Looking Back at 2017 APM Predictions - Did They Come True? Part 1
January 09, 2018

Jonah Kowall
Kentik

Share this

I enjoy the end of the year. Getting some downtime from the constant phone calls and meetings allows me to reflect and plan for a new year ... Planning for a new year often includes predicting what’s going to happen. However, we don't often enough look back at the prior year’s predictions to see if they actually came to fruition. That is the purpose of this analysis. I have picked out a few key areas in APMdigest's 2017 Application Performance Management Predictions, and analyzed which predictions actually came true.

Many of the 2017 predictions were not particularly predictive, but instead "observations" of what is happening and how it will accelerate or shift. Without better ground rules for what a prediction is, it's hard to say what the list is and is not. I have picked out a few key areas which encompass several of these predictions. I'm not calling out the individual predictions, which often do not align with Application Performance Management (APM) trends, but instead, serve a specific vendor (gotta love Marketing).

Review the 2017 APM Predictions on APMdigest

The first four key areas below are the predictions that didn’t come true. In addition to the the ones I have called out here, there were many predictions which have been failing for years that vendors wish would come true. Unfortunately for them, that didn't happen in 2017. Hopefully, they don't post the same prediction for 2018. :)

The following few 2017 predictions had several predictions which fell into a category:

The convergence of infrastructure metrics and APM metrics

Although many tools combine APM and infrastructure metrics, most enterprises still use separate tools due to organizational silos

Although many tools combine APM and infrastructure metrics, most enterprises still use separate tools due to organizational silos. The enterprises which run significant infrastructure continue to deploy monitoring tools for each team — meaning teams running data centers still buy tools for DCIM, network, servers, storage, and other infrastructure technologies. Those implementing cloud infrastructure often use cloud provider tools or other infrastructure monitoring tools which do a better job in those environments, and better handle time series. APM tools, have for a while had lightweight capabilities for infrastructure monitoring, and often may replace more capable infrastructure monitoring technologies, especially when migrating to managed data centers or public cloud.

Adoption of platforms to tie monitoring data together

While there are many products which attempt to tie together data coming from multiple monitoring tools, the integration posts challenges for most. Although some of these products are gaining adoption, it's not impactful to the market today. We haven't seen a shift in this market in 2017, and I doubt it will change in 2018.

AI replacing manual analysis

My perspective on AI is documented. AI is still not prominent in solutions today, even though people have been predicting it for years. The advances in making RCA faster have been helpful to users, but the manual analysis of data continues to be standard today, and likely will be for the foreseeable future. We didn't see a shift in 2017, but as I talk about below, predictive analysis and machine learning are becoming more prominent.

Data-centric to event-centric


BUT WILL BECOME TRUE AT SOME POINT

This one was ahead of its time and is a trend which has been occurring for several years. Instead of event-based systems replacing data based systems, I believe there will be an augmented platform to handle both request-response systems and data-based systems. There are many business reasons to have both capabilities within software architectures, and monitoring will naturally have to evolve to handle both types of software systems. Today most of the "event-based" monitoring systems are done with log analysis tools, as tracking events over time is often a challenge for most monitoring tools. There are some which have been able to show change over time, but not managing of event-based architectures. This will be a continuing trend driven by event-based programming and push models for notifications commonly found in technologies built on top of technology such as Node.js or other event-based frameworks.

Read Looking Back at 2017 APM Predictions - Did They Come True? Part 2, outlining the 2017 APM Predictions that came true.

Jonah Kowall is CTO of Kentik
Share this

The Latest

September 23, 2021

The Internet played a greater role than ever in supporting enterprise productivity over the past year-plus, as newly remote workers logged onto the job via residential links that, it turns out, left much to be desired in terms of enabling work ...

September 22, 2021

The world's appetite for cloud services has increased but now, more than 18 months since the beginning of the pandemic, organizations are assessing their cloud spend and trying to better understand the IT investments that were made under pressure. This is a huge challenge in and of itself, with the added complexity of embracing hybrid work ...

September 21, 2021

After a year of unprecedented challenges and change, tech pros responding to this year’s survey, IT Pro Day 2021 survey: Bring IT On from SolarWinds, report a positive perception of their roles and say they look forward to what lies ahead ...

September 20, 2021

One of the key performance indicators for IT Ops is MTTR (Mean-Time-To-Resolution). MTTR essentially measures the length of your incident management lifecycle: from detection; through assignment, triage and investigation; to remediation and resolution. IT Ops teams strive to shorten their incident management lifecycle and lower their MTTR, to meet their SLAs and maintain healthy infrastructures and services. But that's often easier said than done, with incident triage being a key factor in that challenge ...

September 16, 2021

Achieve more with less. How many of you feel that pressure — or, even worse, hear those words — trickle down from leadership? The reality is that overworked and under-resourced IT departments will only lead to chronic errors, missed deadlines and service assurance failures. After all, we're only human. So what are overburdened IT departments to do? Reduce the human factor. In a word: automate ...

September 15, 2021

On average, data innovators release twice as many products and increase employee productivity at double the rate of organizations with less mature data strategies, according to the State of Data Innovation report from Splunk ...

September 14, 2021

While 90% of respondents believe observability is important and strategic to their business — and 94% believe it to be strategic to their role — just 26% noted mature observability practices within their business, according to the 2021 Observability Forecast ...

September 13, 2021

Let's explore a few of the most prominent app success indicators and how app engineers can shift their development strategy to better meet the needs of today's app users ...

September 09, 2021

Business enterprises aiming at digital transformation or IT companies developing new software applications face challenges in developing eye-catching, robust, fast-loading, mobile-friendly, content-rich, and user-friendly software. However, with increased pressure to reduce costs and save time, business enterprises often give a short shrift to performance testing services ...

September 08, 2021

DevOps, SRE and other operations teams use observability solutions with AIOps to ingest and normalize data to get visibility into tech stacks from a centralized system, reduce noise and understand the data's context for quicker mean time to recovery (MTTR). With AI using these processes to produce actionable insights, teams are free to spend more time innovating and providing superior service assurance. Let's explore AI's role in ingestion and normalization, and then dive into correlation and deduplication too ...