Skip to main content

How GenAI's Adoption Journey Is Mirroring Cloud Computing's Earlier Path

Jonathan LaCour
Mission

If you've been in the tech space for a while, you may be experiencing some deja vu. Though often compared to the adoption and proliferation of the internet, Generative AI (GenAI) is following in the footsteps of cloud computing.

Like cloud computing before it, GenAI is moving through recognizable adoption stages: early hype and skepticism evolving into grassroots implementation through unofficial channels, eventually giving way to formalized organizational adoption. Just as cloud technology required IT teams to transform their operations, GenAI tools will spur a big-picture rethinking of everyday work processes across sectors. Employees who integrate these powerful capabilities will benefit from enhanced productivity and results, but those resistant to change may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.

GenAI and Cloud Computing: Early Doubts Evolved to Competitive Advantages

Cloud computing initially faced uncertainty from IT departments concerned about security risks, loss of control, and managing data in external environments. When faced with a transformative and disruptive technology, some organizations hesitated to entrust their systems to cloud providers justified by fear of change, potential but unfounded security concerns, and a fundamentally different cost model.

However, the competitive disadvantages of avoiding cloud adoption eventually forced technology professionals to evolve their skillsets. Today, cloud computing represents a $600+ billion market expected to grow at 21% annually through 2030. Early adopters gained substantial advantages as they embraced the cloud, advancing their careers to more prestigious Cloud Architect roles that paved the way for future-proofed professional success.

GenAI is following a remarkably similar but accelerated trajectory. Workers in potentially disrupted fields like software development and marketing initially resisted GenAI due to perceived threats. The reality is that GenAI isn't replacing jobs — it's making them better by allowing people to work smarter, not harder. Workers who embrace GenAI as an opportunity to enhance their existing work and skill sets will have a leg up over those who fear it.

Those who were willing to embrace GenAI early are already experiencing dramatic efficiency improvements that have started to drive widespread adoption. Dev teams are finding innovative problem-solving approaches and fundamentally reshaping their workflows. In the near future, developers may spend as much time guiding AI to build solutions as they do writing code themselves. While only 24% of application developers currently consider themselves GenAI experts, this percentage will only go up as more are exposed to GenAI's tangible benefits.

From Resistance to Regulation

Early cloud adoption faced organizational resistance, with some IT leaders implementing policies prohibiting or drastically limiting the adoption of cloud services, often negating many of the potential benefits and feeding a harmful cycle of reduced velocity. Engineering teams, frustrated by slow traditional infrastructure provisioning, defied these restrictions and embraced on-demand capabilities. This "shadow IT" movement further accelerated cloud acceptance as developers became advocates for API-driven infrastructure, eventually pushing resistant IT leaders to adapt or face the potential negative consequences for their business.

The adoption of GenAI has trickled upward in a remarkably similar way. Regardless of their organizational policies, many employees are using GenAI daily, and as these users repeatedly demonstrate GenAI's value, executive leadership is increasingly willing to formally invest. Just like how companies transitioned from unauthorized but prolific cloud usage to Cloud Centers of Excellence with standardized policies, organizations are now creating parallel structures for GenAI with AI ethics boards and policies that provide effective guardrails without stifling adoption.

The primary differences between GenAI and cloud have been the rate of change and adoption. The GenAI timeline has been accelerated, as many organizations have institutional memory of cloud transformation. GenAI governance frameworks are being implemented quickly to facilitate cross-organizational adoption, enabling an evolution from proof of concept to production.

Much as cloud expertise became indispensable for IT specialists, proficiency in AI systems and their governance has become a fundamental requirement for contemporary tech practitioners. Professionals who have taken historical lessons to heart and chosen to embrace GenAI instead of opposing it are poised to be at the forefront of whatever the next big tech disruption may be.

Jonathan LaCour is CTO of Mission

Hot Topics

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 21, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AI-driven NetOps ... 

Enterprise IT has become increasingly complex and fragmented. Organizations are juggling dozens — sometimes hundreds — of different tools for endpoint management, security, app delivery, and employee experience. Each one needs its own license, its own maintenance, and its own integration. The result is a patchwork of overlapping tools, data stuck in silos, security vulnerabilities, and IT teams are spending more time managing software than actually getting work done ...

2025 was the year everybody finally saw the cracks in the foundation. If you were running production workloads, you probably lived through at least one outage you could not explain to your executives without pulling up a diagram and a whiteboard ...

Data has never been more central to a greater portion of enterprise operations than it is today. From software development to marketing strategy, data has become an essential component for success. But as data use cases multiply, so too does the diversity of the data itself. This shift is pushing organizations toward increasingly complex data infrastructure ...

Enterprises are not stalling because they doubt AI, but because they cannot yet govern, validate, or safely scale autonomous systems, according to The Pulse of Agentic AI 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

For most of the cloud era, site reliability engineers (SREs) were measured by their ability to protect availability, maintain performance, and reduce the operational risk of change. Cost management was someone else's responsibility, typically finance, procurement, or a dedicated FinOps team. That separation of duties made sense when infrastructure was relatively static and cloud bills grew in predictable ways. But modern cloud-native systems don't behave that way ...

How GenAI's Adoption Journey Is Mirroring Cloud Computing's Earlier Path

Jonathan LaCour
Mission

If you've been in the tech space for a while, you may be experiencing some deja vu. Though often compared to the adoption and proliferation of the internet, Generative AI (GenAI) is following in the footsteps of cloud computing.

Like cloud computing before it, GenAI is moving through recognizable adoption stages: early hype and skepticism evolving into grassroots implementation through unofficial channels, eventually giving way to formalized organizational adoption. Just as cloud technology required IT teams to transform their operations, GenAI tools will spur a big-picture rethinking of everyday work processes across sectors. Employees who integrate these powerful capabilities will benefit from enhanced productivity and results, but those resistant to change may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.

GenAI and Cloud Computing: Early Doubts Evolved to Competitive Advantages

Cloud computing initially faced uncertainty from IT departments concerned about security risks, loss of control, and managing data in external environments. When faced with a transformative and disruptive technology, some organizations hesitated to entrust their systems to cloud providers justified by fear of change, potential but unfounded security concerns, and a fundamentally different cost model.

However, the competitive disadvantages of avoiding cloud adoption eventually forced technology professionals to evolve their skillsets. Today, cloud computing represents a $600+ billion market expected to grow at 21% annually through 2030. Early adopters gained substantial advantages as they embraced the cloud, advancing their careers to more prestigious Cloud Architect roles that paved the way for future-proofed professional success.

GenAI is following a remarkably similar but accelerated trajectory. Workers in potentially disrupted fields like software development and marketing initially resisted GenAI due to perceived threats. The reality is that GenAI isn't replacing jobs — it's making them better by allowing people to work smarter, not harder. Workers who embrace GenAI as an opportunity to enhance their existing work and skill sets will have a leg up over those who fear it.

Those who were willing to embrace GenAI early are already experiencing dramatic efficiency improvements that have started to drive widespread adoption. Dev teams are finding innovative problem-solving approaches and fundamentally reshaping their workflows. In the near future, developers may spend as much time guiding AI to build solutions as they do writing code themselves. While only 24% of application developers currently consider themselves GenAI experts, this percentage will only go up as more are exposed to GenAI's tangible benefits.

From Resistance to Regulation

Early cloud adoption faced organizational resistance, with some IT leaders implementing policies prohibiting or drastically limiting the adoption of cloud services, often negating many of the potential benefits and feeding a harmful cycle of reduced velocity. Engineering teams, frustrated by slow traditional infrastructure provisioning, defied these restrictions and embraced on-demand capabilities. This "shadow IT" movement further accelerated cloud acceptance as developers became advocates for API-driven infrastructure, eventually pushing resistant IT leaders to adapt or face the potential negative consequences for their business.

The adoption of GenAI has trickled upward in a remarkably similar way. Regardless of their organizational policies, many employees are using GenAI daily, and as these users repeatedly demonstrate GenAI's value, executive leadership is increasingly willing to formally invest. Just like how companies transitioned from unauthorized but prolific cloud usage to Cloud Centers of Excellence with standardized policies, organizations are now creating parallel structures for GenAI with AI ethics boards and policies that provide effective guardrails without stifling adoption.

The primary differences between GenAI and cloud have been the rate of change and adoption. The GenAI timeline has been accelerated, as many organizations have institutional memory of cloud transformation. GenAI governance frameworks are being implemented quickly to facilitate cross-organizational adoption, enabling an evolution from proof of concept to production.

Much as cloud expertise became indispensable for IT specialists, proficiency in AI systems and their governance has become a fundamental requirement for contemporary tech practitioners. Professionals who have taken historical lessons to heart and chosen to embrace GenAI instead of opposing it are poised to be at the forefront of whatever the next big tech disruption may be.

Jonathan LaCour is CTO of Mission

Hot Topics

The Latest

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become the dominant force shaping enterprise data strategies. Boards expect progress. Executives expect returns. And data leaders are under pressure to prove that their organizations are "AI-ready" ...

Agentic AI is a major buzzword for 2026. Many tech companies are making bold promises about this technology, but many aren't grounded in reality, at least not yet. This coming year will likely be shaped by reality checks for IT teams, and progress will only come from a focus on strong foundations and disciplined execution ...

AI systems are still prone to hallucinations and misjudgments ... To build the trust needed for adoption, AI must be paired with human-in-the-loop (HITL) oversight, or checkpoints where humans verify, guide, and decide what actions are taken. The balance between autonomy and accountability is what will allow AI to deliver on its promise without sacrificing human trust ...

More data center leaders are reducing their reliance on utility grids by investing in onsite power for rapidly scaling data centers, according to the Data Center Power Report from Bloom Energy ...

In MEAN TIME TO INSIGHT Episode 21, Shamus McGillicuddy, VP of Research, Network Infrastructure and Operations, at EMA discusses AI-driven NetOps ... 

Enterprise IT has become increasingly complex and fragmented. Organizations are juggling dozens — sometimes hundreds — of different tools for endpoint management, security, app delivery, and employee experience. Each one needs its own license, its own maintenance, and its own integration. The result is a patchwork of overlapping tools, data stuck in silos, security vulnerabilities, and IT teams are spending more time managing software than actually getting work done ...

2025 was the year everybody finally saw the cracks in the foundation. If you were running production workloads, you probably lived through at least one outage you could not explain to your executives without pulling up a diagram and a whiteboard ...

Data has never been more central to a greater portion of enterprise operations than it is today. From software development to marketing strategy, data has become an essential component for success. But as data use cases multiply, so too does the diversity of the data itself. This shift is pushing organizations toward increasingly complex data infrastructure ...

Enterprises are not stalling because they doubt AI, but because they cannot yet govern, validate, or safely scale autonomous systems, according to The Pulse of Agentic AI 2026, a new report from Dynatrace ...

For most of the cloud era, site reliability engineers (SREs) were measured by their ability to protect availability, maintain performance, and reduce the operational risk of change. Cost management was someone else's responsibility, typically finance, procurement, or a dedicated FinOps team. That separation of duties made sense when infrastructure was relatively static and cloud bills grew in predictable ways. But modern cloud-native systems don't behave that way ...