Q&A Part One: Ovum Talks About APM
September 27, 2012
Share this

In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Michael Azoff, Principal Analyst at Ovum, talks about his APM Solution Guide 2012, the APM market, and the definition of APM.

APM: How did Ovum's APM Solution Guide come about?

MA: The first time that I wrote about Application Performance Management (APM) was in 2004. The next time I looked at the space was 2008. Now this report is in 2012. So it looks like I'm writing these every four years.

For this report, I was being approached by various vendors, some of them new to the market, and I was very intrigued because they were telling me they were doing all these new things.

At the same time felt that the term APM was very broadly used. There were all these different vendors, they all have different histories, they all have a different take on what APM means and what they offer. So I thought that we really need to get clarification. That was the spark for the report.

Although the Solution Guide does not tend to be exhaustive, I think it is very representative of the leading players in the market. It provides a short analysis of the vendors, and the Ovum APM Rainbow Map which is chart where you can see the features at a glance. It is an opportunity to see what is really happening in APM.

APM: How did you conduct the research?

MA: Mostly talking to the vendors. I had a briefing with each vendor, and I also created a features matrix. The features matrix is a spreadsheet with about 200 rows that we ask vendors to complete. That information is what underlies the Ovum APM Rainbow Map.

APM: What are the most interesting changes you have seen in the current APM market?

MA: I think what we are seeing is that the new infrastructure that is coming out – the Cloud, virtualization – is pushing the envelope for what APM needs to offer. You've also got innovators providing business transaction management, for example. You've got innovation in end-to-end monitoring across a whole range of different edge devices. So I think the industry is very healthy in terms of the innovation that is coming out of it. Some vendors are obviously ahead of others, and I think that is brought out in the report.

APM: Did your research help you come to terms with the definition of APM?

MA: I think APM is still confusing, as a term, because it covers so much. I think end users really need to understand exactly how each vendor is actually using that term, in what it is covering. I think the Solution Guide helps in that respect.

APM: It is interesting that you mention how broad the term APM is, because I see that you include cyber security as an APM capability, and normally I view that as separate from APM. How do you see that fitting in?

MA: Yes, I got a comment from a Gartner analyst querying that. That is an example of where I, as an analyst, am sticking my neck out and saying what the market should be. And the market carries on blithely regardless of my view.

The fact of the matter is that if you look at application development logically, security should be something that developers think about right from the start. I think this is more important today because we are having more applications running outside the firewall. So there is a real need to address these issues.

I don't see a logical separation between security and the rest of application development. I think that application developers should be trained to be aware of security issues, and I think that would make it safer for the end-users. We have profiled this approach in a number of reports in our research. My bringing security into the broader definition of APM is part of that approach, creating awareness. Whether the market embraces that or not is another matter.

APM: Another capability that you included in APM, which I agree with, is network performance management. Explain how you see NPM in relation to APM.

MA: Yes, absolutely. Historically, going back to 2004 and 2008 when I was reviewing the market, the vendors were coming from different traditions, and they were quite separate products. From an end-user point of view, these types of historical divisions don't make any logical sense. They want an application to work, and if there are issues affecting the performance deriving from infrastructure, the information needs to be brought out. So I argued for integrating applications and network right from the early days.

What I think is interesting to see today, is that we are getting nearer to that point. There is greater recognition of the need to have that type of approach. We are seeing vendors embrace that. We are getting nearer to that optimal point where these kinds of historical divisions are not going to affect what kind of product is offered.

We are seeing this crossover between traditional network performance tools that are actually providing a lot of information about applications. So I think we are getting to some interesting crossroads. I take a very broad approach and I think we are seeing that trend in the market.

Click here to read Q&A Part Two: Ovum Talks About APM

Share this

The Latest

November 14, 2019

A brief introduction to Applications Performance Monitoring (APM), breaking it down to a few key points, followed by a few important lessons which I have learned over the years ...

November 13, 2019

Research conducted by ServiceNow shows that Gen Zs, now entering the workforce, recognize the promise of technology to improve work experiences, are eager to learn from other generations, and believe they can help older generations be more open‑minded ...

November 12, 2019

We're in the middle of a technology and connectivity revolution, giving us access to infinite digital tools and technologies. Is this multitude of technology solutions empowering us to do our best work, or getting in our way? ...

November 07, 2019

Microservices have become the go-to architectural standard in modern distributed systems. While there are plenty of tools and techniques to architect, manage, and automate the deployment of such distributed systems, issues during troubleshooting still happen at the individual service level, thereby prolonging the time taken to resolve an outage ...

November 06, 2019

A recent APMdigest blog by Jean Tunis provided an excellent background on Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and what it does. A further topic that I wanted to touch on though is the need for good quality data. If you are to get the most out of your APM solution possible, you will need to feed it with the best quality data ...

November 05, 2019

Humans and manual processes can no longer keep pace with network innovation, evolution, complexity, and change. That's why we're hearing more about self-driving networks, self-healing networks, intent-based networking, and other concepts. These approaches collectively belong to a growing focus area called AIOps, which aims to apply automation, AI and ML to support modern network operations ...

November 04, 2019

IT outages happen to companies across the globe, regardless of location, annual revenue or size. Even the most mammoth companies are at risk of downtime. Increasingly over the past few years, high-profile IT outages — defined as when the services or systems a business provides suddenly become unavailable — have ended up splashed across national news headlines ...

October 31, 2019

APM tools are ideal for an application owner or a line of business owner to track the performance of their key applications. But these tools have broader applicability to different stakeholders in an organization. In this blog, we will review the teams and functional departments that can make use of an APM tool and how they could put it to work ...

October 30, 2019

Enterprises depending exclusively on legacy monitoring tools are falling behind in business agility and operational efficiency, according to a new study, Prevalence of Legacy Tools Paralyzes Enterprises' Ability to Innovate conducted by Forrester Consulting ...

October 29, 2019

Hyperconverged infrastructure is sometimes referred to as a "data center in a box" because, after the initial cabling and minimal networking configuration, it has all of the features and functionality of the traditional 3-2-1 virtualization architecture (except that single point of failure) ...