Skip to main content

How GenAI's Adoption Journey Is Mirroring Cloud Computing's Earlier Path

Jonathan LaCour
Mission

If you've been in the tech space for a while, you may be experiencing some deja vu. Though often compared to the adoption and proliferation of the internet, Generative AI (GenAI) is following in the footsteps of cloud computing.

Like cloud computing before it, GenAI is moving through recognizable adoption stages: early hype and skepticism evolving into grassroots implementation through unofficial channels, eventually giving way to formalized organizational adoption. Just as cloud technology required IT teams to transform their operations, GenAI tools will spur a big-picture rethinking of everyday work processes across sectors. Employees who integrate these powerful capabilities will benefit from enhanced productivity and results, but those resistant to change may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.

GenAI and Cloud Computing: Early Doubts Evolved to Competitive Advantages

Cloud computing initially faced uncertainty from IT departments concerned about security risks, loss of control, and managing data in external environments. When faced with a transformative and disruptive technology, some organizations hesitated to entrust their systems to cloud providers justified by fear of change, potential but unfounded security concerns, and a fundamentally different cost model.

However, the competitive disadvantages of avoiding cloud adoption eventually forced technology professionals to evolve their skillsets. Today, cloud computing represents a $600+ billion market expected to grow at 21% annually through 2030. Early adopters gained substantial advantages as they embraced the cloud, advancing their careers to more prestigious Cloud Architect roles that paved the way for future-proofed professional success.

GenAI is following a remarkably similar but accelerated trajectory. Workers in potentially disrupted fields like software development and marketing initially resisted GenAI due to perceived threats. The reality is that GenAI isn't replacing jobs — it's making them better by allowing people to work smarter, not harder. Workers who embrace GenAI as an opportunity to enhance their existing work and skill sets will have a leg up over those who fear it.

Those who were willing to embrace GenAI early are already experiencing dramatic efficiency improvements that have started to drive widespread adoption. Dev teams are finding innovative problem-solving approaches and fundamentally reshaping their workflows. In the near future, developers may spend as much time guiding AI to build solutions as they do writing code themselves. While only 24% of application developers currently consider themselves GenAI experts, this percentage will only go up as more are exposed to GenAI's tangible benefits.

From Resistance to Regulation

Early cloud adoption faced organizational resistance, with some IT leaders implementing policies prohibiting or drastically limiting the adoption of cloud services, often negating many of the potential benefits and feeding a harmful cycle of reduced velocity. Engineering teams, frustrated by slow traditional infrastructure provisioning, defied these restrictions and embraced on-demand capabilities. This "shadow IT" movement further accelerated cloud acceptance as developers became advocates for API-driven infrastructure, eventually pushing resistant IT leaders to adapt or face the potential negative consequences for their business.

The adoption of GenAI has trickled upward in a remarkably similar way. Regardless of their organizational policies, many employees are using GenAI daily, and as these users repeatedly demonstrate GenAI's value, executive leadership is increasingly willing to formally invest. Just like how companies transitioned from unauthorized but prolific cloud usage to Cloud Centers of Excellence with standardized policies, organizations are now creating parallel structures for GenAI with AI ethics boards and policies that provide effective guardrails without stifling adoption.

The primary differences between GenAI and cloud have been the rate of change and adoption. The GenAI timeline has been accelerated, as many organizations have institutional memory of cloud transformation. GenAI governance frameworks are being implemented quickly to facilitate cross-organizational adoption, enabling an evolution from proof of concept to production.

Much as cloud expertise became indispensable for IT specialists, proficiency in AI systems and their governance has become a fundamental requirement for contemporary tech practitioners. Professionals who have taken historical lessons to heart and chosen to embrace GenAI instead of opposing it are poised to be at the forefront of whatever the next big tech disruption may be.

Jonathan LaCour is CTO of Mission

Hot Topics

The Latest

As businesses increasingly rely on high-performance applications to deliver seamless user experiences, the demand for fast, reliable, and scalable data storage systems has never been greater. Redis — an open-source, in-memory data structure store — has emerged as a popular choice for use cases ranging from caching to real-time analytics. But with great performance comes the need for vigilant monitoring ...

Kubernetes was not initially designed with AI's vast resource variability in mind, and the rapid rise of AI has exposed Kubernetes limitations, particularly when it comes to cost and resource efficiency. Indeed, AI workloads differ from traditional applications in that they require a staggering amount and variety of compute resources, and their consumption is far less consistent than traditional workloads ... Considering the speed of AI innovation, teams cannot afford to be bogged down by these constant infrastructure concerns. A solution is needed ...

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs ...

Misaligned architecture can lead to business consequences, with 93% of respondents reporting negative outcomes such as service disruptions, high operational costs and security challenges ...

A Gartner analyst recently suggested that GenAI tools could create 25% time savings for network operational teams. Where might these time savings come from? How are GenAI tools helping NetOps teams today, and what other tasks might they take on in the future as models continue improving? In general, these savings come from automating or streamlining manual NetOps tasks ...

IT and line-of-business teams are increasingly aligned in their efforts to close the data gap and drive greater collaboration to alleviate IT bottlenecks and offload growing demands on IT teams, according to The 2025 Automation Benchmark Report: Insights from IT Leaders on Enterprise Automation & the Future of AI-Driven Businesses from Jitterbit ...

A large majority (86%) of data management and AI decision makers cite protecting data privacy as a top concern, with 76% of respondents citing ROI on data privacy and AI initiatives across their organization, according to a new Harris Poll from Collibra ...

According to Gartner, Inc. the following six trends will shape the future of cloud over the next four years, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact ...

2020 was the equivalent of a wedding with a top-shelf open bar. As businesses scrambled to adjust to remote work, digital transformation accelerated at breakneck speed. New software categories emerged overnight. Tech stacks ballooned with all sorts of SaaS apps solving ALL the problems — often with little oversight or long-term integration planning, and yes frequently a lot of duplicated functionality ... But now the music's faded. The lights are on. Everyone from the CIO to the CFO is checking the bill. Welcome to the Great SaaS Hangover ...

Regardless of OpenShift being a scalable and flexible software, it can be a pain to monitor since complete visibility into the underlying operations is not guaranteed ... To effectively monitor an OpenShift environment, IT administrators should focus on these five key elements and their associated metrics ...

How GenAI's Adoption Journey Is Mirroring Cloud Computing's Earlier Path

Jonathan LaCour
Mission

If you've been in the tech space for a while, you may be experiencing some deja vu. Though often compared to the adoption and proliferation of the internet, Generative AI (GenAI) is following in the footsteps of cloud computing.

Like cloud computing before it, GenAI is moving through recognizable adoption stages: early hype and skepticism evolving into grassroots implementation through unofficial channels, eventually giving way to formalized organizational adoption. Just as cloud technology required IT teams to transform their operations, GenAI tools will spur a big-picture rethinking of everyday work processes across sectors. Employees who integrate these powerful capabilities will benefit from enhanced productivity and results, but those resistant to change may find themselves at a competitive disadvantage.

GenAI and Cloud Computing: Early Doubts Evolved to Competitive Advantages

Cloud computing initially faced uncertainty from IT departments concerned about security risks, loss of control, and managing data in external environments. When faced with a transformative and disruptive technology, some organizations hesitated to entrust their systems to cloud providers justified by fear of change, potential but unfounded security concerns, and a fundamentally different cost model.

However, the competitive disadvantages of avoiding cloud adoption eventually forced technology professionals to evolve their skillsets. Today, cloud computing represents a $600+ billion market expected to grow at 21% annually through 2030. Early adopters gained substantial advantages as they embraced the cloud, advancing their careers to more prestigious Cloud Architect roles that paved the way for future-proofed professional success.

GenAI is following a remarkably similar but accelerated trajectory. Workers in potentially disrupted fields like software development and marketing initially resisted GenAI due to perceived threats. The reality is that GenAI isn't replacing jobs — it's making them better by allowing people to work smarter, not harder. Workers who embrace GenAI as an opportunity to enhance their existing work and skill sets will have a leg up over those who fear it.

Those who were willing to embrace GenAI early are already experiencing dramatic efficiency improvements that have started to drive widespread adoption. Dev teams are finding innovative problem-solving approaches and fundamentally reshaping their workflows. In the near future, developers may spend as much time guiding AI to build solutions as they do writing code themselves. While only 24% of application developers currently consider themselves GenAI experts, this percentage will only go up as more are exposed to GenAI's tangible benefits.

From Resistance to Regulation

Early cloud adoption faced organizational resistance, with some IT leaders implementing policies prohibiting or drastically limiting the adoption of cloud services, often negating many of the potential benefits and feeding a harmful cycle of reduced velocity. Engineering teams, frustrated by slow traditional infrastructure provisioning, defied these restrictions and embraced on-demand capabilities. This "shadow IT" movement further accelerated cloud acceptance as developers became advocates for API-driven infrastructure, eventually pushing resistant IT leaders to adapt or face the potential negative consequences for their business.

The adoption of GenAI has trickled upward in a remarkably similar way. Regardless of their organizational policies, many employees are using GenAI daily, and as these users repeatedly demonstrate GenAI's value, executive leadership is increasingly willing to formally invest. Just like how companies transitioned from unauthorized but prolific cloud usage to Cloud Centers of Excellence with standardized policies, organizations are now creating parallel structures for GenAI with AI ethics boards and policies that provide effective guardrails without stifling adoption.

The primary differences between GenAI and cloud have been the rate of change and adoption. The GenAI timeline has been accelerated, as many organizations have institutional memory of cloud transformation. GenAI governance frameworks are being implemented quickly to facilitate cross-organizational adoption, enabling an evolution from proof of concept to production.

Much as cloud expertise became indispensable for IT specialists, proficiency in AI systems and their governance has become a fundamental requirement for contemporary tech practitioners. Professionals who have taken historical lessons to heart and chosen to embrace GenAI instead of opposing it are poised to be at the forefront of whatever the next big tech disruption may be.

Jonathan LaCour is CTO of Mission

Hot Topics

The Latest

As businesses increasingly rely on high-performance applications to deliver seamless user experiences, the demand for fast, reliable, and scalable data storage systems has never been greater. Redis — an open-source, in-memory data structure store — has emerged as a popular choice for use cases ranging from caching to real-time analytics. But with great performance comes the need for vigilant monitoring ...

Kubernetes was not initially designed with AI's vast resource variability in mind, and the rapid rise of AI has exposed Kubernetes limitations, particularly when it comes to cost and resource efficiency. Indeed, AI workloads differ from traditional applications in that they require a staggering amount and variety of compute resources, and their consumption is far less consistent than traditional workloads ... Considering the speed of AI innovation, teams cannot afford to be bogged down by these constant infrastructure concerns. A solution is needed ...

AI is the catalyst for significant investment in data teams as enterprises require higher-quality data to power their AI applications, according to the State of Analytics Engineering Report from dbt Labs ...

Misaligned architecture can lead to business consequences, with 93% of respondents reporting negative outcomes such as service disruptions, high operational costs and security challenges ...

A Gartner analyst recently suggested that GenAI tools could create 25% time savings for network operational teams. Where might these time savings come from? How are GenAI tools helping NetOps teams today, and what other tasks might they take on in the future as models continue improving? In general, these savings come from automating or streamlining manual NetOps tasks ...

IT and line-of-business teams are increasingly aligned in their efforts to close the data gap and drive greater collaboration to alleviate IT bottlenecks and offload growing demands on IT teams, according to The 2025 Automation Benchmark Report: Insights from IT Leaders on Enterprise Automation & the Future of AI-Driven Businesses from Jitterbit ...

A large majority (86%) of data management and AI decision makers cite protecting data privacy as a top concern, with 76% of respondents citing ROI on data privacy and AI initiatives across their organization, according to a new Harris Poll from Collibra ...

According to Gartner, Inc. the following six trends will shape the future of cloud over the next four years, ultimately resulting in new ways of working that are digital in nature and transformative in impact ...

2020 was the equivalent of a wedding with a top-shelf open bar. As businesses scrambled to adjust to remote work, digital transformation accelerated at breakneck speed. New software categories emerged overnight. Tech stacks ballooned with all sorts of SaaS apps solving ALL the problems — often with little oversight or long-term integration planning, and yes frequently a lot of duplicated functionality ... But now the music's faded. The lights are on. Everyone from the CIO to the CFO is checking the bill. Welcome to the Great SaaS Hangover ...

Regardless of OpenShift being a scalable and flexible software, it can be a pain to monitor since complete visibility into the underlying operations is not guaranteed ... To effectively monitor an OpenShift environment, IT administrators should focus on these five key elements and their associated metrics ...