house developed) applications. The CMDB/CMS role in supporting Dev Ops is just now beginning to take on new life -- although it’s not brand new. I’ve seen examples of this use case going back as many as five years.


Figure 3: Change Management and Change Impact Analysis pose a greater foundational set of insights into interdependencies, and so application dependency mapping, configuration, asset management and capacity management are all in black. In many respects, it’s the heart of what CMDB/CMS capabilities are all about.

The following vendors were Value Leaders in EMA’s CMDB/CMS radar:

Axios

Axios received the highest overall score in the radar for Change Management. Among the things that stood out most about assyst were its strong support for third-party integration in discovery combined with a staging area; and its proven integrations with third-party application dependency mapping solutions for service impact analysis -- including those from VMware, BMC, and IBM. Axios also won an award as “Most Balanced CMDB/CMS functionality” across all three use cases.

N(i)2

N(i)2 lead dramatically in Architecture and Integration and Functionality, and was also significantly ahead of average in Deployment and Administration. One way to get a feel for N(i)2’s unique depth are the change management histories it keeps beyond traditional IT technology boundaries—such as: slot occupancy in chassis; rack mounting position, power management, WAN circuit, etc. Although it is highly applicable to enterprises, N(i)2 remains best understood to date by service providers. N(i)2 also won the award for “Most Innovative CMDB/CMS Deployment.”

Numara

Numara FootPrints scored well above the average in Change Management, leading in Cost Advantage, Administration and Deployment, with scores just slightly under in Functionality and Architecture and Integration. According to Numara, Change Management is its fastest ROI and this was borne out by customer interviews as well. However, it should be pointed out that across the broader FootPrints family, change management and lifecycle asset management are so closely intertwined.

ServiceNow

ServiceNow significantly outperformed the vendor average in all areas. It received best overall score in Deployment and Administration, in the top third for Cost Advantage. It was also well in the top half for Architecture and Integration, and in the top third for functionality. This shouldn’t be surprising given its rich automation capabilities (IT Process Automation or runbook plus workflow) combined with its Service-now Discovery and Dependency Mapping. As you may have noticed, this is the second time ServiceNow appears as a value leader.

SunView Software

SunView Software’s ChangeGear scored meaningfully above average in Deployment and Administration, Functionality, and Architecture and Integration. SunView was dramatically ahead in Change Management in Cost Advantage. And indeed, no vendor in EMA’s radar was more optimally tuned to address Change Management in mid-tier and mid-tier enterprise environments where administration and cost are strong counterweights to functionality and architecture.

Click here to read the CMDB/CMS use cases for Asset Management and Financial Optimization

Click here to read the CMDB/CMS use cases for Service Impact Management

Hot Topics

The Latest

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

5 Security Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Apply to Leadership

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...

CMDB/CMS Use Cases: Change Management and Change Impact Analysis

Change Management and Change Impact Analysis are at the very heart of the CMDB/CMS value set. This includes change management for impact analysis of changes to Configuration Items (CIs) and their associated services, as well as change automation for activating changes (release) management. Many vendors favored one over the other, although Value Leaders did well in both. This category in the radar also included capacity planning and infrastructure optimization in support of service delivery -- an area often requested but until recently not largely supported through CMDB/CMS initiatives.

Other use cases for change management include:

Governance and Compliance: Managing change to support security-related, industry-related and other compliance-driven audits can be even more costly and labor intensive than asset-specific audits. One of EMA’s consulting clients estimates that a CMDB in hindsight could have saved them nearly $5 million in consulting costs.

Service Availability and Performance: EMA estimates that roughly 60% of IT service disruptions come from the impacts of planned or unplanned changes across the application infrastructure.

Data Center Consolidation: With the rise of virtualization in the data center, planning new options for data center consolidation is definitely on the uptake. Mergers and acquisitions can also factor in as a driver for data center consolidation.

Disaster Recovery: Automating change in case of disaster is one of the more pervasive drivers for CMDB/CMS initiatives.

Facilities management and Green IT: Extending the role of IT governance to areas external to traditional IT boundaries (facilities, power, etc.) requires core capabilities for capturing CMS-related interdependencies and exploiting the "logical and physical" extensions of CMS modeling.

Support for Provisioning New Application Services: This can include cloud-related service provisioning potentially via service catalogs and blueprints, as well as more traditionally developed (in-house developed) applications. The CMDB/CMS role in supporting Dev Ops is just now beginning to take on new life -- although it’s not brand new. I’ve seen examples of this use case going back as many as five years.


Figure 3: Change Management and Change Impact Analysis pose a greater foundational set of insights into interdependencies, and so application dependency mapping, configuration, asset management and capacity management are all in black. In many respects, it’s the heart of what CMDB/CMS capabilities are all about.

The following vendors were Value Leaders in EMA’s CMDB/CMS radar:

Axios

Axios received the highest overall score in the radar for Change Management. Among the things that stood out most about assyst were its strong support for third-party integration in discovery combined with a staging area; and its proven integrations with third-party application dependency mapping solutions for service impact analysis -- including those from VMware, BMC, and IBM. Axios also won an award as “Most Balanced CMDB/CMS functionality” across all three use cases.

N(i)2

N(i)2 lead dramatically in Architecture and Integration and Functionality, and was also significantly ahead of average in Deployment and Administration. One way to get a feel for N(i)2’s unique depth are the change management histories it keeps beyond traditional IT technology boundaries—such as: slot occupancy in chassis; rack mounting position, power management, WAN circuit, etc. Although it is highly applicable to enterprises, N(i)2 remains best understood to date by service providers. N(i)2 also won the award for “Most Innovative CMDB/CMS Deployment.”

Numara

Numara FootPrints scored well above the average in Change Management, leading in Cost Advantage, Administration and Deployment, with scores just slightly under in Functionality and Architecture and Integration. According to Numara, Change Management is its fastest ROI and this was borne out by customer interviews as well. However, it should be pointed out that across the broader FootPrints family, change management and lifecycle asset management are so closely intertwined.

ServiceNow

ServiceNow significantly outperformed the vendor average in all areas. It received best overall score in Deployment and Administration, in the top third for Cost Advantage. It was also well in the top half for Architecture and Integration, and in the top third for functionality. This shouldn’t be surprising given its rich automation capabilities (IT Process Automation or runbook plus workflow) combined with its Service-now Discovery and Dependency Mapping. As you may have noticed, this is the second time ServiceNow appears as a value leader.

SunView Software

SunView Software’s ChangeGear scored meaningfully above average in Deployment and Administration, Functionality, and Architecture and Integration. SunView was dramatically ahead in Change Management in Cost Advantage. And indeed, no vendor in EMA’s radar was more optimally tuned to address Change Management in mid-tier and mid-tier enterprise environments where administration and cost are strong counterweights to functionality and architecture.

Click here to read the CMDB/CMS use cases for Asset Management and Financial Optimization

Click here to read the CMDB/CMS use cases for Service Impact Management

Hot Topics

The Latest

How AI Agents Are Reshaping DataOps for the Always-On Enterprise

Enterprises today operate in a real-time environment where uninterrupted access to trusted data has become a baseline expectation for users, applications and automated systems. Traditional DataOps models, built on manual effort and human triage, cannot keep pace with this always active demand. AI agents are emerging as the operational backbone, ensuring consistent data availability, reinforcing trustworthiness and enabling a level of scale that manual processes cannot achieve ...

AI Deepfakes: Rethinking Trust in the Workplace

For decades, trust in the digital workplace rested on familiar signals. We trusted faces on video calls, voices on the phone, and emails that appeared to come from people we knew. These cues felt human and intuitive. They anchored how decisions were made, approvals were granted, and access was authorized. AI-powered deepfakes have quietly broken that model ...

Nine in Ten Enterprises Plan Cloud Data Repatriation amid Rising Cloud Costs and Data Sovereignty Mandates

Cloud migration was supposed to be a one-way door. For most enterprises, it turns out it isn't. Cloud data repatriation is a real and growing trend. A new survey ... finds that 89% of organizations plan to expand their on-premises infrastructure footprint over the next two years — and 75% have already moved at least some workloads back from public cloud in the past 24 months. The findings point to a broad rethinking of where data belongs ...

Why ITOps Need Right-Sized AI, Not Bigger Models

Over the past few years, large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the software industry. Given their ability to excel at multi-step reasoning, LLMs have helped enterprises streamline workflows and adapt to the unknown. However, employing such models comes with sky-high costs, latency issues, and limited flexibility. In the realm of IT operations, it is generally wiser to employ smaller, domain-specific models instead ...

The End of Reactive DevOps: AI-Driven Observability for Zero-Defect Digital Systems

For years, DevOps teams operated under a simple assumption: collect enough telemetry, and you can find and fix any problem. That assumption is breaking down. Modern enterprises now operate across microservices, hybrid cloud environments, APIs, Kubernetes, and highly automated delivery pipelines. Releases happen continuously, dependencies shift constantly, and failures spread faster than teams can diagnose them ...

5 Takeaways from the Observability Forecast for Media and Entertainment

New Relic surveyed IT and engineering leaders from the media and entertainment (M&E) sector to understand what's working — and where challenges persist with their observability practices. The findings reveal how M&E organizations are navigating rising platform complexity, audience expectations, and AI-driven change. Below are five takeaways that stand out ...

Why Moving Off the Cloud Is the Easy Part and What Comes Next Is Where Things Get Hard

Let me start with something I've seen play out more times than I can count. A team hits a wall with the cloud. Costs creep up, then spike. Performance starts to feel inconsistent. Someone in finance asks a simple question like "why did this double?" and nobody has a clean answer ... Maybe this isn't the right place for everything. That realization feels like a breakthrough, like you've identified the problem. In reality, you've just identified the starting line ...

MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Podcast - Episode 24: Network Observability Tool Sprawl

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 24, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses network observability tool sprawl ... 

Capacity Isn't a Guess: Observability-Driven Sizing for On-Prem Databases

In cloud-native systems, scaling is often as simple as moving a slider. For on-premise databases, the stakes are different. Over-provisioning hardware is expensive. Under-provisioning leads to performance bottlenecks that are difficult to fix once the equipment is in the rack ...

5 Security Principles Every Entrepreneur Should Apply to Leadership

When most people think about cybersecurity, they picture firewalls, encryption, and access controls — technical tools designed to protect systems and data. But beneath the technology lies a deeper set of principles about trust, decision-making, and resilience ... The best leaders don't eliminate risk. They manage it intelligently. And in many ways, cybersecurity offers a surprisingly useful playbook for doing exactly that ...