The Pros & Cons of Flow & Packet Data - Part 2
February 23, 2022

Jay Botelho

Share this

What are the cons or challenges of Flow and Packet data?

Start with: The Pros and Cons of Flow and Packet Data - Part 1

While Flow data offers a high level of traffic visibility, it has little detail about what's actually flowing. For example, you can't see microbursts, or the amount of time an application spends churning on a request. It can also present complications for flow monitoring at the edge (small, remote offices), since many edge routers aren't full-featured enough to offer xFlow.

And although xFlow come "for free," it does put an extra processing load on the router, especially when the router is very busy, and this can lead to gaps in visibility when you need it most.

Finally, flow sampling is sometimes used to reduce the processing load on the router, making security detection much less effective since some flows, and perhaps the flows in question, may not be reported on due to sampling.

When it comes to Packet data, dedicated hardware and cabling are required between mirror ports on a router and a DPI application or appliance. This means there's more equipment to purchase, configure and maintain. Furthermore, when routers get busy the processing power required to mirror data can be reduced, resuling in some data not being mirrored, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the mirrored data. This can be addressed by using network taps or packet brokers, but this introduces even more hardware into the solution.

Packet data also requires specialized tools for analysis and a high level of expertise to be used effectively. To reap the benefits of packet data, organizations need to invest in solutions like protocol analyzers and have NetOps teams that understand how to use them. It also adds more complexity to network management, as network engineers need to be very aware of what data they want to monitor, and then ensure that the data mirroring they originally configure remains relevant as other network changes are made.

And the use of HTTPS and VPNs that create privacy tunneling is making packet payload analysis more challenging, often limited to specific instances where the keys for decryption are known for specific network flows.

What are some common ways to use Flow and Packet data to troubleshoot network performance?

The more complex underlying network problems are, the more sleuthing and expertise in protocol and packet analysis are needed. End-to-end visibility extrapolated from Flow and Packet data aids network troubleshooting at the most critical levels and sets the stage for further monitoring integrations that track application performance and sophisticated user experiences.

By using network monitoring solutions (like NPMD and NDR), finding the answers to common issues can be simplified. Here are four ways Packet and Flow data can help.

Topological Views

These views use Flow and Packet data to provide a comprehensive map of network performance. This helps Netops teams to identify infrastructure components in need of upgrading or replacement, and perform capacity planning. They also help when maintaining a real-time comprehensive device inventory, can trigger automatic device discovery, can help to proactively identify choke points on the network, and can be used to compare different performance metrics.

Flow Path Analysis

This is used to identify possible routes, hops, and network latency impacts across endpoints based on IP address. Packet and flow data allows Netops to identify issues caused by load balancing and to identify other issues caused by routing, such as sudden changes in network latency and poor performance of real-time protocols, typically voice and video.

Application Monitoring

Establishing performance baselines that can be used to monitor for abnormal traffic levels is crucial for application performance. Flow and Packet data allows NetOps to uncover insight into how the network is being used at the application level. For example, by identifying policy weaknesses that have allowed unwanted usage.

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Monitoring

Having insight into Flow and Packet data allows NetOps and SecOps to identify a known attack or type of attack based on its signature (signature-based). Teams can also identify deviations from the norm of network behaviors (anomaly-based) or the norms of protocol use (stateful protocol analysis).

Oftentimes, enterprises have seen Flow and Packet data as mutually exclusive — that one can be utilized without the need for the other — but the truth is that when combined NetOps teams can gain more complete visibility. This helps to protect against security threats, investigate alerts and ensure the overall performance of the network and applications.

Jay Botelho is Senior Director of Product Management at LiveAction
Share this

The Latest

January 26, 2023

As enterprises work to implement or improve their observability practices, tool sprawl is a very real phenomenon ... Tool sprawl can and does happen all across the organization. In this post, though, we'll focus specifically on how and why observability efforts often result in tool sprawl, some of the possible negative consequences of that sprawl, and we'll offer some advice on how to reduce or even avoid sprawl ...

January 25, 2023

As companies generate more data across their network footprints, they need network observability tools to help find meaning in that data for better decision-making and problem solving. It seems many companies believe that adding more tools leads to better and faster insights ... And yet, observability tools aren't meeting many companies' needs. In fact, adding more tools introduces new challenges ...

January 24, 2023

Driven by the need to create scalable, faster, and more agile systems, businesses are adopting cloud native approaches. But cloud native environments also come with an explosion of data and complexity that makes it harder for businesses to detect and remediate issues before everything comes to a screeching halt. Observability, if done right, can make it easier to mitigate these challenges and remediate incidents before they become major customer-impacting problems ...

January 23, 2023

The spiraling cost of energy is forcing public cloud providers to raise their prices significantly. A recent report by Canalys predicted that public cloud prices will jump by around 20% in the US and more than 30% in Europe in 2023. These steep price increases will test the conventional wisdom that moving to the cloud is a cheap computing alternative ...

January 19, 2023

Despite strong interest over the past decade, the actual investment in DX has been recent. While 100% of enterprises are now engaged with DX in some way, most (77%) have begun their DX journey within the past two years. And most are early stage, with a fourth (24%) at the discussion stage and half (49%) currently transforming. Only 27% say they have finished their DX efforts ...

January 18, 2023

While most thought that distraction and motivation would be the main contributors to low productivity in a work-from-home environment, many organizations discovered that it was gaps in their IT systems that created some of the most significant challenges ...

January 17, 2023
The US aviation sector was struggling to return to normal following a nationwide ground stop imposed by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) early Wednesday over a computer issue ...
January 13, 2023

APMdigest and leading IT research firm Enterprise Management Associates (EMA) are teaming up on the EMA-APMdigest Podcast, a new podcast focused on the latest technologies impacting IT Operations. In Episode 1, Dan Twing, President and COO of EMA, discusses Observability and Automation with Will Schoeppner, Research Director covering Application Performance Management and Business Intelligence at EMA ...

January 12, 2023

APMdigest is following up our list of 2023 Application Performance Management Predictions with predictions from industry experts about how the cloud will evolve in 2023 ...

January 11, 2023

As demand for digital services increases and distributed systems become more complex, organizations must collect and process a growing amount of observability data (logs, metrics, and traces). Site reliability engineers (SREs), developers, and security engineers use observability data to learn how their applications and environments are performing so they can successfully respond to issues and mitigate risk ...