In APMdigest's exclusive interview, Paul Brady, Senior Vice President and General Manager of Riverbed Performance Management talks about Riverbed's acquisition of OPNET and entrance into the APM market.
APM: What did Riverbed see in APM that drove you to become involved in this market?
PB: We were having great success with the network operations teams, giving them an application centric view, and that was good, but not good enough. Ultimately they wanted a deeper view into their applications, and a company that could provide that end-to-end view. We thought the distinction between so-called network performance management and application performance management was really blurring. What customers were caring about is performance management.
We felt the world of IT has evolved. Once upon a time it was about the various functions within IT saying: "It is not my fault." That model can no longer survive. It is about making sure you are proactively keeping your applications and infrastructure running.
We also saw a tremendous market opportunity. We see those two markets as very large. There is some disruption happening and we felt a vendor that could provide that end to end capability could change the way performance management happens with customers.
Regarding APM, we saw a very large market, and we saw no dominant player with a major market share. I don't think anyone enjoyed a reputation of having tools that are particularly easy to use. We saw this market as a huge opportunity particularly because as the development platforms evolve, people are going to look at new and different ways to holistically manage performance.
APM: Interesting that you mentioned the blame game because we recently posted an article on APMdigest.
PB: When we started talking to OPNET we both shared stories where people used our products as a way to have a discussion and fix that problem. There is a strong desire to get out of the blame game and to get proactive and I think it is just a natural to evolution.
APM: What attracted you to OPNET?
PB: We thought they had great customer base, a comprehensive set of products, great technology, and there was certainly great awareness of who they were. Obviously, when you do something like this you look at a variety of potential players and we thought OPNET had the most comprehensive complementary suite and really strong technology.
APM: Currently it looks like you're still using the OPNET brand. Is that the plan for the future?
PB: No, I would say we're leveraging the brand. We have Cascade and OPNET, and these are under the umbrella of Riverbed Performance Management, and you'll see that manifested on our website.
For now, all the product names, both Cascade and OPNET, will stay the same. We thought that would minimize confusion, and we will continue to leverage the awareness of OPNET, but when we describe the business as part of a Riverbed we call it Riverbed Performance Management. It will take a year to multiple years to figure out how we want rebrand, and we do not want to move too quickly to rebrand any of the product names, as first we need to figure out how to do it, and second we do not want to confuse our customers.
APM: Prior to OPNET, what capabilities did Riverbed have that would support the move into APM?
PB: We had a product called Cascade Profiler and still do. That was being characterized by the market and analysts as application-aware network performance management. So essentially it collects flow and packets and gives an end to end view of what was occurring within the environment. The network teams kept asking for an application centric view of the network, because that is how the users talk. If a user calls they might say the network is slow but it was generally: “This application is not working.” So we realized great growth with Cascade, and that was driven by our ability to show the application-aware perspective.
OPNET comes at it from a very application centric perspective, so we thought it was a great combination.
ABOUT Paul Brady
Paul Brady is Senior Vice President and General Manager, Riverbed Performance Management. Brady served as VP and GM of the Cascade Business Unit since February 2009. Brady joined Riverbed through the acquisition of Mazu Networks where he was president and CEO.
From 2001 to 2004, Brady served as President of Guardent, a network security company. From 1999 to June 2002, Brady served as SVP at Exodus Communications. Brady joined Exodus through the acquisition of Cohesive Technology Solutions where he was President. In January 1992, Brady founded Business Technologies where he served as CEO until the company merged with Cohesive in early 1998.
Brady holds a bachelor’s degree in computer systems from Hofstra University and an MBA from the Sloan School of Management at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
I've had the opportunity to work with a number of organizations embarking on their AIOps journey. I always advise them to start by evaluating their needs and the possibilities AIOps can bring to them through five different levels of AIOps maturity. This is a strategic approach that allows enterprises to achieve complete automation for long-term success ...
Sumo Logic recently commissioned an independent market research study to understand the industry momentum behind continuous intelligence — and the necessity for digital organizations to embrace a cloud-native, real-time continuous intelligence platform to support the speed and agility of business for faster decision-making, optimizing security, driving new innovation and delivering world-class customer experiences. Some of the key findings include ...
When it comes to viruses, it's typically those of the computer/digital variety that IT is concerned about. But with the ongoing pandemic, IT operations teams are on the hook to maintain business functions in the midst of rapid and massive change. One of the biggest challenges for businesses is the shift to remote work at scale. Ensuring that they can continue to provide products and services — and satisfy their customers — against this backdrop is challenging for many ...
Teams tasked with developing and delivering software are under pressure to balance the business imperative for speed with high customer expectations for quality. In the course of trying to achieve this balance, engineering organizations rely on a variety of tools, techniques and processes. The 2020 State of Software Quality report provides a snapshot of the key challenges organizations encounter when it comes to delivering quality software at speed, as well as how they are approaching these hurdles. This blog introduces its key findings ...
For IT teams, run-the-business, commodity areas such as employee help desks, device support and communication platforms are regularly placed in the crosshairs for cost takeout, but these areas are also highly visible to employees. Organizations can improve employee satisfaction and business performance by building unified functions that are measured by employee experience rather than price. This approach will ultimately fund transformation, as well as increase productivity and innovation ...
In the agile DevOps framework, there is a vital piece missing; something that previous approaches to application development did well, but has since fallen by the wayside. That is, the post-delivery portion of the toolchain. Without continuous cloud optimization, the CI/CD toolchain still produces massive inefficiencies and overspend ...
The COVID-19 pandemic has exponentially accelerated digital transformation projects. To better understand where IT professionals are turning for help, we analyzed the online behaviors of IT decision-makers. Our research found an increase in demand for resources related to APM, microservices and dependence on cloud services ...
The rush to the public cloud has now slowed as organizations realized that it is not a "one size fits all" solution. The main issue is the lack of deep visibility into the performance of applications provided by the host. Our own research has recently revealed that 32% of public cloud resources are currently under-utilized, and without proper direction and guidance, this will remain the case ...
The global shift to working from home (WFH) enforced by COVID-19 stay-at-home orders has had a massive impact on everyone's working lives, not just in the way they remotely interact with their teams and IT systems, but also in how they spend their working days. With both governments and businesses committed to slowly opening up offices, it's increasingly clear that a high prevalence of remote work will continue throughout 2020 and beyond. This situation begets important questions ...