Skip to main content

Digital Transformation Needs Intentionality

Larry Dragich

With the convergence of technology finding its way from the corporate world to our personal devices and home appliances, meeting the expectations of a quality customer experience is a formidable challenge.

Digital Transformation seems to be on everyone's radar but if there is no intentionality from the IT Executive who is sponsoring the program it becomes more of a loose correlation of technology initiatives under an IT strategy banner.

Consider some of the initiatives: Data/Analytics, Mobile Technology, Private Cloud, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning, and the Internet of Things (IoT). All have their own unique role to play that is intrinsic to a Digital Transformation program. Although, when you step back and consider how to measure the success for such a program, things can get a little murky.

Digital Transformation requires more than just the latest technology, it's a mindset that iterative change is on the way and should be embraced. This also requires us to factor in the people and process parts of the equation and find ways to measure the end-user-experience (EUE).

One way to do this is to sponsor an Application Performance Monitoring (APM) initiative that can provide visibility to the business, help communicate the progress, and highlight the impacts to the organization.

Meaningful metrics can be difficult to obtain without a specific focus on business impact (transactions) and a concise way to collect them. Consider that a strong APM solution opens the door for better clarity on how each technology initiative affects the EUE, providing key metrics for a Digital Transformation program.

I recommend including all three monitoring factions within an APM strategy, Wire Data Analytics, Synthetic Transactions, and Agent Code Instrumentation.

1. Wire Data Analytics- Discover and decipher application performance data as it traverses the network.

2. Synthetic Transactions- Web robots that execute specific transactions for location-based availability and act as a barometer for measuring application performance.

3. Agent Code Instrumentation- Lightweight agents monitoring the application code as it executes from the Web and App servers. To gain visibility at the edge, script injection is often used for client render time.

Utilizing these overarching delivery mechanisms to provide input into a Machine Learning and/or AI solution has the potential to dramatically improve application delivery and performance across a variety of IT disciplines. This also lays the ground work to support a DevOps culture, providing an amplified feedback loop that is so desperately needed.

Once you develop a strategy on the best way to bring together the 3 monitoring factions, APM becomes "table stakes" on the digital transformation front because you can't improve what you don't measure.

The Latest

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...

Digital Transformation Needs Intentionality

Larry Dragich

With the convergence of technology finding its way from the corporate world to our personal devices and home appliances, meeting the expectations of a quality customer experience is a formidable challenge.

Digital Transformation seems to be on everyone's radar but if there is no intentionality from the IT Executive who is sponsoring the program it becomes more of a loose correlation of technology initiatives under an IT strategy banner.

Consider some of the initiatives: Data/Analytics, Mobile Technology, Private Cloud, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning, and the Internet of Things (IoT). All have their own unique role to play that is intrinsic to a Digital Transformation program. Although, when you step back and consider how to measure the success for such a program, things can get a little murky.

Digital Transformation requires more than just the latest technology, it's a mindset that iterative change is on the way and should be embraced. This also requires us to factor in the people and process parts of the equation and find ways to measure the end-user-experience (EUE).

One way to do this is to sponsor an Application Performance Monitoring (APM) initiative that can provide visibility to the business, help communicate the progress, and highlight the impacts to the organization.

Meaningful metrics can be difficult to obtain without a specific focus on business impact (transactions) and a concise way to collect them. Consider that a strong APM solution opens the door for better clarity on how each technology initiative affects the EUE, providing key metrics for a Digital Transformation program.

I recommend including all three monitoring factions within an APM strategy, Wire Data Analytics, Synthetic Transactions, and Agent Code Instrumentation.

1. Wire Data Analytics- Discover and decipher application performance data as it traverses the network.

2. Synthetic Transactions- Web robots that execute specific transactions for location-based availability and act as a barometer for measuring application performance.

3. Agent Code Instrumentation- Lightweight agents monitoring the application code as it executes from the Web and App servers. To gain visibility at the edge, script injection is often used for client render time.

Utilizing these overarching delivery mechanisms to provide input into a Machine Learning and/or AI solution has the potential to dramatically improve application delivery and performance across a variety of IT disciplines. This also lays the ground work to support a DevOps culture, providing an amplified feedback loop that is so desperately needed.

Once you develop a strategy on the best way to bring together the 3 monitoring factions, APM becomes "table stakes" on the digital transformation front because you can't improve what you don't measure.

The Latest

For years, production operations teams have treated alert fatigue as a quality-of-life problem: something that makes on-call rotations miserable but isn't considered a direct contributor to outages. That framing doesn't capture how these systems fail, and we now have data to show why. More importantly, it's now clear alert fatigue is a symptom of a deeper issue: production systems have outgrown the current operational approaches ...

I was on a customer call last fall when an enterprise architect said something I haven't been able to shake. Her team had just spent four months trying to swap one AI vendor for another. The original plan said three weeks. "We didn't switch vendors," she told me. "We rebuilt half our integrations and discovered what we'd actually been depending on." Most enterprise leaders don't expect that to be the experience ...

Ask any senior SRE or platform engineer what keeps them up at night, and the answer probably isn't the monitoring tool — it's the data feeding it. The proliferation of APM, observability, and AIOps platforms has created a telemetry sprawl problem that most teams manage reactively rather than architect proactively. Metrics are going to one platform. Traces routed somewhere else. Logs duplicated across multiple backends because nobody wants to be caught without them when something breaks. Every redundant stream costs money ...

80% of respondents agree that the IT role is shifting from operators to orchestrators, according to the 2026 IT Trends Report: The Human Side of Autonomous IT from SolarWinds ...

40% of organizations deploying AI will implement dedicated AI observability tools by 2028 to monitor model performance, bias and outputs, according to Gartner ...

Until AI-powered engineering tools have live visibility of how code behaves at runtime, they cannot be trusted to autonomously ensure reliable systems, according to the State of AI-Powered Engineering Report 2026 report from Lightrun. The report reveals that a major volume of manual work is required when AI-generated code is deployed: 43% of AI-generated code requires manual debugging in production, even after passing QA or staging tests. Furthermore, an average of three manual redeploy cycles are required to verify a single AI-suggested code fix in production ...

Many organizations describe AI as strategic, but they do not manage it strategically. When AI plans are disconnected from strategy, detached from organizational learning, and protected from serious assumptions testing, the problem is no longer technical immaturity; it is a failure of management discipline ... Executives too often tell organizations to "use AI" before they define what AI is supposed to change. The problem deepens in organizations where strategy isn't well articulated in the first place ...

Across the enterprise technology landscape, a quiet crisis is playing out. Organizations have run hundreds, sometimes thousands, of generative AI pilots. Leadership has celebrated the proof of concept (POCs) ... Industry experience points to a sobering reality: only 5-10% of AI POCs that progress to the pilot stage successfully reach scaled production. The remaining 90% fail because the enterprise environment around them was never ready to absorb them, not the AI models ...

Today's modern systems are not what they once were. Organizations now rely on distributed systems, event-driven workflows, hybrid and multi-cloud environments and continuous delivery pipelines. While each adds flexibility, it also introduces new, often invisible failures. Development speed is no longer the primary bottleneck of innovation. Reliability is ...

Seeing is believing, or in this case, seeing is understanding, according to New Relic's 2025 Observability Forecast for Retail and eCommerce report. Retailers who want to provide exceptional customer experiences while improving IT operations efficiency are leaning on observability ... Here are five key takeaways from the report ...