Who's Behind the Management of 24/7 Digital Services?

Eric Sigler
Learn more about PagerDuty

There's no doubt that the technological advances throughout the past several decades have drastically changed how we go about our day-to-day lives. Gone are the days of paper maps and digital cameras, replaced by digital applications available at just the touch of a button — all with high user expectations for seamless performance.

What often goes overlooked in our always-on digital culture are the people at the other end of each of these services tasked with their 24/7 management. If something goes wrong, users are quick to complain or switch to a competitor as IT practitioners on the backend race to rectify the situation.

A recent PagerDuty State of IT Work-Life Balance Report revealed that IT professionals are struggling with the pressures associated with the management of these digital offerings. The survey of more than 800 IT professionals across the US, Australia and the UK indicated that this always-on culture has made the management of digital operations a daunting task for any modern organization aiming to provide quality digital offerings 24/7, wreaking havoc on IT employee work-life balance.


Prevalent Pain Points

According to the previously released PagerDuty 2017 State of Digital Operations report series, the usage of digital services is rising. Consumers rely on the use of these digital applications to accomplish a variety of tasks and have come to expect these services to be fast, secure and easy-to-use.

Failure to meet consumer expectations can have detrimental effects on the companies providing these services, adding pressure to IT teams tasked with delivering on customer satisfaction. In fact, the report reveals that the inability to manage the pressures associated with management of digital services was rated the number one side-effect of fair or poor work-life balance across regions.

94.5 percent of survey respondents believe 24/7 management of digital services results in decreased productivity

The survey also indicated that 94.5 percent of survey respondents believe 24/7 management of digital services results in decreased productivity, making it difficult to provide consistently reliable services.

For some, the burden of the always-on digital lifestyle goes much further than a decrease in productivity. The survey revealed 51.6 percent of respondents in the US stated that being on-call affects their ability to maintain overall health and wellness. When asked how being responsible for digital services impacts members of their family, 25 percent of IT professionals said that it makes their job unmanageable at times.

Visibility Matters

Not only does poor operations health management affect IT professionals and their families, it can have a significant business impact. More than half (52 percent) of IT professionals across the US, Australia and UK reported that their organizations spend between $250,000 and $500,000 on DevOps/ITOps tools to help maintain critical digital services.

In addition to these costs, organizations may face a hefty price tag associated with employee turnover if poor work-life balance isn't rectified. In fact, nearly a quarter (23.1 percent) of survey respondents reported that they would be more likely to search for a new job due to poor work-life balance.

58.9 percent of IT managers don't have the visibility necessary to know when their teams experience a difficult on-call period

Worryingly, the report went on to reveal that 58.9 percent of IT managers don't have the visibility necessary to know when their teams experience a difficult on-call period. Without this visibility, managers are unable to take the necessary actions to course-correct for future on-call periods, potentially impacting an IT professional's overall perception of their work-life balance. Of the respondents who said their managers have slight to no visibility into difficult on-call periods, nearly 1 in 5 (18.1 percent) rated their work-life balance as fair to poor.

The Global Work-Life Imbalance

The survey also showed that while the majority (84.1) of all IT professionals rate their work-life balance as good, very good or excellent, of this 84.1 percent, more than half (56.7 percent) believe that poor work-life balance is just part of the job. Additionally, 40.4 percent agree their work-life balance isn't the greatest but they deal with it anyway.

The responsibility associated with keeping critical digital services healthy is stressful. As result, on-call IT personnel are at high risk for experiencing poor work-life balance, resulting in costly company turnover and lessened productivity. Luckily, there is an alternative. IT teams now have the ability to leverage tools, services, processes and best practices to gain better visibility into difficult on-call periods. These tools statistically measure the impact of incident response on human behavior and can help to reduce the burden of alert fatigue.

Related Links

Hot Topics

Related Vendors

The Latest

AI is Moving Fast, and Enterprise File Data Is Not Ready

Pilots are everywhere, stakeholders are seeking results, businesses are pushing for new tools, and IT teams are being asked to make AI secure, reliable, and useful at scale. But as organizations move from testing AI to operationalizing it, many are discovering that the biggest barrier is not the model, the use case, or even the budget. It is the file data foundation within ...

Move Fast Without the Usual Quality Penalty

Fast or cheap? For most of my career in engineering, speed and quality sat on opposite ends of a seesaw. The "OR" in "fast or cheap" was non-negotiable. It was expected that pushing for faster releases meant that something in quality would give way. Tightening quality controls meant the schedule slipped. Every engineering leader I know has lived some version of that tradeoff ... The seesaw is starting to level out ...

When the Observability Bill Arrives for Agentic AI

I have been building enterprise software for more than 20 years ... One thing stays true across all of it: You do not find out your foundation is wrong during the crisis. You find out when the debt comes due. For a lot of organizations, that bill is arriving now. New research ... puts hard numbers on something practitioners have been sensing for a while. The telemetry problem isn't coming. It's already here ...

AI is Breaking Enterprise Log Management

The rapid growth of AI workloads is pushing traditional log management approaches to their limits, according to The State of Log Management 2026 report from Dynatrace. Modern logs have become critical to understanding, validating, and securing AI-driven decisions, helping organizations ensure reliability, compliance, and performance at scale. However, the volume and complexity of AI telemetry are overwhelming legacy tools ...

How Edge Intelligence Will Redefine Secure Connectivity

For years, secure connectivity has relied on a familiar pattern: route traffic back to centralized gateways, inspect it, and then allow access. This model worked when applications lived in a handful of data centers and users were largely confined to offices. That model is now under strain. Applications are distributed across clouds, users connect from everywhere, and real-time workloads demand performance that centralized inspection points struggle to deliver. As traffic volumes grow and latency expectations shrink, routing everything through a small number of control points has become both a performance bottleneck and a resilience risk. The future of secure connectivity requires a different approach ...

Production Inference Shifts Decisively to Private Cloud

The AI experimentation phase is over, and the private cloud is where enterprise AI workloads are being deployed for security and scale, according to Private Cloud Outlook 2026, a new report from Broadcom ... 2026 marks an acceleration into a full AI tipping point. The shift is being shaped by three forces — costs, complexity, and control — that public cloud environments are increasingly failing to address for production AI at scale. Key findings from the report include ...

Why DevOps Teams Build GenAI Tooling While Most Organizations Still Rely on Manual Monitoring

44% of organizations have reported an outage in the past year tied to suppressed or ignored alerts, and 78% had at least one incident where no alert was fired at all ... Engineers learned about failures from customers. That gap between what our tools report and what our customers experience is the problem DevOps teams have been quietly solving with GenAI tooling, even as most enterprises continue to run their NOCs on manual alert triage ...

Why Cloud Reliability Comes Down to People and How to Improve It

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

Why IT Keeps Getting Handed an AI Training Problem It Can't Solve Alone

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

Bringing IBM i Into the Modern Observability Stack: The Missing Piece of Enterprise AIOps

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...

Who's Behind the Management of 24/7 Digital Services?

Eric Sigler
Learn more about PagerDuty

There's no doubt that the technological advances throughout the past several decades have drastically changed how we go about our day-to-day lives. Gone are the days of paper maps and digital cameras, replaced by digital applications available at just the touch of a button — all with high user expectations for seamless performance.

What often goes overlooked in our always-on digital culture are the people at the other end of each of these services tasked with their 24/7 management. If something goes wrong, users are quick to complain or switch to a competitor as IT practitioners on the backend race to rectify the situation.

A recent PagerDuty State of IT Work-Life Balance Report revealed that IT professionals are struggling with the pressures associated with the management of these digital offerings. The survey of more than 800 IT professionals across the US, Australia and the UK indicated that this always-on culture has made the management of digital operations a daunting task for any modern organization aiming to provide quality digital offerings 24/7, wreaking havoc on IT employee work-life balance.


Prevalent Pain Points

According to the previously released PagerDuty 2017 State of Digital Operations report series, the usage of digital services is rising. Consumers rely on the use of these digital applications to accomplish a variety of tasks and have come to expect these services to be fast, secure and easy-to-use.

Failure to meet consumer expectations can have detrimental effects on the companies providing these services, adding pressure to IT teams tasked with delivering on customer satisfaction. In fact, the report reveals that the inability to manage the pressures associated with management of digital services was rated the number one side-effect of fair or poor work-life balance across regions.

94.5 percent of survey respondents believe 24/7 management of digital services results in decreased productivity

The survey also indicated that 94.5 percent of survey respondents believe 24/7 management of digital services results in decreased productivity, making it difficult to provide consistently reliable services.

For some, the burden of the always-on digital lifestyle goes much further than a decrease in productivity. The survey revealed 51.6 percent of respondents in the US stated that being on-call affects their ability to maintain overall health and wellness. When asked how being responsible for digital services impacts members of their family, 25 percent of IT professionals said that it makes their job unmanageable at times.

Visibility Matters

Not only does poor operations health management affect IT professionals and their families, it can have a significant business impact. More than half (52 percent) of IT professionals across the US, Australia and UK reported that their organizations spend between $250,000 and $500,000 on DevOps/ITOps tools to help maintain critical digital services.

In addition to these costs, organizations may face a hefty price tag associated with employee turnover if poor work-life balance isn't rectified. In fact, nearly a quarter (23.1 percent) of survey respondents reported that they would be more likely to search for a new job due to poor work-life balance.

58.9 percent of IT managers don't have the visibility necessary to know when their teams experience a difficult on-call period

Worryingly, the report went on to reveal that 58.9 percent of IT managers don't have the visibility necessary to know when their teams experience a difficult on-call period. Without this visibility, managers are unable to take the necessary actions to course-correct for future on-call periods, potentially impacting an IT professional's overall perception of their work-life balance. Of the respondents who said their managers have slight to no visibility into difficult on-call periods, nearly 1 in 5 (18.1 percent) rated their work-life balance as fair to poor.

The Global Work-Life Imbalance

The survey also showed that while the majority (84.1) of all IT professionals rate their work-life balance as good, very good or excellent, of this 84.1 percent, more than half (56.7 percent) believe that poor work-life balance is just part of the job. Additionally, 40.4 percent agree their work-life balance isn't the greatest but they deal with it anyway.

The responsibility associated with keeping critical digital services healthy is stressful. As result, on-call IT personnel are at high risk for experiencing poor work-life balance, resulting in costly company turnover and lessened productivity. Luckily, there is an alternative. IT teams now have the ability to leverage tools, services, processes and best practices to gain better visibility into difficult on-call periods. These tools statistically measure the impact of incident response on human behavior and can help to reduce the burden of alert fatigue.

Related Links

Hot Topics

Related Vendors

The Latest

AI is Moving Fast, and Enterprise File Data Is Not Ready

Pilots are everywhere, stakeholders are seeking results, businesses are pushing for new tools, and IT teams are being asked to make AI secure, reliable, and useful at scale. But as organizations move from testing AI to operationalizing it, many are discovering that the biggest barrier is not the model, the use case, or even the budget. It is the file data foundation within ...

Move Fast Without the Usual Quality Penalty

Fast or cheap? For most of my career in engineering, speed and quality sat on opposite ends of a seesaw. The "OR" in "fast or cheap" was non-negotiable. It was expected that pushing for faster releases meant that something in quality would give way. Tightening quality controls meant the schedule slipped. Every engineering leader I know has lived some version of that tradeoff ... The seesaw is starting to level out ...

When the Observability Bill Arrives for Agentic AI

I have been building enterprise software for more than 20 years ... One thing stays true across all of it: You do not find out your foundation is wrong during the crisis. You find out when the debt comes due. For a lot of organizations, that bill is arriving now. New research ... puts hard numbers on something practitioners have been sensing for a while. The telemetry problem isn't coming. It's already here ...

AI is Breaking Enterprise Log Management

The rapid growth of AI workloads is pushing traditional log management approaches to their limits, according to The State of Log Management 2026 report from Dynatrace. Modern logs have become critical to understanding, validating, and securing AI-driven decisions, helping organizations ensure reliability, compliance, and performance at scale. However, the volume and complexity of AI telemetry are overwhelming legacy tools ...

How Edge Intelligence Will Redefine Secure Connectivity

For years, secure connectivity has relied on a familiar pattern: route traffic back to centralized gateways, inspect it, and then allow access. This model worked when applications lived in a handful of data centers and users were largely confined to offices. That model is now under strain. Applications are distributed across clouds, users connect from everywhere, and real-time workloads demand performance that centralized inspection points struggle to deliver. As traffic volumes grow and latency expectations shrink, routing everything through a small number of control points has become both a performance bottleneck and a resilience risk. The future of secure connectivity requires a different approach ...

Production Inference Shifts Decisively to Private Cloud

The AI experimentation phase is over, and the private cloud is where enterprise AI workloads are being deployed for security and scale, according to Private Cloud Outlook 2026, a new report from Broadcom ... 2026 marks an acceleration into a full AI tipping point. The shift is being shaped by three forces — costs, complexity, and control — that public cloud environments are increasingly failing to address for production AI at scale. Key findings from the report include ...

Why DevOps Teams Build GenAI Tooling While Most Organizations Still Rely on Manual Monitoring

44% of organizations have reported an outage in the past year tied to suppressed or ignored alerts, and 78% had at least one incident where no alert was fired at all ... Engineers learned about failures from customers. That gap between what our tools report and what our customers experience is the problem DevOps teams have been quietly solving with GenAI tooling, even as most enterprises continue to run their NOCs on manual alert triage ...

Why Cloud Reliability Comes Down to People and How to Improve It

Cloud outages are usually described as technical failures. When a service goes down, a dependency breaks, or a region has issues, the focus immediately shifts to infrastructure. But if you look closely at how these incidents actually unfold, the root cause is rarely the technology itself. It is almost always tied to decisions made earlier, during design, implementation, or day-to-day operations. The system behaves the way it was built. The real question is how it was built ...

Why IT Keeps Getting Handed an AI Training Problem It Can't Solve Alone

77% of leaders say their teams need AI skills urgently. 64% say their organization plans to train current employees rather than hire new ones. So far, so reasonable. The part that surprised me is who's been put in charge: 34% of those leaders say IT and engineering own the AI skills mandate. Learning and Development or HR own it at 7% of organizations. That's roughly five-to-one in favor of the people who understand the tools, over the people whose actual job is teaching adults how to learn new ones ...

Bringing IBM i Into the Modern Observability Stack: The Missing Piece of Enterprise AIOps

In the ever-evolving digital landscape, enterprises are increasingly focused on enhancing their observability stacks to gain deeper insights into their IT environments. Observability has become a cornerstone of modern IT operations, enabling organizations to monitor, diagnose, and optimize their systems with unprecedented precision. However, a critical piece of the puzzle often goes unnoticed in this transformation: IBM i ...