Q&A Part One: Gartner Talks About APM Cool Vendors
June 25, 2012
Share this

In Part One of APMdigest's exclusive interview, Jonah Kowall, Research Director in Gartner's IT Operations Research group, discusses the Cool Vendors in Application Performance Monitoring report, and emerging technologies in APM.

APM: What was the concept behind Cool Vendors in Application Performance Monitoring? How do you define a Cool Vendor?

JK: The idea behind the Cool Vendors in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) report is just to point out companies that are developing interesting technologies that have not been included in a Magic Quadrant or other Gartner report.

APM: In the Cool Vendors report, you are not necessarily recommending organizations to adopt these technologies, but only to look into the companies to find out more about what they are doing?

JK: Yes, it is a way to say: check out these companies that are doing something innovative. It is also a way to highlight emerging vendors that often end up doing well. If you go back into the history of the Cool Vendors reports, many of the companies covered in those reports have gone on to be successful.

Obviously most of these companies have liability concerns because they are going to be small and emerging companies that do not have many customers. So they are companies to take a look at, but not companies that you want to position as your strategic core.

APM: What is the process? How were the Cool Vendors chosen?

JK: Gartner Analyst Will Cappelli and I went through a list of companies that we thought were doing interesting things – companies that were not previously featured in a Magic Quadrant report – and we chose companies that are taking a different angle on solving problems.

It is up to the Gartner analysts to decide which companies are included in the Cool Vendors report. There is no criteria. There is none of the structure that we have for a Gartner branded research document. A Gartner analyst can write about anything they feel is relevant, interesting and important to the market. We don't have any type of constraints as to what we have to write about or what we cannot write about. That is one of the points that differentiates Gartner from some of the other analyst firms.

We give our opinion, tell you what's interesting, and highlight some vendors. We can even stretch the definition of the Cool Vendors report itself. So a couple of vendors in this year's report were not technically APM, although they definitely have an impact on the APM market.

APM: What is the most interesting information about the APM industry that you discovered while researching the Cool Vendors?

JK: Granularity of the data is driving much of the APM-related decisions. So we are seeing many emerging companies that do very fine-grained monitoring, whether it is APM or system monitoring or network monitoring. Look at the direction that DevOps is going: measure everything, store everything, because you might need it in the future. We are starting to see technology that embraces that mantra in general.

APM: Many of your reports seem to encourage IT organizations to explore cutting edge technologies. Is this one of your goals?

JK: By bringing these emerging technologies up, not only to enterprises but to the market in general, it helps push the envelope a lot more and drives vendors that have conservative product roadmaps to strive to solve the problems that some of these smaller companies are solving. We see these bigger vendors that don't have certain types of capabilities almost forced to invest in those capabilities. And then with emerging companies, users can potentially work better deals than – or at least provide a competitive situation with – an existing vendor.

APM: So it is not just about educating the people who are buying these technologies, but also to actually drive change in the vendors and the industry itself?

JK: I would say that is definitely part of what I try to do, to not only have end users push the envelope as far as what they can do with the technology, but also to ensure that the vendors understand that there are people who are innovating and pushing technology forward, and that they need to keep pace in order to participate in the market.

ABOUT Jonah Kowall

Jonah Kowall is a Research Director in Gartner's IT Operations Research group. He focuses on application performance monitoring (APM), event correlation and analysis (ECA), network management systems (NMSs), network performance management (NPM), network configuration and change management (NCCM), and general system and infrastructure monitoring technologies. Previously Kowall managed a global team of engineers and managers for MFG.com, and was responsible for monitoring and enterprise management software and architecture at Thomson Reuters.

Related Links:

Q&A Part Two: Gartner Talks About SaaS APM

Q&A Part Three: Gartner Talks About Application Performance Management

Share this

The Latest

November 14, 2019

A brief introduction to Applications Performance Monitoring (APM), breaking it down to a few key points, followed by a few important lessons which I have learned over the years ...

November 13, 2019

Research conducted by ServiceNow shows that Gen Zs, now entering the workforce, recognize the promise of technology to improve work experiences, are eager to learn from other generations, and believe they can help older generations be more open‑minded ...

November 12, 2019

We're in the middle of a technology and connectivity revolution, giving us access to infinite digital tools and technologies. Is this multitude of technology solutions empowering us to do our best work, or getting in our way? ...

November 07, 2019

Microservices have become the go-to architectural standard in modern distributed systems. While there are plenty of tools and techniques to architect, manage, and automate the deployment of such distributed systems, issues during troubleshooting still happen at the individual service level, thereby prolonging the time taken to resolve an outage ...

November 06, 2019

A recent APMdigest blog by Jean Tunis provided an excellent background on Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and what it does. A further topic that I wanted to touch on though is the need for good quality data. If you are to get the most out of your APM solution possible, you will need to feed it with the best quality data ...

November 05, 2019

Humans and manual processes can no longer keep pace with network innovation, evolution, complexity, and change. That's why we're hearing more about self-driving networks, self-healing networks, intent-based networking, and other concepts. These approaches collectively belong to a growing focus area called AIOps, which aims to apply automation, AI and ML to support modern network operations ...

November 04, 2019

IT outages happen to companies across the globe, regardless of location, annual revenue or size. Even the most mammoth companies are at risk of downtime. Increasingly over the past few years, high-profile IT outages — defined as when the services or systems a business provides suddenly become unavailable — have ended up splashed across national news headlines ...

October 31, 2019

APM tools are ideal for an application owner or a line of business owner to track the performance of their key applications. But these tools have broader applicability to different stakeholders in an organization. In this blog, we will review the teams and functional departments that can make use of an APM tool and how they could put it to work ...

October 30, 2019

Enterprises depending exclusively on legacy monitoring tools are falling behind in business agility and operational efficiency, according to a new study, Prevalence of Legacy Tools Paralyzes Enterprises' Ability to Innovate conducted by Forrester Consulting ...

October 29, 2019

Hyperconverged infrastructure is sometimes referred to as a "data center in a box" because, after the initial cabling and minimal networking configuration, it has all of the features and functionality of the traditional 3-2-1 virtualization architecture (except that single point of failure) ...